Comparison of glucose measurement on dried blood spots versus plasma samples in pregnant women with and without anemia.


Journal

Archives of endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 2359-4292
Titre abrégé: Arch Endocrinol Metab
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101652058

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 06 05 2019
accepted: 09 12 2019
pubmed: 9 4 2020
medline: 3 10 2020
entrez: 9 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Objective Compare the concordance degree between plasma glucose and glucose measurements on Dried Blood Spots (DBS) during pregnancy. Subjects and methods Glucose measurement was performed in pregnant women after a fast of 8-12 hours. Venous blood was collected with sodium fluoride, the plasma was separated, and glucose measured by the enzymatic oxidase glucose method. Capillary blood samples were collected and analyzed by DBS. For statistics, the paired Student's t test, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), graphic approach of Altman and Bland, and survival - concordance plot were used. Results 307 pregnant women were evaluated, 88.6% without diabetes and 11.4% with previous diabetes. The glucose ranged from 66 to 190 mg/dL [3.66 to 10.55 mmol/L] in plasma and from 53 to 166 mg/dL [2.94 to 9.21 mmol/L] in DBS. The glucose average values were 88.1 ± 12 mg/dL [4.98 ± 0.67 mmol/L] in plasma and 89.2 ±11,5 mg/dL, [4.95 ± 0.64 mmol/L] in DBS - p-value = 0.084. The ICC value was moderate (0.510), and Pearson's correlation coefficient was r = 0.507 p < 0.001. Altman and Bland's graph showed that difference between the values obtained by both methods is -24.62 to 22.3 mg/dL [-1.37 to 1.24 mmol/L]. Significant fixed bias (-1,16 average difference) and proportional bias (r = 0.056; p = 0.33) were not observed. Anemia was associated with differences between plasma glucose and DBS measurements (p = 0.031). Conclusion Capillary glucose in DBS correlates with plasma glucose; however, the methods do not present good concordance. The presence of anemia worsens this result.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32267357
pii: S2359-39972020005002211
doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000229
pmc: PMC10522073
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0
Glucose IY9XDZ35W2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

454-461

Références

Anal Chem. 2014 Aug 19;86(16):8489-95
pubmed: 25058158
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30 Suppl 2:S251-60
pubmed: 17596481
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Nov;64 Suppl 1:i131-6
pubmed: 19244547
BJOG. 2017 Oct;124(11):1746-1752
pubmed: 27532888
BMC Clin Pathol. 2015 Jul 08;15:13
pubmed: 26157353
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Dec;93(12):4774-9
pubmed: 18826999
BMJ. 2010 Apr 01;340:c1395
pubmed: 20360215
Bioanalysis. 2013 Sep;5(17):2129-36
pubmed: 23829466
Bioanalysis. 2011 Jul;3(14):1567-75
pubmed: 21749218
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Jun 25;422:54-8
pubmed: 23566929
Lipids Health Dis. 2006 Jul 14;5:20
pubmed: 16839425
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 01;4(2):258-62
pubmed: 20307386
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014 Nov;53(11):961-73
pubmed: 25204403
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1981 May;41(3):269-74
pubmed: 7313510
Ann Clin Biochem. 1982 Jan;19(Pt 1):22-5
pubmed: 7065630
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jul;26(7):2005-9
pubmed: 12832303
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Nov;10(7):449-54
pubmed: 19490493
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 01;6(2):396-411
pubmed: 22538154
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Apr;100(4):1646-53
pubmed: 25706240
Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Sep;70(3):359-67
pubmed: 10479198
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-82
pubmed: 20190296
Am J Hum Biol. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):1-9
pubmed: 24130128
Clin Biochem. 1989 Aug;22(4):301-3
pubmed: 2776305
Clin Chem. 2001 Jun;47(6):1113-5
pubmed: 11375303
Clin Chem. 2002 Mar;48(3):436-72
pubmed: 11861436
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997 Dec;47(6):679-83
pubmed: 9497874
Demography. 2007 Nov;44(4):899-925
pubmed: 18232218
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Mar;2(2):242-3
pubmed: 19885349
Br Med J. 1978 Aug 12;2(6135):468-9
pubmed: 678925
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Oct 25;130:231-243
pubmed: 27390013
Sao Paulo Med J. 1996 Jan-Feb;114(1):1100-3
pubmed: 8984587
J Nutr. 2001 May;131(5):1631S-6S
pubmed: 11340130

Auteurs

Ana Lígia Soares Matos (ALS)

Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Jessica Pronestino de Lima Moreira (JPL)

Instituto de Estudos de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Ronir Raggio Luiz (RR)

Instituto de Estudos de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Evelise Pochmann da Silva (EPD)

Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Melanie Rodacki (M)

Departamento de Medicina Interna, Unidade de Diabetes e Nutrologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Juan Fidel Bencomo Gómez (JFB)

Instituto Vital Brasil, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.

Lenita Zajdenverg (L)

Departamento de Medicina Interna, Unidade de Diabetes e Nutrologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH