Learning in the machine: To share or not to share?
Biologically plausible architectures
Convolutional neural networks
Deep learning
Weight-sharing
Journal
Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society
ISSN: 1879-2782
Titre abrégé: Neural Netw
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8805018
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
24
04
2019
revised:
15
03
2020
accepted:
16
03
2020
pubmed:
8
4
2020
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
8
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Weight-sharing is one of the pillars behind Convolutional Neural Networks and their successes. However, in physical neural systems such as the brain, weight-sharing is implausible. This discrepancy raises the fundamental question of whether weight-sharing is necessary. If so, to which degree of precision? If not, what are the alternatives? The goal of this study is to investigate these questions, primarily through simulations where the weight-sharing assumption is relaxed. Taking inspiration from neural circuitry, we explore the use of Free Convolutional Networks and neurons with variable connection patterns. Using Free Convolutional Networks, we show that while weight-sharing is a pragmatic optimization approach, it is not a necessity in computer vision applications. Furthermore, Free Convolutional Networks match the performance observed in standard architectures when trained using properly translated data (akin to video). Under the assumption of translationally augmented data, Free Convolutional Networks learn translationally invariant representations that yield an approximate form of weight-sharing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32259763
pii: S0893-6080(20)30093-9
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.03.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
235-249Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.