Patient Preferences for Prenatal and Postpartum Care Delivery: A Survey of Postpartum Women.


Journal

Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 14 4 2020
medline: 9 9 2020
entrez: 14 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To describe patients' preferences for prenatal and postpartum care delivery. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of postpartum patients admitted for childbirth and recovery at an academic institution. We assessed patient preferences for prenatal and postpartum care delivery, including visit number, between-visit contact (eg, phone and electronic medical record portal communication), acceptability of remote monitoring (eg, weight, blood pressure, fetal heart tones), and alternative care models (eg, telemedicine and home visits). We compared preferences for prenatal care visit number to current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' recommendations (12-14 prenatal visits). Of the 332 women eligible for the study, 300 (90%) completed the survey. Women desired a median number of 10 prenatal visits (interquartile range 9-12), with most desiring fewer visits than currently recommended (fewer than 12: 63% [n=189]; 12-14: 22% [n=65]; more than 14: 15% [n=46]). Women who had private insurance or were white were more likely to prefer fewer prenatal visits. The majority of patients desired contact with their care team between visits (84%). Most patients reported comfort with home monitoring skills, including measuring weight (91%), blood pressure (82%), and fetal heart tones (68%). Patients reported that they would be most likely to use individual care models (94%), followed by pregnancy medical homes (72%) and home visits (69%). The majority of patients desired at least two postpartum visits (91%), with the first visit within 3 weeks after discharge (81%). Current prenatal and postpartum care delivery does not match patients' preferences for visit number or between-visit contact, and patients are open to alternative models of prenatal care, including remote monitoring. Future prenatal care redesign will need to consider diverse patients' preferences and flexible models of care that are tailored to work with patients in the context of their lives and communities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32282598
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003731
pmc: PMC7183878
mid: NIHMS1551732
pii: 00006250-202005000-00008
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1038-1046

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS025465
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK092926
Pays : United States

Références

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12
pubmed: 16051459
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 04;9:CD003252
pubmed: 28869276
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 30;(11):CD011975
pubmed: 26617074
BMJ. 2017 Nov 6;359:j4891
pubmed: 29109079
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 May;67(3):1-14
pubmed: 29874159
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jun 03;14:188
pubmed: 24894497
Public Health Rep. 2001 Jul-Aug;116(4):306-16
pubmed: 12037259
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e140-e150
pubmed: 29683911
JAMA. 2017 Jan 10;317(2):190-203
pubmed: 28097361
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;140(2):137-145
pubmed: 29094357
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):552-556
pubmed: 28189608
N C Med J. 2015 Sep-Oct;76(4):263-6
pubmed: 26509523
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Nov;10(6):511-6
pubmed: 16807794
Res Nurs Health. 1987 Jun;10(3):139-48
pubmed: 3647535
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):636-45
pubmed: 24474651
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):784-785
pubmed: 30134408
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;131(3):e104-e108
pubmed: 29470344
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):458-466
pubmed: 29545005
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 05;20(6):e202
pubmed: 29871855
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 16;(7):CD000934
pubmed: 26184394
BMJ Open. 2019 May 5;9(5):e023014
pubmed: 31061012
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):7-18
pubmed: 27779757
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-638.e8
pubmed: 31228414

Auteurs

Alex Friedman Peahl (AF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the National Clinician Scholars Program, the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, the Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research (PWHER), and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH