Pneumococcal vaccination in adults at very high risk or with established cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diabetes
Dialysis
Myocardial infarction
Pneumococcal vaccine
Prevention
Stroke
Journal
European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
ISSN: 2058-1742
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101677796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 01 2021
25 01 2021
Historique:
received:
16
03
2020
revised:
28
03
2020
accepted:
01
04
2020
pubmed:
8
4
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
8
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are several guidelines that recommend pneumococcal vaccination (PPSV23 and/or PCV13) in adults with a history of cardiovascular disease (established heart failure, coronary disease, and cerebrovascular disease) or at a very high risk of cardiovascular disease. However, there is no randomized controlled trial (RCT) systematic review that evaluates the impact of vaccination on all-cause mortality compared to no vaccination in this particular population. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of pneumococcal vaccination in the referred population. We searched CENTRAL and MEDLINE for relevant RCTs and observational studies. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised by two independent reviewers. We pooled results using a random effects model, and used hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess measure of effect. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and we assessed the confidence in the evidence using the GRADE framework. No RCTs were found. Seven observational studies were included for analyses. Pooled results from five studies enrolling a total of 163 756 participants showed a significant decrease in all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.83, very low confidence), without statistically significant heterogeneity (χ2 test P = 0.21; I2 = 32%). Pneumococcal vaccination was associated with a 22% decrease of all-cause mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease or at a very high cardiovascular risk. However, limitations due to study design and the serious risk of bias in three of the included studies leads to a decreased level of result confidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32259237
pii: 5817309
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa030
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
97-106Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.