Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention.
Stroke rehabilitation
patient-centered
self-management
Journal
International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society
ISSN: 1747-4949
Titre abrégé: Int J Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274068
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
16
4
2020
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
16
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
"Take Charge" is a novel, community-based self-directed rehabilitation intervention which helps a person with stroke take charge of their own recovery. In a previous randomized controlled trial, a single Take Charge session improved independence and health-related quality of life 12 months following stroke in Māori and Pacific New Zealanders. We tested the same intervention in three doses (zero, one, or two sessions) in a larger study and in a broader non-Māori and non-Pacific population with stroke. We aimed to confirm whether the Take Charge intervention improved quality of life at 12 months after stroke in a different population and whether two sessions were more effective than one. We randomized 400 people within 16 weeks of acute stroke who had been discharged to institution-free community living at seven centers in New Zealand to a single Take Charge session (TC1, n = 132), two Take Charge sessions six weeks apart (TC2, n = 138), or a control intervention (n = 130). Take Charge is a "talking therapy" that encourages a sense of purpose, autonomy, mastery, and connectedness with others. The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form 36 at 12 months following stroke comparing any Take Charge intervention to control. Of the 400 people randomized (mean age 72.2 years, 58.5% male), 10 died and two withdrew from the study. The remaining 388 (97%) people were followed up at 12 months after stroke. Twelve months following stroke, participants in either of the TC groups (i.e. TC1 + TC2) scored 2.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.95 to 4.9, p = 0.004) points higher (better) than control on the Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary. This difference remained significant when adjusted for pre-specified baseline variables. There was a dose effect with Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary scores increasing by 1.9 points (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1, p < 0.001) for each extra Take Charge session received. Exposure to the Take Charge intervention was associated with reduced odds of being dependent (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 5) at 12 months (TC1 + TC2 12% versus control 19.5%, odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.99, p = 0.045). Confirming the previous randomized controlled trial outcome, Take Charge-a low-cost, person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention after stroke-improved health-related quality of life and independence. http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615001163594.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
"Take Charge" is a novel, community-based self-directed rehabilitation intervention which helps a person with stroke take charge of their own recovery. In a previous randomized controlled trial, a single Take Charge session improved independence and health-related quality of life 12 months following stroke in Māori and Pacific New Zealanders. We tested the same intervention in three doses (zero, one, or two sessions) in a larger study and in a broader non-Māori and non-Pacific population with stroke. We aimed to confirm whether the Take Charge intervention improved quality of life at 12 months after stroke in a different population and whether two sessions were more effective than one.
METHODS
We randomized 400 people within 16 weeks of acute stroke who had been discharged to institution-free community living at seven centers in New Zealand to a single Take Charge session (TC1, n = 132), two Take Charge sessions six weeks apart (TC2, n = 138), or a control intervention (n = 130). Take Charge is a "talking therapy" that encourages a sense of purpose, autonomy, mastery, and connectedness with others. The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form 36 at 12 months following stroke comparing any Take Charge intervention to control.
RESULTS
Of the 400 people randomized (mean age 72.2 years, 58.5% male), 10 died and two withdrew from the study. The remaining 388 (97%) people were followed up at 12 months after stroke. Twelve months following stroke, participants in either of the TC groups (i.e. TC1 + TC2) scored 2.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.95 to 4.9, p = 0.004) points higher (better) than control on the Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary. This difference remained significant when adjusted for pre-specified baseline variables. There was a dose effect with Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary scores increasing by 1.9 points (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1, p < 0.001) for each extra Take Charge session received. Exposure to the Take Charge intervention was associated with reduced odds of being dependent (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 5) at 12 months (TC1 + TC2 12% versus control 19.5%, odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.99, p = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS
Confirming the previous randomized controlled trial outcome, Take Charge-a low-cost, person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention after stroke-improved health-related quality of life and independence.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL
http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615001163594.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32293236
doi: 10.1177/1747493020915144
pmc: PMC7739137
doi:
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12615001163594']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
954-964Références
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Jun;26(6):493-501
pubmed: 22087047
J Rheumatol. 2000 Jun;27(6):1414-20
pubmed: 10852263
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;(8):CD010442
pubmed: 27545611
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 1;7(5):e016512
pubmed: 28576903
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 3;120(3):439-448
pubmed: 28154096
J Appl Biobehav Res. 2011 Dec 1;16(3-4):148-166
pubmed: 22919263
Int J Stroke. 2018 Feb;13(2):112-116
pubmed: 29214907
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jun 30;28(12):741-9
pubmed: 16754571
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Jun;25(6):501-14
pubmed: 21441308
Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1876-82
pubmed: 9341688
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92
pubmed: 12719681
J Gerontol. 1983 May;38(3):344-8
pubmed: 6841931
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD002925
pubmed: 12535444
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):588-599
pubmed: 28666682
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
N Z Med J. 2014 Sep 12;127(1402):10-9
pubmed: 25228417
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Aug 19;26(16):988-99
pubmed: 15371047
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):352-61
pubmed: 19237435
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD005066
pubmed: 20464736
Lancet. 2014 Nov 29;384(9958):1929-35
pubmed: 25106063
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):593-6
pubmed: 12719682
Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1812-6
pubmed: 8841336
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):604-7
pubmed: 3363593
J Res Pers. 2009 Jun;73(3):291-306
pubmed: 20161160
Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):960-4
pubmed: 21311061
Int J Rehabil Res. 2004 Jun;27(2):151-4
pubmed: 15167114
Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7(4):176-81
pubmed: 4093249