An opportunity for improved engagement and transparency: A systematic review of renal dialysis cost effectiveness and discrete choice experiment studies.
Journal
Healthcare management forum
ISSN: 0840-4704
Titre abrégé: Healthc Manage Forum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8805307
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
4
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
14
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Much attention is given to patient and provider engagement, cost, and quality. Nephrology is in a unique position to examine the intersection of these issues given kidney dialysis is delivered at a high cost to chronically ill patients. Annual dialysis treatments in Canada range from $56,000-$107,000 per patient dependent on modality. Economists quantify the preferred modality by calculating cost effectiveness through quality-adjusted life years or determining utilization through Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs). Cost-effectiveness studies identify peritoneal dialysis as the most economical, yet it is the least used. Discrete choice experiments address patient preferences but rarely include cost attributes. This presents a unique paradigm: cost studies do not include patient or physician perspectives, and DCEs do not consider cost. This systematic review of dialysis cost-effectiveness studies and DCEs identifies an opportunity to increase engagement and transparency by involving all care partners in assessing quality and cost.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32281409
doi: 10.1177/0840470420916775
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng