The Use of ESEM-EDX as an Innovative Tool to Analyze the Mineral Structure of Peri-Implant Human Bone.

Bone–implant interface Ca/N ratio Ca/P ratio ESEM-EDX P/N Ratio Retrieved implants

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 25 02 2020
revised: 25 03 2020
accepted: 30 03 2020
entrez: 9 4 2020
pubmed: 9 4 2020
medline: 9 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to investigate the mineralization and chemical composition of the bone-implant interface and peri-implant tissues on human histological samples using an environmental scanning electron microscope as well as energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (ESEM-EDX) as an innovative method. Eight unloaded implants with marginal bone tissue were retrieved after four months from eight patients and were histologically processed and analyzed. Histological samples were observed under optical microscopy (OM) to identify the microarchitecture of the sample and bone morphology. Then, all samples were observed under ESEM-EDX from the coronal to the most apical portion of the implant at 500x magnification. A region of interest with bone tissue of size 750 × 500 microns was selected to correspond to the first coronal and the last apical thread (ROI). EDX microanalysis was used to assess the elemental composition of the bone tissue along the thread interface and the ROI. Atomic percentages of Ca, P, N, and Ti, and the Ca/N, P/N and Ca/P ratios were measured in the ROI. Four major bone mineralization areas were identified based on the different chemical composition and ratios of the ROI. Area 1: A well-defined area with low Ca/N, P/N, and Ca/P was identified as low-density bone. Area 2: A defined area with higher Ca/N, P/N, and Ca/P, identified as new bone tissue, or bone remodeling areas. Area 3: A well-defined area with high Ca/N, /P/N, and Ca/P ratios, identified as bone tissue or bone chips. Area 4: An area with high Ca/N, P/N, and Ca/P ratios, which was identified as mature old cortical bone. Bone Area 2 was the most represented area along the bone-implant interface, while Bone Area 4 was identified only at sites approximately 1.5 mm from the interface. All areas were identified around implant biopsies, creating a mosaic-shaped distribution with well-defined borders. ESEM-EDX in combination with OM allowed to perform a microchemical analysis and offered new important information on the organic and inorganic content of the bone tissue around implants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32260166
pii: ma13071671
doi: 10.3390/ma13071671
pmc: PMC7178284
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1443-1449
pubmed: 28213949
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 Mar 15;92(4):1476-86
pubmed: 19425049
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):792-807
pubmed: 23198697
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):330-341
pubmed: 32142570
Nanomedicine. 2014 Nov;10(8):1729-37
pubmed: 24941460
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 May/Jun;38(3):431-441
pubmed: 29641634
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jun;28(6):742-748
pubmed: 27214566
J Dent. 2013 Jul;41 Suppl 4:S28-39
pubmed: 23929642
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Nov;91(2):975-9
pubmed: 19582841
Biomaterials. 2014 Jan;35(1):25-35
pubmed: 24099707
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):30-6
pubmed: 20070744
J Dent Educ. 2003 Aug;67(8):932-49
pubmed: 12959168
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):181-187
pubmed: 29340352
Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Sep;55(3):236-9
pubmed: 7987739
Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70
pubmed: 7246093
J Inorg Biochem. 1997 Oct;68(1):45-51
pubmed: 9379180
Bone Res. 2019 May 22;7:15
pubmed: 31123620
Biomaterials. 2004 May;25(12):2239-46
pubmed: 14741589
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Oct;91(1):309-19
pubmed: 19507145
Dent Mater. 2017 May;33(5):e221-e238
pubmed: 28233601
Micron. 2005;36(7-8):665-71
pubmed: 16233979
Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 15;84:1-15
pubmed: 30445157

Auteurs

Carlo Prati (C)

Endodontic Clinical Section, School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.

Fausto Zamparini (F)

Endodontic Clinical Section, School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.
Laboratory of Biomaterials and Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.

Daniele Botticelli (D)

Ardec Academy, 47923 Rimini, Italy.

Mauro Ferri (M)

Corporación Universitária Rafael Núñez, Cartagena de Indias 130014, Colombia.

Daichi Yonezawa (D)

Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8102, Japan.

Adriano Piattelli (A)

Department of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Maria Giovanna Gandolfi (MG)

Laboratory of Biomaterials and Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH