Effects of trunk stabilization training robot on postural control and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Journal
International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation
ISSN: 1473-5660
Titre abrégé: Int J Rehabil Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7805421
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
4
2020
medline:
12
11
2020
entrez:
14
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our study aimed to confirm the therapeutic effects of using a trunk stabilization training robot (3DBT-33) in patients with chronic stroke. A total of 38 patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The robot group (n = 19) received 30 min of trunk stability robot training in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group (n = 19) received a similar conventional physical therapy as the robot group. All participants were assessed using the following: the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC), timed up and go (TUG) test, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Korean Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE). There were statistically significant improvements in all parameters at follow-up assessment after 4 weeks of intervention (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the FMA-LE, K-MBI, and BBS between the robot and control groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in FAC (P = 0.935) and TUG (P = 0.442). Minimal detectable change was more significantly observed in the FMA-LE and BBS than in FAC, TUG, and K-MBI. The findings in the present study showed that trunk stabilization rehabilitation training using a rehabilitation robot in patients with chronic stroke was effective in improving the balance and functions in the lower extremities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32282572
doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000399
pii: 00004356-202006000-00010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159-166Références
Askim T, Langhammer B, Ihle-Hansen H, Gunnes M, Lydersen S, Indredavik B; GROUP L C. Efficacy and safety of individualized coaching after stroke: the LAST study (life after stroke): a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2018; 49:426–432
Betker AL, Szturm T, Moussavi ZK, Nett C. Video game-based exercises for balance rehabilitation: a single-subject design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87:1141–1149
Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the expanded timed up-and-go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiother Res Int. 2008; 13:94–106
Bower KJ, Louie J, Landesrocha Y, Seedy P, Gorelik A, Bernhardt J. Clinical feasibility of interactive motion-controlled games for stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12:63
Byun SD, Cho DH, Choi WD, Hong YH, Lee ZI, Lee YS. Effects of the balance control training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain NeuroRehabilitation. 2012; 5:32–38
Dickstein R, Nissan M, Pillar T, Scheer D. Foot-ground pressure pattern of standing hemiplegic patients. Major characteristics and patterns of improvement. Phys Ther. 1984; 64:19–23
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7:13–31
Gjelsvik B, Breivik K, Verheyden G, Smedal T, Hofstad H, Strand LI. The trunk impairment scale – modified to ordinal scales in the Norwegian version. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34:1385–1395
Gorman SL, Rivera M, Mccarthy L. Reliability of the function in sitting test (FIST). Rehabil Res Pract. 2014; 2014:593280
Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A, Malezic M, Mauritz KH. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75:1087–1093
Hiengkaew V, Jitaree K, Chaiyawat P. Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed ‘Up & Go’ Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93:1201–1208
Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007; 38:349–354
Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS, Kang YK, Pyun SB, Paik NJ, et al. Development of the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI): multicenter study for subjects with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2007; 31:283–297
Jung HY, Park JJ, Shim JJ, Kim MJ, Hwang MR, Kim S. Reliability test of Korean version of Berg balance scale. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2006; 30:611–618
Kim JH, Ahn SH, Bae SS. Preliminary Study of ambulation training on electromechanical gait trainer in stroke patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2006; 1:1–12
Kim JH, Jang SH, Kim CS, Jung JH, You JH. Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88:693–701
Kim SY, Shin SB, Lee SJ, Kim TU, Hyun JK. Factors associated with upper extremity functional recovery following low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016; 40:373–382
Lee JH, Kim SB, Lee KW, Lee SJ, Park H, Kim DW. The effect of a whole-body vibration therapy on the sitting balance of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017; 24:457–462
Lee SH, Byun SD, Kim CH, Go JY, Nam HU, Huh JS, Jung TD. Feasibility and effects of newly developed balance control trainer for mobility and balance in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012; 36:521–529
Matjacic Z, Hesse S, Sinkjaer T. BalanceReTrainer: a new standing-balance training apparatus and methods applied to a chronic hemiparetic subject with a neglect syndrome. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003; 18:251–259
Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88:1314–1319
Park J, Woo YK, Park SY. Effects of sit-to-stand training on unstable surface on balance in subject with stroke. Phys Ther Kor. 2013; 20:1–8
Pellegrino L, Giannoni P, Marinelli L, Casadio M. Effects of continuous visual feedback during sitting balance training in chronic stroke survivors. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14:107
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39:142–148
Pollock C, Eng J, Garland S. Clinical measurement of walking balance in people post stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2011; 25:693–708
Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:1018–1033
Wade DT, Wood VA, Hewer RL. Recovery after stroke. the first 3 months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985; 48:7–13
Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, Kizony R. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004; 1:12
Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning. implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991; 71:140–149
Yelnik A, Bonan I. Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008; 38:439–445