Double-Step Machine Learning Based Procedure for HFOs Detection and Classification.
HFO
epilepsy
high-frequency oscillations
intracranial EEG
machine learning
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Apr 2020
08 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
24
02
2020
revised:
03
04
2020
accepted:
06
04
2020
entrez:
12
4
2020
pubmed:
12
4
2020
medline:
12
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The need for automatic detection and classification of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) as biomarkers of the epileptogenic tissue is strongly felt in the clinical field. In this context, the employment of artificial intelligence methods could be the missing piece to achieve this goal. This work proposed a double-step procedure based on machine learning algorithms and tested it on an intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) dataset available online. The first step aimed to define the optimal length for signal segmentation, allowing for an optimal discrimination of segments with HFO relative to those without. In this case, binary classifiers have been tested on a set of energy features. The second step aimed to classify these segments into ripples, fast ripples and fast ripples occurring during ripples. Results suggest that LDA applied to 10 ms segmentation could provide the highest sensitivity (0.874) and 0.776 specificity for the discrimination of HFOs from no-HFO segments. Regarding the three-class classification, non-linear methods provided the highest values (around 90%) in terms of specificity and sensitivity, significantly different to the other three employed algorithms. Therefore, this machine-learning-based procedure could help clinicians to automatically reduce the quantity of irrelevant data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32276318
pii: brainsci10040220
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10040220
pmc: PMC7226084
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Neural Eng. 2018 Aug;15(4):046035
pubmed: 29855436
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;123(9):1721-31
pubmed: 22652068
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Apr;19(2):186-92
pubmed: 21193383
Neurology. 2010 Nov 9;75(19):1686-94
pubmed: 20926787
Int J Neural Syst. 2018 Sep;28(7):1850001
pubmed: 29577781
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:574-7
pubmed: 26736327
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;88(4):1743-52
pubmed: 12364503
Epilepsia. 2008 Nov;49(11):1893-907
pubmed: 18479382
Biomark Med. 2019 Apr;13(5):409-418
pubmed: 31044598
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Sep;64(9):2230-2240
pubmed: 28113293
J Neurosci Methods. 2001 Jan 30;105(1):65-75
pubmed: 11166367
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):255-60
pubmed: 26185243
Ann Neurol. 2012 Feb;71(2):169-78
pubmed: 22367988
Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):33-45
pubmed: 19920064
Int J Neural Syst. 2018 Feb;28(1):1750029
pubmed: 28669244
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2900-12
pubmed: 20810694
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0158276
pubmed: 27341033
Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017 Dec;4:87-96
pubmed: 29532041
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
J Epilepsy Res. 2019 Jun 30;9(1):1-13
pubmed: 31482052
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Jun;110(3):354-60
pubmed: 23522965
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Oct;110(8):1958-64
pubmed: 23926038
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):2140-8
pubmed: 26838666
Neuron. 2005 Dec 8;48(5):787-96
pubmed: 16337916
Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Sep;98(3):265-78
pubmed: 22420981
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep;127(9):3066-3074
pubmed: 27472542
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2329-33
pubmed: 21096802
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;121(3):301-10
pubmed: 19955019
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Feb 12;13:6
pubmed: 30809142
Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Sep;98(3):302-15
pubmed: 22480752
Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Sep;35(9):1573-84
pubmed: 17541826
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 23;7(1):13836
pubmed: 29062105
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Apr 09;14(4):6474-99
pubmed: 24721766
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):187-196
pubmed: 26100149