Extended Depth of Focus Versus Monofocal IOLs: Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Depth Perception
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
/ methods
Lenses, Intraocular
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Pseudophakia
/ physiopathology
Refraction, Ocular
/ physiology
Single-Blind Method
Visual Acuity
Journal
Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
ISSN: 1938-2391
Titre abrégé: J Refract Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505927
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2020
01 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
accepted:
10
02
2020
entrez:
9
4
2020
pubmed:
9
4
2020
medline:
4
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate and compare the objective and subjective outcomes between bilateral implantation of the extended depth of focus (EDOF) Mini Well intraocular lens (IOL) and the aspheric monofocal Mini-4-Ready IOL (both SIFI S.p.A., Catania, Italy). This prospective comparative study included 25 patients (50 eyes) bilaterally implanted with an EDOF Mini Well IOL (EDOF group) and 25 patients (50 eyes) bilaterally implanted with a Mini-4-Ready IOL (monofocal group). Three-month follow-up data included corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity at 4 m and 80, 67, and 40 cm. Defocus curves, subjective and objective contrast sensitivity, and objective optical quality (modulation transfer function cutoff and Strehl ratio calculated with Optical Quality Analysis System [OQAS]; Visiometrics SL, Terrassa, Spain), halometry, and reading performance were measured. Subjective visual quality was evaluated based on National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument 42 (NEI RQL-42) scores. Postoperative uncorrected and corrected monocular and binocular intermediate and near visual acuity was significantly better in the EDOF group (P < .001). No differences were observed for distance visual acuity (P ⩾ .312). Defocus curve outcomes for myopic values were better in the EDOF group (P < .001). No significant differences were found in hyperopic (obtained in steps of +0.50 diopters [D] from emmetropia to 1.50 D) values (P ⩾ .095), contrast sensitivity curves (P ⩾ .087), or OQAS outcomes (P ⩾ .138). Halometric values were significantly better in the monofocal group (P < .05). There was a correlation between mean keratometry values and intermediate/near visual acuity. Significantly better NEI RQL-42 subscale scores for near vision, far vision, activity limitations, glare, dependence on correction, and suboptimal correction were noted in the EDOF group (P < .05). Intermediate and near visual acuity was better after EDOF IOL than after aspheric monofocal IOL implantation while maintaining similar levels of visual quality, except for halo perception. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(4):214-222.].
Identifiants
pubmed: 32267951
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200212-01
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
214-222Informations de copyright
Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.