Population variability under stressors is dependent on body mass growth and asymptotic body size.
density-dependence
density-independence
environmental noise
fishing
stock–recruitment relationship
variability
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
17
11
2019
accepted:
03
02
2020
entrez:
8
4
2020
pubmed:
8
4
2020
medline:
8
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The recruitment and biomass of a fish stock are influenced by their environmental conditions and anthropogenic pressures such as fishing. The variability in the environment often translates into fluctuations in recruitment, which then propagate throughout the stock biomass. In order to manage fish stocks sustainably, it is necessary to understand their dynamics. Here, we systematically explore the dynamics and sensitivity of fish stock recruitment and biomass to environmental noise. Using an age-structured and trait-based model, we explore random noise (white noise) and autocorrelated noise (red noise) in combination with low to high levels of harvesting. We determine the vital rates of stocks covering a wide range of possible body mass (size) growth rates and asymptotic size parameter combinations. Our study indicates that the variability of stock recruitment and biomass are probably correlated with the stock's asymptotic size and growth rate. We find that fast-growing and large-sized fish stocks are likely to be less vulnerable to disturbances than slow-growing and small-sized fish stocks. We show how the natural variability in fish stocks is amplified by fishing, not just for one stock but for a broad range of fish life histories.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32257352
doi: 10.1098/rsos.192011
pii: rsos192011
pmc: PMC7062104
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4860648']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
192011Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1779-84
pubmed: 23322735
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):504-10
pubmed: 20810442
Q Rev Biol. 1957 Sep;32(3):217-31
pubmed: 13485376
Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1292-6
pubmed: 12193777
Science. 1984 Jun 1;224(4652):985-7
pubmed: 17731996
J Theor Biol. 2011 Mar 7;272(1):113-22
pubmed: 21146543
J Theor Biol. 2013 May 7;324:32-41
pubmed: 23416170
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Oct;24(10):555-63
pubmed: 19699550
Nature. 2008 Apr 17;452(7189):835-9
pubmed: 18421346
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;286(1898):20182877
pubmed: 30862289
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11(1):33-7
pubmed: 21237757
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 22;282(1811):
pubmed: 26156763
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 22;282(1813):20151053
pubmed: 26246548
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6
pubmed: 9082983
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):658-65
pubmed: 22486788
J Fish Biol. 2012 Nov;81(6):2030-9
pubmed: 23130696
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Aug;6(8):241-6
pubmed: 21232469
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 7;114(6):1347-1352
pubmed: 28115694