Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC prior to radical prostatectomy enhances T-cell infiltration into the tumor immune microenvironment in men with prostate cancer.
clinical trials as topic
immunotherapy, active
tumor microenvironment
urologic neoplasms
vaccination
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
accepted:
18
02
2020
entrez:
10
4
2020
pubmed:
10
4
2020
medline:
9
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical trials have shown the ability of therapeutic vaccines to generate immune responses to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). What is relatively less known is if this translates into immune-cell (IC) infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. This study examined whether neoadjuvant prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-targeted vaccination with PROSTVAC could induce T-cell immunity, particularly at the tumor site. An open-label, phase II study of neoadjuvant PROSTVAC vaccine enrolled 27 patients with localized prostate cancer awaiting radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated increases in CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltrates (RP tissue vs baseline biopsies) using a six-color multiplex immunofluorescence Opal method. Antigen-specific responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining after in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with overlapping 15-mer peptide pools encoding the TAAs PSA, brachyury and MUC-1. Of 27 vaccinated patients, 26 had matched prevaccination (biopsy) and postvaccination (RP) prostate samples available for non-compartmentalized analysis (NCA) and compartmentalized analysis (CA). Tumor CD4 T-cell infiltrates were significantly increased in postvaccination RP specimens compared with baseline biopsies by NCA (median 176/mm² vs 152/mm²; IQR 136-317/mm² vs 69-284/mm²; p=0.0249; median ratio 1.20; IQR 0.64-2.25). By CA, an increase in both CD4 T-cell infiltrates at the tumor infiltrative margin (median 198/mm² vs 151/mm²; IQR 123-500/mm² vs 85-256/mm²; p=0.042; median ratio 1.44; IQR 0.59-4.17) and in CD8 T-cell infiltrates at the tumor core (median 140/mm² vs 105/mm²; IQR 91-175/mm² vs 83-163/mm²; p=0.036; median ratio 1.25; IQR 0.88-2.09) were noted in postvaccination RP specimens compared with baseline biopsies. A total of 13/25 patients (52%) developed peripheral T-cell responses to any of the three tested TAAs (non-neoantigens); five of these had responses to more than one antigen of the three evaluated. Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC can induce both tumor immune response and peripheral immune response. NCT02153918.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials have shown the ability of therapeutic vaccines to generate immune responses to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). What is relatively less known is if this translates into immune-cell (IC) infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. This study examined whether neoadjuvant prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-targeted vaccination with PROSTVAC could induce T-cell immunity, particularly at the tumor site.
METHODS
An open-label, phase II study of neoadjuvant PROSTVAC vaccine enrolled 27 patients with localized prostate cancer awaiting radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated increases in CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltrates (RP tissue vs baseline biopsies) using a six-color multiplex immunofluorescence Opal method. Antigen-specific responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining after in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with overlapping 15-mer peptide pools encoding the TAAs PSA, brachyury and MUC-1.
RESULTS
Of 27 vaccinated patients, 26 had matched prevaccination (biopsy) and postvaccination (RP) prostate samples available for non-compartmentalized analysis (NCA) and compartmentalized analysis (CA). Tumor CD4 T-cell infiltrates were significantly increased in postvaccination RP specimens compared with baseline biopsies by NCA (median 176/mm² vs 152/mm²; IQR 136-317/mm² vs 69-284/mm²; p=0.0249; median ratio 1.20; IQR 0.64-2.25). By CA, an increase in both CD4 T-cell infiltrates at the tumor infiltrative margin (median 198/mm² vs 151/mm²; IQR 123-500/mm² vs 85-256/mm²; p=0.042; median ratio 1.44; IQR 0.59-4.17) and in CD8 T-cell infiltrates at the tumor core (median 140/mm² vs 105/mm²; IQR 91-175/mm² vs 83-163/mm²; p=0.036; median ratio 1.25; IQR 0.88-2.09) were noted in postvaccination RP specimens compared with baseline biopsies. A total of 13/25 patients (52%) developed peripheral T-cell responses to any of the three tested TAAs (non-neoantigens); five of these had responses to more than one antigen of the three evaluated.
CONCLUSION
Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC can induce both tumor immune response and peripheral immune response.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT02153918.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32269146
pii: jitc-2020-000655
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000655
pmc: PMC7174144
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cancer Vaccines
0
PROSTVAC
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02153918']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: The NCI has a collaborative research and development agreement (CRADA) with Bavarian Nordic, the manufacturer of the vaccine used in this study. Under this CRADA, resources to develop agents are provided, including the vaccine.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 15;21(16):3619-30
pubmed: 25649018
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Sep 18;6(1):91
pubmed: 30227893
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014 Dec;63(12):1307-17
pubmed: 25186612
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):301-310
pubmed: 30321406
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Nov;3(11):1248-56
pubmed: 26130065
Oncoimmunology. 2015 Oct 29;5(4):e1101204
pubmed: 27141383
Cell. 2018 Sep 6;174(6):1373-1387.e19
pubmed: 30193111
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011 Feb;60(2):197-206
pubmed: 20976449
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Dec;18(4):325-32
pubmed: 26260996
Prostate. 2002 Oct 1;53(2):109-17
pubmed: 12242725
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1112-1121
pubmed: 25466942
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 03;9(2):e87705
pubmed: 24498358
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):478-83
pubmed: 22892362
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014 Feb;63(2):161-74
pubmed: 24233342
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1099-105
pubmed: 20100959
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010 May;59(5):663-74
pubmed: 19890632
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 15;23(22):6812-6822
pubmed: 28893901
Int J Cancer. 2014 Aug 15;135(4):862-70
pubmed: 24474335
Nat Med. 2017 May;23(5):551-555
pubmed: 28346412
Cell. 2018 Oct 18;175(3):751-765.e16
pubmed: 30318143
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 1;37(13):1051-1061
pubmed: 30817251
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2011 May 1;236(5):567-79
pubmed: 21486861
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009 Jul;18(7):1001-11
pubmed: 19548854
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Feb 23;6(3):e1286436
pubmed: 28405518
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Jan;8(1):41-53
pubmed: 11801539
Nature. 2003 Feb 20;421(6925):852-6
pubmed: 12594515
Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 1;71(17):5601-5
pubmed: 21846822
Cell. 2017 Jan 26;168(3):487-502.e15
pubmed: 28111070
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 24;106(11):
pubmed: 25255802
J Immunol. 2005 Mar 1;174(5):2591-601
pubmed: 15728465
Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Feb;2(2):133-41
pubmed: 24778277