Arranging good clinical practices training and trial monitoring for a vaccine efficacy study during a public health emergency of international concern.
Clinical Trials as Topic
/ standards
Disease Outbreaks
/ prevention & control
Ebola Vaccines
/ immunology
Guinea
/ epidemiology
Health Personnel
/ education
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola
/ epidemiology
Humans
Immunogenicity, Vaccine
Public Health
Research Design
Research Personnel
World Health Organization
Ebola
Good Clinical Practices
Monitoring
Vaccines
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 05 2020
19 05 2020
Historique:
received:
10
10
2017
revised:
28
02
2020
accepted:
02
03
2020
pubmed:
15
4
2020
medline:
14
4
2021
entrez:
15
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The 2014-2015 outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in West Africa was unprecedented in size and scope. The World Health Organization, government of Guinea and other partners undertook a field trial of efficacy of an Ebola vaccine in Guinea, with a parallel immunogenicity study in front-line workers. However, several obstacles had to be overcome. One was the need to teach Good Clinical Practices to a large group of field workers who had never participated in vaccine clinical trial research. Because the trial design was complex, performing this efficacy trial during an Ebola outbreak would have been challenging even for experienced investigators. For field workers who had never previously participated in a clinical trial, this constituted a daunting challenge. Another challenge was to provide independent monitoring to document the quality and validity of the field trial data to support future regulatory agency licensure. Here we discuss how these challenges were overcome, and what lessons can be drawn for the future. Intensive GCP was expeditiously arranged for 251 clinical study staff on-site in Guinea. The trials were initiated within days after completion of training. Monitoring (100% of participants in the efficacy trial and 50% in the immunogenicity trial) began at the onset of the trials. Early monitoring detected many minor errors but prompt feedback and guidance from the monitors, who explained the mistakes and proposed corrective actions, diminished error frequency as the trials progressed. Monitoring later in the trials showed what one would expect in a study conducted by experienced investigators. Should a vaccine field trial have to be hastily arranged during a future emerging disease outbreak in a developing country setting, our methods of training and monitoring could provide a model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32284269
pii: S0264-410X(20)30359-5
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.03.015
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ebola Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4050-4056Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.