Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology: Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve?
angiography
computed tomography
coronary artery disease
fractional flow reserve
hyperemia
intravascular imaging
Journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1941-7632
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101499602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
17
4
2020
pubmed:
17
4
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fractional flow reserve is the current invasive gold standard for assessing the ischemic potential of an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis. Procedural cost and time, the need for coronary vessel instrumentation, and the need to administer adenosine to achieve maximal hyperemia remain integral components of invasive fractional flow reserve. The number of new alternatives to fractional flow reserve has proliferated over the last ten years using techniques ranging from alternative pressure wire metrics to anatomic simulation via angiography or intravascular imaging. This review article provides a critical description of the currently available or under-development alternatives to fractional flow reserve with a special focus on the available evidence, pros, and cons for each with a view towards their clinical application in the near future for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32295416
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008487
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e008487Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn