Sarilumab and adalimumab differential effects on bone remodelling and cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and predictions of treatment outcomes.


Journal

Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 04 2020
Historique:
received: 08 08 2019
accepted: 27 03 2020
entrez: 9 4 2020
pubmed: 9 4 2020
medline: 12 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptor-α to inhibit IL-6 signalling. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sarilumab and adalimumab (a tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor) monotherapy on levels of circulating biomarkers associated with the acute-phase response, bone remodelling, atherothrombosis, anaemia of chronic disease and markers purported to reflect synovial lymphoid and myeloid cell infiltrates, as well as the potential of these biomarkers to differentially predict clinical and patient-reported outcomes with sarilumab vs. adalimumab. In this post hoc analysis, serum samples were analysed at baseline and prespecified post-treatment timepoints up to week 24 in adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis intolerant of or inadequate responders to methotrexate from the MONARCH trial (NCT02332590). Greater reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP; - 94.0% vs. -24.0%), serum amyloid A (SAA; - 83.2% vs. -17.4%), total receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL; - 18.3% vs. 10.5%) and lipoprotein (a) (- 41.0% vs. -2.8%) were observed at week 24 with sarilumab vs. adalimumab, respectively (adjusted p < 0.0001). Greater increases in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were observed with sarilumab vs. adalimumab at week 24 (22.8% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.027). Patients with high baseline SAA, CRP and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) were more likely to achieve clinical efficacy, including American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria and Disease Activity Score (28 joints)-CRP < 3.2, and report improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and pain visual analogue scale, with sarilumab than adalimumab. Sarilumab was associated with greater positive effects on bone remodelling and decreases in biomarkers of the acute-phase response, synovial inflammation and cardiovascular risk vs. adalimumab. High baseline concentrations of SAA, CRP and MMP-3 are predictive of clinical and patient-reported outcome responses to sarilumab treatment and prospective validation is warranted to confirm these results. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptor-α to inhibit IL-6 signalling. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sarilumab and adalimumab (a tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor) monotherapy on levels of circulating biomarkers associated with the acute-phase response, bone remodelling, atherothrombosis, anaemia of chronic disease and markers purported to reflect synovial lymphoid and myeloid cell infiltrates, as well as the potential of these biomarkers to differentially predict clinical and patient-reported outcomes with sarilumab vs. adalimumab.
METHODS
In this post hoc analysis, serum samples were analysed at baseline and prespecified post-treatment timepoints up to week 24 in adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis intolerant of or inadequate responders to methotrexate from the MONARCH trial (NCT02332590).
RESULTS
Greater reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP; - 94.0% vs. -24.0%), serum amyloid A (SAA; - 83.2% vs. -17.4%), total receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL; - 18.3% vs. 10.5%) and lipoprotein (a) (- 41.0% vs. -2.8%) were observed at week 24 with sarilumab vs. adalimumab, respectively (adjusted p < 0.0001). Greater increases in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were observed with sarilumab vs. adalimumab at week 24 (22.8% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.027). Patients with high baseline SAA, CRP and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) were more likely to achieve clinical efficacy, including American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria and Disease Activity Score (28 joints)-CRP < 3.2, and report improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and pain visual analogue scale, with sarilumab than adalimumab.
CONCLUSION
Sarilumab was associated with greater positive effects on bone remodelling and decreases in biomarkers of the acute-phase response, synovial inflammation and cardiovascular risk vs. adalimumab. High baseline concentrations of SAA, CRP and MMP-3 are predictive of clinical and patient-reported outcome responses to sarilumab treatment and prospective validation is warranted to confirm these results.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32264972
doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6
pii: 10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6
pmc: PMC7137491
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Biomarkers 0
C-Reactive Protein 9007-41-4
Matrix Metalloproteinase 3 EC 3.4.24.17
Adalimumab FYS6T7F842
sarilumab NU90V55F8I

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02332590']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

70

Références

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):921-5
pubmed: 22032557
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 1;8(2):e019325
pubmed: 29391382
Nat Rev Immunol. 2007 Jun;7(6):429-42
pubmed: 17525752
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1424-37
pubmed: 25733246
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Dec;53(12):2143-54
pubmed: 24907149
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Nov 1;57(11):1885-1895
pubmed: 29186541
Bioinformatics. 2018 Oct 1;34(19):3365-3376
pubmed: 29726967
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl 59):S18-27
pubmed: 20576221
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;8(11):656-64
pubmed: 23007741
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Feb;67:487-489
pubmed: 30599401
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Oct 6;18(1):225
pubmed: 27716324
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2010 May;36(2):385-404
pubmed: 20510240
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;69(2):277-290
pubmed: 27860410
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Dec;10(12):720-7
pubmed: 25136784
RMD Open. 2018 Mar 14;4(1):e000607
pubmed: 29556418
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Dec;65(12):1608-12
pubmed: 16793844
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May;76(5):840-847
pubmed: 27856432
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jun 19;20(1):129
pubmed: 29921318
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1806-12
pubmed: 26613768
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013 Oct 02;15(5):R141
pubmed: 24286116
J Med Life. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):144-8
pubmed: 27453744
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Feb 1;57(suppl_2):ii43-ii50
pubmed: 29982781
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Apr;69(4):863-865
pubmed: 27813312
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):R90
pubmed: 25167216
Nat Immunol. 2015 May;16(5):448-57
pubmed: 25898198
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51 Suppl 5:v3-11
pubmed: 22718924

Auteurs

Cem Gabay (C)

University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Gerd R Burmester (GR)

Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Vibeke Strand (V)

Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Jérôme Msihid (J)

Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.

Moshe Zilberstein (M)

Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Toshio Kimura (T)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Hubert van Hoogstraten (H)

Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Susan H Boklage (SH)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Jonathan Sadeh (J)

Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Neil M H Graham (NMH)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Anita Boyapati (A)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA. anita.boyapati@regeneron.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH