Clinical predictors of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an external validation study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.

CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy CSORN = Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network IQR = interquartile range MCID = minimum clinically important difference NDI = Neck Disability Index cervical mJOA = modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy outcomes predictors spine surgery

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 15 12 2019
accepted: 18 02 2020
pubmed: 11 4 2020
medline: 11 4 2020
entrez: 11 4 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Recently identified prognostic variables among patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) are limited to two large international data sets. To optimally inform shared clinical decision-making, the authors evaluated which preoperative clinical factors are significantly associated with improvement on the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale by at least the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) 12 months after surgery, among patients from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). The authors performed an observational cohort study with data that were prospectively collected from CSM patients at 7 centers between 2015 and 2017. Candidate variables were tested using univariable and multiple binomial logistic regression, and multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to test assumptions about the nature of the statistical models. Validated mJOA MCIDs were implemented that varied according to baseline CSM severity. Among 205 patients with CSM, there were 64 (31%) classified as mild, 86 (42%) as moderate, and 55 (27%) as severe. Overall, 52% of patients achieved MCID and the mean change in mJOA score at 12 months after surgery was 1.7 ± 2.6 points (p < 0.01), but the subgroup of patients with mild CSM did not significantly improve (mean change 0.1 ± 1.9 points, p = 0.8). Univariate analyses failed to identify significant associations between achieving MCID and sex, BMI, living status, education, smoking, disability claims, or number of comorbidities. After adjustment for potential confounders, the odds of achieving MCID were significantly reduced with older age (OR 0.7 per decade, 95% CI 0.5-0.9, p < 0.01) and higher baseline mJOA score (OR 0.8 per point, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p < 0.01). The effects of symptom duration (OR 1.0 per additional month, 95% CI 0.9-1.0, p = 0.2) and smoking (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.06) were not statistically significant. Surgery is effective at halting the progression of functional decline with CSM, and approximately half of all patients achieve the MCID. Data from the CSORN confirmed that older age is independently associated with poorer outcomes, but novel findings include that patients with milder CSM did not experience meaningful improvement, and that symptom duration and smoking were not important. These findings support a nuanced approach to shared decision-making that acknowledges some prognostic uncertainty when weighing the various risks, benefits, and alternatives to surgical treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32276258
doi: 10.3171/2020.2.SPINE191495
pii: 2020.2.SPINE191495
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-9

Auteurs

Nathan Evaniew (N)

1University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta.

David W Cadotte (DW)

1University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta.

Nicolas Dea (N)

2Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, University of British Columba, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Christopher S Bailey (CS)

3Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario.

Sean D Christie (SD)

4Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Charles G Fisher (CG)

2Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, University of British Columba, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Jerome Paquet (J)

5Département de chirurgie, Université Laval, Québec.

Alex Soroceanu (A)

1University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta.

Kenneth C Thomas (KC)

1University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta.

Y Raja Rampersaud (YR)

6Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario.

Neil A Manson (NA)

4Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
7Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, New Brunswick.

Michael Johnson (M)

8Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Andrew Nataraj (A)

9Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; and.

Hamilton Hall (H)

6Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario.

Greg McIntosh (G)

10Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network, Markdale, Ontario, Canada.

W Bradley Jacobs (WB)

1University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Alberta.

Classifications MeSH