Ramucirumab in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein after sorafenib in REACH and REACH-2.


Journal

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1478-3231
Titre abrégé: Liver Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160857

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 24 12 2019
revised: 27 03 2020
accepted: 31 03 2020
pubmed: 13 4 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 13 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Limited data on treatment of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) increase the unmet need. REACH and REACH-2 were global phase III studies of ramucirumab in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib, where patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL showed an overall ssurvival (OS) benefit for ramucirumab. These post-hoc analyses examined efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in patients with HCC and baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL by three prespecified age subgroups (<65, ≥65 to <75 and ≥75 years). Individual patient data were pooled from REACH (baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL) and REACH-2. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods (stratified by study) assessed OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Hepatobiliary System Index-8 [FHSI-8] score). A total of 542 patients (<65 years: n = 302; ≥65 to <75 years: n = 160; ≥75 years: n = 80) showed similar baseline characteristics between ramucirumab and placebo. Older subgroups had higher hepatitis C and steatohepatitis incidences, and lower AFP levels, than the <65 years subgroup. Ramucirumab prolonged OS in patients <65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.753; 95% CI 0.581-0.975), ≥65 to <75 years (0.602; 0.419-0.866) and ≥75 years (0.709; 0.420-1.199), PFS and TTP irrespective of age. Ramucirumab showed similar overall safety profiles across subgroups, with a consistent median relative dose intensity ≥97.8%. A trend towards a delay in symptom deterioration in FHSI-8 with ramucirumab was observed in all subgroups. In this post-hoc analysis, ramucirumab showed a survival benefit across age subgroups with a tolerable safety profile, supporting its use in advanced HCC with elevated AFP, irrespective of age, including ≥75 years.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Limited data on treatment of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) increase the unmet need. REACH and REACH-2 were global phase III studies of ramucirumab in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib, where patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL showed an overall ssurvival (OS) benefit for ramucirumab. These post-hoc analyses examined efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in patients with HCC and baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL by three prespecified age subgroups (<65, ≥65 to <75 and ≥75 years).
METHODS
Individual patient data were pooled from REACH (baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL) and REACH-2. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods (stratified by study) assessed OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Hepatobiliary System Index-8 [FHSI-8] score).
RESULTS
A total of 542 patients (<65 years: n = 302; ≥65 to <75 years: n = 160; ≥75 years: n = 80) showed similar baseline characteristics between ramucirumab and placebo. Older subgroups had higher hepatitis C and steatohepatitis incidences, and lower AFP levels, than the <65 years subgroup. Ramucirumab prolonged OS in patients <65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.753; 95% CI 0.581-0.975), ≥65 to <75 years (0.602; 0.419-0.866) and ≥75 years (0.709; 0.420-1.199), PFS and TTP irrespective of age. Ramucirumab showed similar overall safety profiles across subgroups, with a consistent median relative dose intensity ≥97.8%. A trend towards a delay in symptom deterioration in FHSI-8 with ramucirumab was observed in all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
In this post-hoc analysis, ramucirumab showed a survival benefit across age subgroups with a tolerable safety profile, supporting its use in advanced HCC with elevated AFP, irrespective of age, including ≥75 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32279446
doi: 10.1111/liv.14462
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
alpha-Fetoproteins 0
Sorafenib 9ZOQ3TZI87

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2008-2020

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 26813
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182-236.
MarreroJA, KulikLM, SirlinCB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68:723-750.
VogelA, CervantesA, ChauI, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv238-iv255.
BrunotA, Le SourdS, PrachtM, EdelineJ. Hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: challenges and solutions. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2016;3:9-18.
ArellanoLM, AroraSP. Systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in older adults. J Nat Sci. 2018;4:e518.
ChoE, ChoHA, JunCH, KimHJ, ChoSB, ChoiSK. A review of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients focused on management and outcomes. In Vivo. 2019;33:1411-1420.
Abou-AlfaGK, MeyerT, ChengA-L, et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:54-63.
BruixJ, QinS, MerleP, et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:56-66.
KudoM, FinnRS, QinS, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:1163-1173.
FinnRS, RyooB-Y, MerleP, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:193-202.
YauT, ParkJW, FinnRS, et al. LBA38_PRCheckMate 459: a randomized, multi-center phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol. 2019;459:v874-v875.
ChengA-L, QinS, IkedaM, et al. LBA3IMbrave150: Efficacy and safety results from a ph III study evaluating atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) vs sorafenib (Sor) as first treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ann Oncol. ;150:ix186-ix187.
RimassaL, DanesiR, PressianiT, MerleP. Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: improving outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;77:20-28.
ZhuAX, KangY-K, YenC-J, et al. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:282-296.
ZhuAX, ParkJO, RyooB-Y, et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:859-870.
YountS, CellaD, WebsterK, et al. Assessment of patient-reported clinical outcome in pancreatic and other hepatobiliary cancers: the FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24:32-44.
LlovetJ, KudoM, KangY-K, et al. Ramucirumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP): an exposure-response analysis. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:758P.
RimassaL, CicinI, BlancJ-F, et al. Outcomes based on age in the phase 3 CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:4090-4090.
MuroK, ChoJY, BodokyG, et al. Age does not influence efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced gastric cancer: subgroup analyses of REGARD and RAINBOW. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:814-824.
ArnoldD, FuchsCS, TaberneroJ, et al. Meta-analysis of individual patient safety data from six randomized, placebo-controlled trials with the antiangiogenic VEGFR2-binding monoclonal antibody ramucirumab. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2932-2942.
NishikawaH, KimuraT, KitaR, OsakiY. Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a literature review. J Cancer. 2013;4:635-643.
ZhouK, FountzilasC. Outcomes and quality of life of systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2019;11:861.
PallisAG, FortpiedC, WeddingU, et al. EORTC elderly task force position paper: approach to the older cancer patient. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1502-1513.

Auteurs

Masatoshi Kudo (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Peter R Galle (PR)

Department of Internal Medicine, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.

Josep M Llovet (JM)

Translational Research in Hepatic Oncology Group, Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Richard S Finn (RS)

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Arndt Vogel (A)

Department of Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Kenta Motomura (K)

Department of Hepatology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Eric Assenat (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Philippe Merle (P)

Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Northern Lyon Hospital Group, Lyon, France.

Giovanni Brandi (G)

Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicicne, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.

Bruno Daniele (B)

Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Gaetano Rummo, Benevento, Italy.

Takuji Okusaka (T)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Jiří Tomášek (J)

Department of Complex Oncology Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Christophe Borg (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Vincenzo Dadduzio (V)

Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit-1, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Manabu Morimoto (M)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Marc Pracht (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Min-Hua Jen (MH)

Global Statistical Sciences, Eli Lilly and Company, Surrey, UK.

Nora Drove Ubreva (N)

Medicines Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, Kobe, Japan.

Ryan C Widau (RC)

Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Kenta Shinozaki (K)

Medicines Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, Kobe, Japan.

Reigetsu Yoshikawa (R)

Medicines Development Unit Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, Kobe, Japan.

Andrew X Zhu (AX)

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH