The Impact of a Tablet App on Adherence to American Heart Association Guidelines During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.
biomedical technologies
emergency medicine
guideline adherence
mobile apps
pediatrics
resuscitation
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2020
27 05 2020
Historique:
received:
13
01
2020
accepted:
23
03
2020
revised:
22
03
2020
pubmed:
16
4
2020
medline:
13
11
2020
entrez:
16
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evidence-based best practices are the cornerstone to guide optimal cardiopulmonary arrest resuscitation care. Adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) optimizes the management of critically ill patients and increases their chances of survival after cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science and survival improvement over the last decades, only approximately 38% of children survive to hospital discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest and only 6%-20% after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We investigated whether a mobile app developed as a guide to support and drive CPR providers in real time through interactive pediatric advanced life support (PALS) algorithms would increase adherence to AHA guidelines and reduce the time to initiation of critical life-saving maneuvers compared to the use of PALS pocket reference cards. This study was a randomized controlled trial conducted during a simulation-based pediatric cardiac arrest scenario caused by pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). A total of 26 pediatric residents were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was the elapsed time in seconds in each allocation group from the onset of pVT to the first defibrillation attempt. Secondary outcomes were time elapsed to (1) initiation of chest compression, (2) subsequent defibrillation attempts, and (3) administration of drugs, including the time intervals between defibrillation attempts and drug doses, shock doses, and the number of shocks. All outcomes were assessed for deviation from AHA guidelines. Mean time to the first defibrillation attempt (121.4 sec, 95% CI 105.3-137.5) was significantly reduced among residents using the app compared to those using PALS pocket cards (211.5 sec, 95% CI 162.5-260.6, P<.001). With the app, 11 out of 13 (85%) residents initiated chest compressions within 60 seconds from the onset of pVT and 12 out of 13 (92%) successfully defibrillated within 180 seconds. Time to all other defibrillation attempts was reduced with the app. Adherence to the 2018 AHA pVT algorithm improved by approximately 70% (P=.001) when using the app following all CPR sequences of action in a stepwise fashion until return of spontaneous circulation. The pVT rhythm was recognized correctly in 51 out of 52 (98%) opportunities among residents using the app compared to only 19 out of 52 (37%) among those using PALS cards (P<.001). Time to epinephrine injection was similar. Among a total of 78 opportunities, incorrect shock or drug doses occurred in 14% (11/78) of cases among those using the cards. These errors were reduced to 1% (1/78, P=.005) when using the app. Use of the mobile app was associated with a shorter time to first and subsequent defibrillation attempts, fewer medication and defibrillation dose errors, and improved adherence to AHA recommendations compared with the use of PALS pocket cards.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Evidence-based best practices are the cornerstone to guide optimal cardiopulmonary arrest resuscitation care. Adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) optimizes the management of critically ill patients and increases their chances of survival after cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science and survival improvement over the last decades, only approximately 38% of children survive to hospital discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest and only 6%-20% after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
OBJECTIVE
We investigated whether a mobile app developed as a guide to support and drive CPR providers in real time through interactive pediatric advanced life support (PALS) algorithms would increase adherence to AHA guidelines and reduce the time to initiation of critical life-saving maneuvers compared to the use of PALS pocket reference cards.
METHODS
This study was a randomized controlled trial conducted during a simulation-based pediatric cardiac arrest scenario caused by pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). A total of 26 pediatric residents were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was the elapsed time in seconds in each allocation group from the onset of pVT to the first defibrillation attempt. Secondary outcomes were time elapsed to (1) initiation of chest compression, (2) subsequent defibrillation attempts, and (3) administration of drugs, including the time intervals between defibrillation attempts and drug doses, shock doses, and the number of shocks. All outcomes were assessed for deviation from AHA guidelines.
RESULTS
Mean time to the first defibrillation attempt (121.4 sec, 95% CI 105.3-137.5) was significantly reduced among residents using the app compared to those using PALS pocket cards (211.5 sec, 95% CI 162.5-260.6, P<.001). With the app, 11 out of 13 (85%) residents initiated chest compressions within 60 seconds from the onset of pVT and 12 out of 13 (92%) successfully defibrillated within 180 seconds. Time to all other defibrillation attempts was reduced with the app. Adherence to the 2018 AHA pVT algorithm improved by approximately 70% (P=.001) when using the app following all CPR sequences of action in a stepwise fashion until return of spontaneous circulation. The pVT rhythm was recognized correctly in 51 out of 52 (98%) opportunities among residents using the app compared to only 19 out of 52 (37%) among those using PALS cards (P<.001). Time to epinephrine injection was similar. Among a total of 78 opportunities, incorrect shock or drug doses occurred in 14% (11/78) of cases among those using the cards. These errors were reduced to 1% (1/78, P=.005) when using the app.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of the mobile app was associated with a shorter time to first and subsequent defibrillation attempts, fewer medication and defibrillation dose errors, and improved adherence to AHA recommendations compared with the use of PALS pocket cards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32292179
pii: v22i5e17792
doi: 10.2196/17792
pmc: PMC7287744
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e17792Informations de copyright
©Johan N Siebert, Laurence Lacroix, Aymeric Cantais, Sergio Manzano, Frederic Ehrler. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 27.05.2020.
Références
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1396-1408
pubmed: 30194902
Simul Healthc. 2018 Feb;13(1):41-46
pubmed: 29401183
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):284-289
pubmed: 30130413
Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):819-25
pubmed: 19423210
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):613-9
pubmed: 24455010
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;55(6):538-543.e1
pubmed: 20202719
Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):255-62
pubmed: 21401537
Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):414-422
pubmed: 30707123
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):120-127
pubmed: 28165347
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(1):71-9
pubmed: 25584474
Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):501-7
pubmed: 23238423
Circulation. 2018 Aug 7;138(6):e82-e122
pubmed: 29930020
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126
pubmed: 22209829
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Apr;32(4):210-6
pubmed: 26990849
JAMA. 2006 Jan 4;295(1):50-7
pubmed: 16391216
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):1091-101
pubmed: 24819576
Resuscitation. 2014 Jul;85(7):945-51
pubmed: 24607871
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182653
pubmed: 30646162
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2328-39
pubmed: 16738269
Emerg Med J. 2017 Nov;34(11):734-738
pubmed: 28768700
Simul Healthc. 2016 Aug;11(4):238-48
pubmed: 27465839
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 29;19(5):e183
pubmed: 28554878
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S526-42
pubmed: 26473000
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jul 09;12(7):e005580
pubmed: 31545574
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492
pubmed: 29386200
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):309-18
pubmed: 23184036
Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):442-51
pubmed: 23339874
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):9-17
pubmed: 18172170
Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):138-42
pubmed: 24056391
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 May;3(5):303-311
pubmed: 30797722
Circulation. 2018 Dec 4;138(23):e731-e739
pubmed: 30571264
Circulation. 2013 Jul 23;128(4):417-35
pubmed: 23801105
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S876-908
pubmed: 20956230