Aggressive encounters lead to negative affective state in fish.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
05
11
2019
accepted:
20
03
2020
entrez:
15
4
2020
pubmed:
15
4
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Animals show various behavioural, neural and physiological changes in response to losing aggressive encounters. Here, we investigated affective state, which are emotion-like processes influenced by positive or negative experiences, in a territorial fish following aggressive encounters and explore links to bold/shy behavioural traits. Eighteen 15-month old Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) received three tests in order to determine bold/shy behavioural traits then underwent a typical go/no-go judgement bias (JB) test. The JB apparatus had five adjacent chambers with access provided by a sliding door and fish underwent a training procedure to enter a chamber at one end of the apparatus to receive a food reward but were chased using a net if they entered the chamber at the opposite end. Only one third (N = 6) of fish successfully completed the training procedure (trained fish), and the remaining 12 fish failed to reach the learning criterion (untrained fish). Trained fish housed with a larger aggressive Murray cod for 24 h were significantly less likely to enter intermediate chambers during probe tests compared to control fish, demonstrating a pessimistic response. Trained fish showed "bolder" responses in emergence and conspecific inspection tests than untrained fish, suggesting that shyer individuals were less able to apply a learned behaviour in a novel environment. Our limited sample was biased towards bold individuals but supports the hypothesis that losing an aggressive encounter leads to pessimistic decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32287305
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231330
pii: PONE-D-19-30878
pmc: PMC7156048
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231330Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:305-10
pubmed: 23993861
Sci Rep. 2018 May 1;8(1):6818
pubmed: 29717159
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 May;29(3):469-91
pubmed: 15820551
J Exp Biol. 2013 Jan 1;216(Pt 1):18-26
pubmed: 23225863
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 31;7(1):6860
pubmed: 28761063
Nature. 2004 Jan 22;427(6972):312
pubmed: 14737158
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Mar;35(4):1008-15
pubmed: 20043002
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18 Suppl 1:S18-42
pubmed: 26440495
Behav Sci (Basel). 2013 Aug 26;3(3):501-21
pubmed: 25379252
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 14;283(1838):
pubmed: 27605504
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 13;7(1):13181
pubmed: 29030568
Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Jun 16;227:13-6
pubmed: 27043384
Am J Physiol. 1998 Mar;274(3):R645-54
pubmed: 9530229
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2762-72
pubmed: 22927575
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6660
pubmed: 29703989
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Nov 11;374(1785):20190290
pubmed: 31544617
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 29;362(1487):2105-21
pubmed: 17472921
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):2895-904
pubmed: 20685706
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 12;286(1904):20190760
pubmed: 31185864
Brain Behav Evol. 1999 Nov;54(5):263-75
pubmed: 10640786