Stemmed acetabular cup as a salvage implant for revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB acetabular bone loss.
Acetabular loosening
Complications
Ice cream cone prosthesis
Multiple revisions
Severe acetabular bone loss
Stemmed acetabular cup
Survival
Journal
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
revised:
18
01
2020
accepted:
22
01
2020
pubmed:
9
4
2020
medline:
17
6
2021
entrez:
9
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Certain cases of repeated acetabular loosening with severe bone loss are hardly amenable to reconstruction using a Kerboull-type plate with allograft. This limitation is more likely when the severe bone loss occurs in older adults with significant comorbidities that may require a faster procedure. In these indications, a stemmed acetabular cup may be an alternative, although the outcomes have not been well defined, especially for a version where the peg is coated with porous material and additional screws can be added. This led us to conduct a retrospective study to determine: (1) whether a stemmed cup anchored in the iliac isthmus is a viable alternative in these situations, (2) the complication rate and (3) the revision rate for any reason. A stemmed cup anchored in the iliac isthmus is a viable alternative in cases of repeated revision with severe acetabular bone loss. We performed a retrospective single-center study. Sixteen Integra™ cups were implanted in 14 patients (mean age 72.8±10.4 years, minimum-maximum: 58-95) who had aseptic acetabular loosening combined with severe acetabular bone loss graded as Paprosky IIIA in 7 hips and IIIB in 9 hips. The patients had undergone a mean of 2.7±1.8 (minimum-maximum: 1-6) procedures (i.e. primary and/or revision arthroplasty) before this cup was implanted. The cup's survivorship at the time of review and the complication rate were determined. At a mean follow-up of 48.8±23.4 months (minimum-maximum: 7-85), two patients had died and two were lost to follow-up. Six hips experienced one or more complications (37.5%): three infections (18.8%), two mechanical failures (12.5%) and one dislocation (6.7%). The cup had to be removed in three patients (18.8%). These complications required reoperation, thus the cumulative incidence of revision for any reason at 5 years was 31% (95% CI: 11-55%). Despite the high complication and revision rates, we believe the stemmed acetabular cup is a viable alternative in salvage reconstruction procedures. IV, Retrospective case study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32265174
pii: S1877-0568(20)30067-0
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.01.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
589-596Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.