Biliary Cannulation in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastrectomy: An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Successful Cannulation.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y
/ adverse effects
Balloon Enteroscopy
/ standards
Biliary Tract
Catheterization
/ standards
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
/ adverse effects
Female
Gastrectomy
/ standards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Ducts
/ surgery
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Retrospective Studies
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
factors associated with cannulation success
retroflex position
short-type single-balloon enteroscope
surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy
Journal
Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)
ISSN: 1349-7235
Titre abrégé: Intern Med
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9204241
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2020
15 Jul 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
4
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
17
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Objective We investigated the results of biliary cannulation using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope in patients with a native papilla who had previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastrectomy and analyzed the factors associated with successful cannulation. Methods The study subjects consisted of patients with a native papilla who had previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastrectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope at our institution between September 2011 and July 2019. We carried out a retrospective investigation of the outcomes, including assessing the success rate of biliary cannulation, and analyzed the factors associated with successful cannulation. Results In total, 78 patients underwent biliary cannulation of a native papilla. The success rate of biliary cannulation was 80.8% (88.5% when including success on repeated attempts). The success rate of the standard cannulation technique was 60.3%, with the use of advanced cannulation techniques to secure the pancreatic duct providing the same additional effect as a normal anatomy. Adverse events occurred in 9.0% of cases. A multivariate analysis of the Roux-en-Y gastrectomy patients found that cannulation was more likely to be successful in patients in whom the scope could be placed in the retroflex position (odds ratio: 7.88, 95% confidence interval: 2.19-37.77, p<0.001). Conclusion Selective biliary cannulation using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope in patients with a native papilla who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastrectomy was effective and safe. The retroflex position provided a good papilla field of view and improved the success rate of biliary cannulation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32296000
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4245-19
pmc: PMC7434537
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1687-1693Références
JGH Open. 2019 Jul 19;4(2):296-298
pubmed: 32280784
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):377-86.e6
pubmed: 26234697
Dig Endosc. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 2:156-63
pubmed: 24750167
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Dec;6(12):E1417-E1422
pubmed: 30505936
Dig Endosc. 2018 Nov;30(6):808-809
pubmed: 30085367
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54
pubmed: 20189503
Dig Endosc. 2010 Jan;22(1):64-8
pubmed: 20078669
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1750-1758
pubmed: 27670601
Endoscopy. 2012 Jul;44(7):674-83
pubmed: 22696192
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Dec;68(6):1112-6
pubmed: 18599052
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):160-5
pubmed: 26215648
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):634-641
pubmed: 24814775
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;34(6):1116-1122
pubmed: 30152138
Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):E229-E230
pubmed: 29895066
Dig Endosc. 2016 Apr;28 Suppl 1:62-9
pubmed: 26684083
Dig Endosc. 2014 May;26(3):442-9
pubmed: 23937334
Endoscopy. 2010 Aug;42(8):656-60
pubmed: 20589594
Endoscopy. 2007 Dec;39(12):1068-71
pubmed: 18072058
Dig Endosc. 2018 Apr;30 Suppl 1:67-74
pubmed: 29658650
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Feb;53(2):216-20
pubmed: 11174299
Dig Endosc. 2019 Nov;31(6):682-689
pubmed: 30942924
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):362-72, 372.e1
pubmed: 22248605
Endoscopy. 2017 Jan;49(1):69-74
pubmed: 27760436
Dig Endosc. 2018 Apr;30 Suppl 1:76-77
pubmed: 29658640
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 10;13:147
pubmed: 24112846
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):641-9
pubmed: 20189529
Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(1):82-6
pubmed: 25040667
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):585-91
pubmed: 18561917