Current evidence for nonpharmacological interventions and criteria for surgical management of persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

acromioclavicular joint arthritis arthroscopy orthopedics pain management therapeutics

Journal

Shoulder & elbow
ISSN: 1758-5732
Titre abrégé: Shoulder Elbow
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101506589

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 28 11 2018
revised: 28 01 2019
accepted: 06 03 2019
entrez: 10 4 2020
pubmed: 10 4 2020
medline: 10 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate the individual/combined effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in individuals with persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. The secondary aims were to investigate the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological versus surgical interventions, and to identify the criteria used for defining failure of conservative interventions in individuals who require surgery for persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. Major electronic databases were searched from inception until October 2018. Studies involving adults aged 16 years and older, diagnosed clinically and radiologically with isolated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis for at least three months or more were included. Studies must explicitly state the type and duration of conservative interventions. Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black checklist. Ten surgical intervention studies were included for final synthesis. No studies investigated the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions or compared them with surgical interventions. Common nonpharmacological interventions trialed from the 10 included studies were activity modification (n = 8) and physiotherapy (n = 4). Four to six months was the most often reported timeframe defining failure of conservative management (range 3-12 months). Currently, there is no evidence to guide clinicians about the individual or combined effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for individuals with persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate the individual/combined effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in individuals with persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. The secondary aims were to investigate the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological versus surgical interventions, and to identify the criteria used for defining failure of conservative interventions in individuals who require surgery for persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.
METHOD METHODS
Major electronic databases were searched from inception until October 2018. Studies involving adults aged 16 years and older, diagnosed clinically and radiologically with isolated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis for at least three months or more were included. Studies must explicitly state the type and duration of conservative interventions. Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black checklist.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ten surgical intervention studies were included for final synthesis. No studies investigated the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions or compared them with surgical interventions. Common nonpharmacological interventions trialed from the 10 included studies were activity modification (n = 8) and physiotherapy (n = 4). Four to six months was the most often reported timeframe defining failure of conservative management (range 3-12 months).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Currently, there is no evidence to guide clinicians about the individual or combined effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for individuals with persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32269599
doi: 10.1177/1758573219840673
pii: 10.1177_1758573219840673
pmc: PMC7094063
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

395-410

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Références

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2684-92
pubmed: 23649008
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1224-32
pubmed: 19896043
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84
pubmed: 9764259
Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-7
pubmed: 25844555
Biomed Sci Instrum. 1997;34:380-5
pubmed: 9603070
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Apr;166(4):863-7
pubmed: 8610564
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 May-Jun;9(3):173-6
pubmed: 10888159
Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):167-173
pubmed: 27884499
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):807-12
pubmed: 15069148
Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9
pubmed: 11188601
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;17(4):535-8
pubmed: 18359647
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):204-8
pubmed: 11408899
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:30-7
pubmed: 17159577
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):53-8
pubmed: 17130246
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;4(1 Pt 1):35-40
pubmed: 7874563
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971 Jul;112(3):493-506
pubmed: 5570359
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2415-20
pubmed: 21900626
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Nov-Dec;27(9):580-90
pubmed: 15614246
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;16(4):413-8
pubmed: 17448696
South Med J. 2014 May;107(5):324-9
pubmed: 24937735
Orthopedics. 2017 Mar 1;40(2):119-124
pubmed: 27925640
Arthroscopy. 1998 Jan-Feb;14(1):52-6
pubmed: 9486333
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
pubmed: 2691207
Iowa Orthop J. 1999;19:93-8
pubmed: 10847522
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;4(1 Pt 1):41-50
pubmed: 7874564
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1135-9
pubmed: 11132273
CMAJ. 1998 Apr 21;158(8):1037-40
pubmed: 9580733
Arthroscopy. 2006 May;22(5):516-20
pubmed: 16651161
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):e10-2
pubmed: 21194974
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;42(3):297-316
pubmed: 22607807
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2181-91
pubmed: 25385527
Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jan-Feb;21(1):71-7
pubmed: 8427372
Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959-64
pubmed: 8546527
Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):369-378
pubmed: 28801032
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):181-4
pubmed: 8156670
Am J Sports Med. 1988 Mar-Apr;16(2):97-100
pubmed: 3377109
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Mar-Apr;28(2):215-22
pubmed: 15091126
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):1732-1739
pubmed: 28601491
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Jun;1(2):154-60
pubmed: 19468890
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct;83(10):791-7
pubmed: 15385790
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Mar;21(3):376-9
pubmed: 21700479
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 May;102(3):311-8
pubmed: 26969210
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jun;44(6):800-5
pubmed: 15769790
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Sep;64(7):1053-8
pubmed: 7118971
Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Jan;10(1):4-14
pubmed: 29276532
Clin Sports Med. 2008 Oct;27(4):763-88
pubmed: 19064155
Phys Ther. 1985 Oct;65(10):1514-6
pubmed: 4048288
Pain. 2003 Mar;102(1-2):167-78
pubmed: 12620608
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52
pubmed: 22958838
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):623-32
pubmed: 19405008
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):66-80
pubmed: 22030329
Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31
pubmed: 4139420
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Dec;27(12):2214-2223
pubmed: 30001828
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Apr;78(4):584-7
pubmed: 8609138
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):655-61
pubmed: 15090381
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jan;96-B(1):75-81
pubmed: 24395315
Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Jun;54(3):434-8
pubmed: 6858663
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Jun;18(5):369-79
pubmed: 12763431
Arthroscopy. 2010 May;26(5):697-704
pubmed: 20434670

Auteurs

Gerard Farrell (G)

School of Physiotherapy, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Lyn Watson (L)

Melbourne Shoulder Group, Victoria, Australia.

Hemakumar Devan (H)

School of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Classifications MeSH