Leishmania infantum and Dirofilaria immitis infections in Italy, 2009-2019: changing distribution patterns.


Journal

Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 21 02 2020
accepted: 06 04 2020
entrez: 16 4 2020
pubmed: 16 4 2020
medline: 6 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

For long time, canine leishmaniosis (CanL) was considered endemic in the southern, central, and insular regions of Italy, whereas heartworm disease (HW) caused by Dirofilaria immitis was considered endemic in the northern region and in the swampy Po Valley. Following the reports of new foci of both diseases, in this study we update the distribution patterns and occurrence of new foci of CanL and HW discussing the main drivers for the changes in the epidemiology of these two important zoonotic canine vector-borne diseases. Based on the statistical analyses of serological assays (n = 90,633) on L. infantum exposure and D. immitis infection performed by two reference diagnostic centres in Italy over a ten-year period (2009-2019) irrespective of the anamnesis of dogs. The distribution patterns of both parasites are herein presented along with the occurrence of new foci. Results highlighted the changing distribution patterns of L. infantum vs D. immitis infection in Italy. CanL is endemic in some areas of northern regions and HW has endemic foci in central and southern regions and islands. Significant differences in L. infantum exposure and HW infection prevalence among the study macroareas were detected. The overall results of the positive tested samples were 28.2% in southern Italy and islands, 29.6% in central Italy and 21.6% in northern Italy for L. infantum and 2.83% in northern Italy, 7.75% in central Italy and 4.97% in southern Italy and islands for HW. HW positivity significantly varied over years (χ New potential epidemiological scenarios are discussed according to a range of factors (e.g. environmental modifications, occurrence of competent insect vectors, transportation of infected animals to non-endemic areas, chemoprophylaxis or vector preventative measures), which may affect the current distribution. Overall, the results advocate for epidemiological surveillance programmes, more focussed preventative and control measures even in areas where few or no cases of both diseases have been diagnosed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
For long time, canine leishmaniosis (CanL) was considered endemic in the southern, central, and insular regions of Italy, whereas heartworm disease (HW) caused by Dirofilaria immitis was considered endemic in the northern region and in the swampy Po Valley. Following the reports of new foci of both diseases, in this study we update the distribution patterns and occurrence of new foci of CanL and HW discussing the main drivers for the changes in the epidemiology of these two important zoonotic canine vector-borne diseases.
METHODS METHODS
Based on the statistical analyses of serological assays (n = 90,633) on L. infantum exposure and D. immitis infection performed by two reference diagnostic centres in Italy over a ten-year period (2009-2019) irrespective of the anamnesis of dogs. The distribution patterns of both parasites are herein presented along with the occurrence of new foci.
RESULTS RESULTS
Results highlighted the changing distribution patterns of L. infantum vs D. immitis infection in Italy. CanL is endemic in some areas of northern regions and HW has endemic foci in central and southern regions and islands. Significant differences in L. infantum exposure and HW infection prevalence among the study macroareas were detected. The overall results of the positive tested samples were 28.2% in southern Italy and islands, 29.6% in central Italy and 21.6% in northern Italy for L. infantum and 2.83% in northern Italy, 7.75% in central Italy and 4.97% in southern Italy and islands for HW. HW positivity significantly varied over years (χ
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
New potential epidemiological scenarios are discussed according to a range of factors (e.g. environmental modifications, occurrence of competent insect vectors, transportation of infected animals to non-endemic areas, chemoprophylaxis or vector preventative measures), which may affect the current distribution. Overall, the results advocate for epidemiological surveillance programmes, more focussed preventative and control measures even in areas where few or no cases of both diseases have been diagnosed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32293524
doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04063-9
pii: 10.1186/s13071-020-04063-9
pmc: PMC7161282
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

193

Références

Trends Parasitol. 2020 Feb 6;:
pubmed: 32037135
Parasite. 2018;25:2
pubmed: 29388550
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Dec 21;11:305
pubmed: 26689960
Vet Parasitol. 2009 Mar 23;160(3-4):190-7
pubmed: 19111991
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Jun 15;210(3-4):167-78
pubmed: 25936435
Parasit Vectors. 2009 Mar 26;2 Suppl 1:S2
pubmed: 19426441
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Jun;84(6):1002-4
pubmed: 21633041
Parasit Vectors. 2010 Jan 11;3:2
pubmed: 20145730
Vet Parasitol. 2019 Mar;267:26-31
pubmed: 30878081
Med Vet Entomol. 1990 Jan;4(1):1-24
pubmed: 2132963
Front Physiol. 2012 Jun 12;3:196
pubmed: 22701433
Parasitol Res. 2013 Mar;112(3):1357-61
pubmed: 23224639
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011 Oct;11(10):1307-17
pubmed: 21417922
Geospat Health. 2009 Nov;4(1):115-27
pubmed: 19908194
Geospat Health. 2014 Nov;9(1):193-201
pubmed: 25545936
Parasitol Res. 2011 Aug;109 Suppl 1:S87-96
pubmed: 21739378
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):131-6
pubmed: 19923480
Vet Parasitol. 2001 Dec 13;102(3):243-52
pubmed: 11777604
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Oct;11(10):1618-20
pubmed: 16318709
Vet Parasitol. 2000 Aug 23;91(3-4):251-8
pubmed: 10940526
Res Vet Sci. 2009 Aug;87(1):36-8
pubmed: 19217126
Eur J Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;8(2):273-6
pubmed: 1644148
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Jun 30;179(1-3):57-61
pubmed: 21349642
Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):193-7
pubmed: 15305715
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Mar 22;176(4):295-9
pubmed: 21300439
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Feb;13(2):256-64
pubmed: 18304273
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Oct;35:1-9
pubmed: 31279898
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Nov 24;182(1):14-21
pubmed: 21852040

Auteurs

Jairo Mendoza-Roldan (J)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.

Giovanni Benelli (G)

Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Rossella Panarese (R)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.

Roberta Iatta (R)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.

Tommaso Furlanello (T)

San Marco Veterinary Clinic and Laboratory, Veggiano, Padova, Italy.

Frederic Beugnet (F)

Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Lyon, France.

Andrea Zatelli (A)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy.

Domenico Otranto (D)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy. domenico.otranto@uniba.it.
Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. domenico.otranto@uniba.it.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH