Initial pH and shockable rhythm are associated with favorable neurological outcome in cardiac arrest patients resuscitated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Cardiac arrest
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
outcome
Journal
Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
11
4
2020
pubmed:
11
4
2020
medline:
11
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is uncertainty about best selection criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest. We aimed to identify factors associated with a favorable neurological outcome, and to build a score calculable at the time of ECMO insertion predicting the prognosis. Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent eCPR between 2010 and 2017 in a single university hospital. Primary end point was survival with favorable neurological outcome at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge defined as a Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2. Overall low-flow time of the 113 included patients was 84 [55-122] minutes. Eighteen patients (16%) survived with a favorable neurological outcome. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial shockable rhythm, and arterial blood pH at the time of eCPR implantation ≥7.0, were independent predictors of survival with favorable neurological outcome. All of the patients presenting with both non-shockable rhythm and pH <7.0 at the time of eCPR implantation died in the ICU. At the time of eCPR start, only initial shockable rhythm and arterial pH ≥7.0 predicted neurological outcome. A selection of the patients who might benefit from eCPR, based upon initial rhythm and arterial pH rather than on low flow time, should be further evaluated.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is uncertainty about best selection criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest. We aimed to identify factors associated with a favorable neurological outcome, and to build a score calculable at the time of ECMO insertion predicting the prognosis.
METHODS
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent eCPR between 2010 and 2017 in a single university hospital. Primary end point was survival with favorable neurological outcome at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge defined as a Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall low-flow time of the 113 included patients was 84 [55-122] minutes. Eighteen patients (16%) survived with a favorable neurological outcome. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial shockable rhythm, and arterial blood pH at the time of eCPR implantation ≥7.0, were independent predictors of survival with favorable neurological outcome. All of the patients presenting with both non-shockable rhythm and pH <7.0 at the time of eCPR implantation died in the ICU.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
At the time of eCPR start, only initial shockable rhythm and arterial pH ≥7.0 predicted neurological outcome. A selection of the patients who might benefit from eCPR, based upon initial rhythm and arterial pH rather than on low flow time, should be further evaluated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32274152
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.127
pii: jtd-12-03-849
pmc: PMC7139075
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
849-857Informations de copyright
2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1713-9
pubmed: 25449345
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Dec;41(12):2039-56
pubmed: 26464394
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1999-2007
pubmed: 27681706
Lancet. 2008 Aug 16;372(9638):554-61
pubmed: 18603291
Resuscitation. 2019 Mar;136:85-92
pubmed: 30668963
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jul;39(7):1190-206
pubmed: 23673399
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Feb;28(2):182-90
pubmed: 19232884
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:100-47
pubmed: 26477701
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Nov;37(11):1738-45
pubmed: 21965097
Resuscitation. 2017 Jan;110:126-132
pubmed: 27865776
Crit Care. 2019 Jan 28;23(1):27
pubmed: 30691512
Resuscitation. 2017 Mar;112:1-10
pubmed: 28007504
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1779-89
pubmed: 25438253
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Nov;5(7):13-22
pubmed: 26503919
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):790-796
pubmed: 30270729
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1922-1934
pubmed: 27647331
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:274-279
pubmed: 30096634
Resuscitation. 2017 Mar;112:34-40
pubmed: 27993632
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):890-2
pubmed: 22000986
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):698-716
pubmed: 30765037
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:62-70
pubmed: 29020604
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242