Randomized Phase II Trial of Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Recurrent or Persistent Ovarian Cancer: An NRG Oncology Study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Ipilimumab
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Nivolumab
/ administration & dosage
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Progression-Free Survival
Time Factors
United States
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
11
4
2020
medline:
2
2
2021
entrez:
11
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Single-agent PD-1 blockade exhibits limited efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We evaluated ipilimumab plus nivolumab compared with nivolumab alone in women with persistent or recurrent EOC. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, 1-3 prior regimens, and platinum-free interval (PFI) < 12 months. Participants were randomly allocated to intravenous nivolumab (every 2 weeks) or induction with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for 4 doses (every 3 weeks), followed by every-2-week maintenance nivolumab for a maximum of 42 doses. The primary null hypothesis was equal probability of objective response within 6 months of random allocation in each arm. One hundred patients were allocated to receive either nivolumab (n = 49), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 51), with PFI of < 6 months in 62%. Six (12.2%) responses occurred within 6 months in the nivolumab group and 16 (31.4%) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (odds ratio, 3.28; 85% CI, 1.54 to infinity; Compared with nivolumab alone, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in EOC resulted in superior response rate and longer, albeit limited, PFS, with toxicity of the combination regimen comparable to prior reports. Additional combination studies to enhance durability of the dual regimen are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32275468
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02059
pmc: PMC7255977
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Ipilimumab
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1814-1823Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180868
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233193
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233191
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016520
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA196067
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180822
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233339
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Nov;151(2):381-389
pubmed: 30217369
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):2930-2940
pubmed: 28650338
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):124-8
pubmed: 25765070
J Clin Invest. 1981 Nov;68(5):1331-7
pubmed: 7028788
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Feb;152(2):251-258
pubmed: 30470581
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 2;107(9):4275-80
pubmed: 20160101
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):284-296
pubmed: 29809280
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18538-43
pubmed: 16344461
Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 15;73(12):3591-603
pubmed: 23633484
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Immunotherapy. 2015;7(5):473-6
pubmed: 26065472
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 1;20(1):44-55
pubmed: 24045181
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4015-22
pubmed: 26351349
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1080-1087
pubmed: 31046082
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(suppl_8):viii1-viii7
pubmed: 29232467
Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1909-20
pubmed: 26952546
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):203-13
pubmed: 12529460
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(4):802-16
pubmed: 24697589
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):393-401
pubmed: 30676622
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
PLoS Med. 2017 May 26;14(5):e1002309
pubmed: 28552987
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):122-33
pubmed: 23724867
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Apr;141(1):86-94
pubmed: 27016233
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3851-3858
pubmed: 28678668
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 09;11(9):e0161779
pubmed: 27610613