Self-Control Modulates the Behavioral Response of Interpersonal Forgiveness.
cognitive process
decision-making
interpersonal forgiveness
prosocial behavior
self-control
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
14
11
2019
accepted:
28
02
2020
entrez:
16
4
2020
pubmed:
16
4
2020
medline:
16
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have shown that forgiveness is associated with the ability of self-control. However, whether self-control can modulate interpersonal forgiveness remains unclear. In the current study, we aimed to explore the relationship between self-control and the process of forgiveness using a behavioral measure of forgiveness during which participants distributed money between themselves and unknown others who had previously treated them fairly or unfairly in an adapted decision-making task. Seventy-two participants with low or high self-control were recruited based on their scores on the self-control scale (SCS). Results showed that participants exhibited increased anger and decreased happiness after experiencing unfair treatment. Participants with high self-control distributed more money to opponents who previously treated them unfairly compared with those with low self-control, whereas no such difference was observed to opponents who previously treated them fairly between the two groups. A significantly positive correlation was also found between the forgiveness rates and participants' self-control scores. These findings suggest that self-control modulates interpersonal forgiveness responses. Individuals with high self-control expressed an increased prosocial response toward people who previously offended them, which is similar to the process of forgiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32292367
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00472
pmc: PMC7118213
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
472Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Liu and Li.
Références
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):185-90
pubmed: 15050515
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):1090-105
pubmed: 21875230
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Feb;102(2):291-305
pubmed: 21823802
J Soc Pers Relat. 2019 Jan;36(1):109-130
pubmed: 30595617
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 05;7:126
pubmed: 23576973
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;4(2):162-76
pubmed: 26158943
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 May;119(2):440-6
pubmed: 20455617
Psychol Sci. 2000 May;11(3):249-54
pubmed: 11273412
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):263-77
pubmed: 11519931
Emotion. 2019 Feb;19(1):84-96
pubmed: 29565609
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;73(2):321-36
pubmed: 9248052
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 29;8(8):e73519
pubmed: 24009754
J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):271-324
pubmed: 15016066
Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1533-40
pubmed: 23780725
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 08;5:722
pubmed: 25071683
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8
pubmed: 12805551
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Feb;10(2):209-18
pubmed: 24652858
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):119-31
pubmed: 20053037
J Pers. 2005 Feb;73(1):183-225
pubmed: 15660677
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):540-57
pubmed: 12635915
Psych J. 2016 Jun;5(2):101-16
pubmed: 27144924
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:288-97
pubmed: 27261927
Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:769-775
pubmed: 30170150
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 May;98(5):830-40
pubmed: 20438227