Signal removal methods for highly multiplexed immunofluorescent staining using antibody conjugated oligonucleotides.
antibody conjugation
biomarker distribution
cyclic immunofluorescence
fluorescence microscopy
oligonucleotide
photocleavable linker
restriction enzyme
tumor heterogeneity
Journal
Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
ISSN: 0277-786X
Titre abrégé: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524122
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
entrez:
14
4
2020
pubmed:
1
2
2019
medline:
1
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Successful cancer treatment continues to elude modern medicine and its arsenal of therapeutic strategies. Therapy resistance is driven by significant tumor heterogeneity, complex interactions between malignant, microenvironmental and immune cells and cross talk between signaling pathways. Advances in molecular characterization technologies such as next generation sequencing have helped unravel this network of interactions and have vastly affected how cancer is diagnosed and treated. However, the translation of complex genomic analyses to pathological diagnosis remains challenging using conventional immunofluorescence (IF) staining, which is typically limited to 2-5 antigens. Numerous strategies to increase distinct antigen detection on a single sample have been investigated, but all have deleterious effects on the tissue limiting the maximum number of biomarkers that can be imaged on a single sample and none can be seamlessly integrated into routine clinical workflows. To facilitate ready integration into clinical histopathology, we have developed a novel cyclic IF (cycIF) technology based on antibody conjugated oligonucleotides (Ab-oligos).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32280155
doi: 10.1117/12.2510573
pmc: PMC7145771
mid: NIHMS1576045
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R44 CA224994
Pays : United States
Références
Curr Protoc Chem Biol. 2016 Dec 7;8(4):251-264
pubmed: 27925668
J Histochem Cytochem. 2009 Oct;57(10):899-905
pubmed: 19365090
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 24;6:8390
pubmed: 26399630
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1619
pubmed: 23511483
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Nat Protoc. 2013 Oct;8(10):1852-69
pubmed: 24008381
Nat Med. 2014 Apr;20(4):436-42
pubmed: 24584119
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Aug;24(8):914-6
pubmed: 16900128
J Immunol. 2016 May 1;196(9):3943-50
pubmed: 26994219
Genes Dev. 2011 Dec 15;25(24):2579-93
pubmed: 22155925
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74
pubmed: 11553815
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 16;110(29):11982-7
pubmed: 23818604
Cell Rep. 2017 Apr 4;19(1):203-217
pubmed: 28380359
Methods. 2014 Nov;70(1):46-58
pubmed: 25242720
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):968-981.e15
pubmed: 30078711
J Transl Med. 2012 Oct 03;10:205
pubmed: 23034130
J Histochem Cytochem. 2000 May;48(5):653-62
pubmed: 10769049
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):E215
pubmed: 24398531
J Pathol. 2018 Apr;244(4):421-431
pubmed: 29282718
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;12(4):298-306
pubmed: 22419253