Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe.

Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale. Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health-funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services. Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding. This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements.

Informations de copyright

© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc. Alexandra S. RashediEmployment: Cigna (I) Stock or Other Ownership: Cigna (I)Antoinette AnazodoResearch Funding: Merck SeronoCassio SartorioEmployment: Vida Centro de Fertilidade Leadership: Vida Centro de Fertilidade Stock or Other Ownership: Vida Centro de FertilidadeCatharina C.M. BeerendonkTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GoodlifeEllen M. GreenblattConsulting or Advisory Role: Ferring Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: EMD SeronoFernando M. ReisHonoraria: Politec Saúde (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: Politec Saúde (I) Speakers’ Bureau: UCB (I) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbott Laboratories (I)Johan SmitzSpeakers’ Bureau: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ferring PharmaceuticalsMaria T. BourlonLeadership: Medivation, Astellas Pharma Honoraria: Medivation, Astellas Pharma Speakers’ Bureau: Asofarma Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen PharmaceuticalsMichel De VosHonoraria: Cook Medical Research Funding: Cook MedicalRichard A. AndersonConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, HRA Pharma, NeRe Pharmaceuticals Speakers’ Bureau: Roche, Beckman Coulter, IBSA Institut Biochimque Research Funding: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: IBSA Institut BiochimqueRoberto de A. AntunesConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Serono Speakers’ Bureau: Merck Serono Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Serono, MSDTeresa Almeida-SantosConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, MSD Research Funding: MerckTeresa K. WoodruffResearch Funding: Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Inst) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.