Cre-assisted fine-mapping of neural circuits using orthogonal split inteins.

D. melanogaster Gal4-UAS circuit mapping dopamine expression system neuroblast neuroscience proboscis extension

Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 04 2020
Historique:
received: 24 10 2019
accepted: 11 04 2020
pubmed: 15 4 2020
medline: 30 3 2021
entrez: 15 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Existing genetic methods of neuronal targeting do not routinely achieve the resolution required for mapping brain circuits. New approaches are thus necessary. Here, we introduce a method for refined neuronal targeting that can be applied iteratively. Restriction achieved at the first step can be further refined in a second step, if necessary. The method relies on first isolating neurons within a targeted group (i.e. Gal4 pattern) according to their developmental lineages, and then intersectionally limiting the number of lineages by selecting only those in which two distinct neuroblast enhancers are active. The neuroblast enhancers drive expression of split Cre recombinase fragments. These are fused to non-interacting pairs of split inteins, which ensure reconstitution of active Cre when all fragments are expressed in the same neuroblast. Active Cre renders all neuroblast-derived cells in a lineage permissive for Gal4 activity. We demonstrate how this system can facilitate neural circuit-mapping in In humans – as well as flies and most other animals – the brain controls how we move and behave, and regulates heartbeat, breathing and other core processes. To perform these different roles, cells known as neurons form large networks that quickly carry messages around the brain and to other parts of the body. In order to fully understand how the brain works, it is important to first understand how individual neurons connect to each other and operate within these networks. Fruit flies and other animals with small brains are often used as models to study how the brain works. There are several methods currently available that allow researchers to manipulate small groups of fruit fly neurons for study, and in some cases it is even possible to target individual neurons. However, it remains an aspirational goal to be able to target every neuron in the fly brain individually. The Gal4-UAS system is a way of manipulating gene activity widely used to study neurons in fruit flies. The system consists of two parts: a protein that can bind DNA and control the activity of genes (Gal4); and a genetic sequence (the UAS) that tells Gal4 where to bind and therefore which genes to activate. Fruit flies can be genetically engineered so that only specific cells make Gal4. This makes it possible, for example, to limit the activity of a gene under the control of the UAS to a specific set of neurons and therefore to identify or target these neurons. Luan et al. developed a new technique named SpaRCLIn that allows the targeting of a subset of neurons within a group already identified with the Gal4-UAS system. During embryonic development, all neurons originate from a small pool of cells called neuroblasts, and it is possible to target the descendants of particular neuroblasts. SpaRCLIn exploits this strategy to limit the activity of Gal4 to smaller and smaller numbers of neuroblast descendants. In this way, Luan et al. found that SpaRCLIn was routinely capable of limiting patterns of Gal4 activity to one, or a few, neurons at a time. Further experiments used SpaRCLIn to identify two pairs of neurons that trigger a well-known feeding behavior in fruit flies. Luan et al. also developed a SpaRCLIn toolkit that will form the basis of a community resource other researchers can use to study neurons in fruit flies. These findings could also benefit researchers developing similar tools in mice and other animals.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
In humans – as well as flies and most other animals – the brain controls how we move and behave, and regulates heartbeat, breathing and other core processes. To perform these different roles, cells known as neurons form large networks that quickly carry messages around the brain and to other parts of the body. In order to fully understand how the brain works, it is important to first understand how individual neurons connect to each other and operate within these networks. Fruit flies and other animals with small brains are often used as models to study how the brain works. There are several methods currently available that allow researchers to manipulate small groups of fruit fly neurons for study, and in some cases it is even possible to target individual neurons. However, it remains an aspirational goal to be able to target every neuron in the fly brain individually. The Gal4-UAS system is a way of manipulating gene activity widely used to study neurons in fruit flies. The system consists of two parts: a protein that can bind DNA and control the activity of genes (Gal4); and a genetic sequence (the UAS) that tells Gal4 where to bind and therefore which genes to activate. Fruit flies can be genetically engineered so that only specific cells make Gal4. This makes it possible, for example, to limit the activity of a gene under the control of the UAS to a specific set of neurons and therefore to identify or target these neurons. Luan et al. developed a new technique named SpaRCLIn that allows the targeting of a subset of neurons within a group already identified with the Gal4-UAS system. During embryonic development, all neurons originate from a small pool of cells called neuroblasts, and it is possible to target the descendants of particular neuroblasts. SpaRCLIn exploits this strategy to limit the activity of Gal4 to smaller and smaller numbers of neuroblast descendants. In this way, Luan et al. found that SpaRCLIn was routinely capable of limiting patterns of Gal4 activity to one, or a few, neurons at a time. Further experiments used SpaRCLIn to identify two pairs of neurons that trigger a well-known feeding behavior in fruit flies. Luan et al. also developed a SpaRCLIn toolkit that will form the basis of a community resource other researchers can use to study neurons in fruit flies. These findings could also benefit researchers developing similar tools in mice and other animals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32286225
doi: 10.7554/eLife.53041
pii: 53041
pmc: PMC7217698
doi:
pii:

Substances chimiques

Cre recombinase EC 2.7.7.-
Integrases EC 2.7.7.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA MH002800
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA NS002820
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P40 OD018537
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

HL, AK, WO, BW No competing interests declared

Références

J Biol Chem. 2012 Aug 17;287(34):28686-96
pubmed: 22753413
Nature. 2013 Jul 4;499(7456):83-7
pubmed: 23748445
Neuron. 2012 Mar 8;73(5):941-50
pubmed: 22405204
Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 10;23(2):652-665
pubmed: 29642019
PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4286
pubmed: 19172189
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;116:455-75
pubmed: 26970634
Dev Dyn. 2012 Jan;241(1):169-89
pubmed: 22174086
Cell Rep. 2012 Oct 25;2(4):991-1001
pubmed: 23063364
Neuron. 1999 Mar;22(3):451-61
pubmed: 10197526
Development. 2014 Jan;141(2):253-8
pubmed: 24306106
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jun 16;19(6):
pubmed: 29914172
Cell Rep. 2012 Oct 25;2(4):1002-13
pubmed: 23063363
Neuron. 2015 Nov 18;88(4):774-91
pubmed: 26549332
Elife. 2019 Mar 26;8:
pubmed: 30912745
Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 21;26(22):R1197-R1203
pubmed: 27875702
BMC Genomics. 2015 Sep 16;16:700
pubmed: 26377945
Genetics. 2010 Oct;186(2):735-55
pubmed: 20697123
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;420:289-302
pubmed: 18641955
Neuron. 2009 Feb 12;61(3):373-84
pubmed: 19217375
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 16;29(24):4337-4344.e5
pubmed: 31813606
Curr Biol. 2017 May 8;27(9):1303-1313
pubmed: 28434858
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Apr;42(6):3894-907
pubmed: 24413561
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 23;108(34):14198-203
pubmed: 21831835
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Jun;56:97-105
pubmed: 30665084
Genetics. 2018 May;209(1):31-35
pubmed: 29535151
Elife. 2016 Mar 15;5:e13399
pubmed: 26975248
Cell Rep. 2014 Dec 24;9(6):2152-65
pubmed: 25497093
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Sep;18(9):530-546
pubmed: 28775344
Development. 1995 Nov;121(11):3549-60
pubmed: 8582269
Elife. 2014 Dec 23;3:e04577
pubmed: 25535793
Genetics. 2012 Mar;190(3):1139-44
pubmed: 22209908
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 8;114(32):8538-8543
pubmed: 28739907
Neuron. 2011 Feb 10;69(3):498-508
pubmed: 21315260
Development. 2018 Jun 11;145(11):
pubmed: 29764857
Neuron. 2018 Apr 18;98(2):256-281
pubmed: 29673479
Isr J Chem. 2011 Nov 1;51(8-9):854-861
pubmed: 23620603
Elife. 2017 Feb 17;6:
pubmed: 28211791
J Exp Biol. 2017 Apr 15;220(Pt 8):1405-1410
pubmed: 28167805
Elife. 2019 Feb 06;8:
pubmed: 30706848
Methods Enzymol. 2010;477:183-213
pubmed: 20699143
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 18;32(3):880-9
pubmed: 22262886
Nat Commun. 2014 Aug 04;5:4560
pubmed: 25087594
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9715-20
pubmed: 18621688
Neuron. 2014 Jul 2;83(1):164-77
pubmed: 24991960
Elife. 2015 Jul 20;4:
pubmed: 26193122
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 6;33:219-240
pubmed: 28992439
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 16;105(50):19587-94
pubmed: 19060186
Sci Rep. 2012;2:497
pubmed: 22773946
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Nov;15(11):1420-1428
pubmed: 28317293
Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 10;26(19):2583-2593
pubmed: 27618265
Dev Cell. 2016 Jun 20;37(6):533-44
pubmed: 27326931
Neuron. 2006 Nov 9;52(3):425-36
pubmed: 17088209
Neuron. 2019 Oct 23;104(2):227-238.e7
pubmed: 31395429
Nat Methods. 2010 Dec;7(12):973-5
pubmed: 21037589
Nat Chem Biol. 2016 Dec;12(12):1059-1064
pubmed: 27723747
Genetics. 2017 Jun;206(2):775-784
pubmed: 28363977
Cell. 2014 Jan 16;156(1-2):221-35
pubmed: 24439378
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16378-83
pubmed: 20810922
Dev Genes Evol. 2001 Sep;211(8-9):458-65
pubmed: 11685583
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Oct;35(10):2045-53
pubmed: 27324752
Development. 1998 Nov;125(21):4185-93
pubmed: 9753673
Nat Methods. 2011 Mar;8(3):253-9
pubmed: 21297621
Gene Expr Patterns. 2012 Aug-Sep;12(7-8):261-72
pubmed: 22691242
Chem Sci. 2014;5(1):446-461
pubmed: 24634716
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 1;31(21):e131
pubmed: 14576331
Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 28;20(18):1602-14
pubmed: 20832315
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):631-7
pubmed: 24561995
BMC Genomics. 2008 Feb 28;9:106
pubmed: 18307801
Neuron. 2017 Mar 8;93(5):1003-1014
pubmed: 28279349
Mech Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;128(3-4):165-77
pubmed: 21315151
Neuron. 2015 Feb 18;85(4):819-32
pubmed: 25661186
J Neurobiol. 2003 Mar;54(4):618-27
pubmed: 12555273
Neuron. 2008 Oct 23;60(2):328-42
pubmed: 18957224
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 10;115(15):3900-3905
pubmed: 29581308
Neuron. 2014 Sep 17;83(6):1284-302
pubmed: 25233312
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 18;29(11):3343-53
pubmed: 19295141

Auteurs

Haojiang Luan (H)

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, United States.

Alexander Kuzin (A)

Neural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, United States.

Ward F Odenwald (WF)

Neural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, United States.

Benjamin H White (BH)

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, United States.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH