Extinction training can make the extinction context a stimulus-specific inhibitor: A potential mechanism of experimental renewal.
conditioned inhibition
extinction
renewal
stimulus-specific inhibition
Journal
Learning and motivation
ISSN: 0023-9690
Titre abrégé: Learn Motiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0247267
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
17
4
2020
pubmed:
17
4
2020
medline:
17
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Renewal is the recovery of extinguished responding to a conditioned stimulus when testing occurs outside the extinction context. Renewal has been explained as the extinction context becoming a negative occasion setter during extinction. However, other mechanisms may contribute. Two recent studies showed (a) after extinction of a discrete cue, the extinction context can serve as a conditioned inhibitor, and (b) in some circumstances operational extinction of a conditioned inhibitor can reduce inhibition with respect to a transfer excitor while retaining inhibition with respect to the excitor used in inhibitory training. Here we examine the potential contribution of these phenomena to renewal. In the present experiment, all rats received fear-conditioning with a target cue in one context and extinction of that cue in a second context. Then half of the subjects received massive extinction of the extinction context (i.e., 24 h) while the other half received only handling. Finally, some subjects in each condition were tested for responding to the target cue in the extinction context, others in a second familiar context, and yet others in a third transfer context in which another fear cue had been extinguished. The results showed ABC renewal independent of whether subjects had or had not received context extinction. However, transfer of the inhibitory potential of the extinction context was observed only in subjects that did not receive context extinction. These results suggest an extinction context can serve as a stimulus-specific conditioned inhibitor, thereby contributing to renewal by decreasing responding to the target cue in an ABB control condition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32296250
doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101623
pmc: PMC7158866
mid: NIHMS1578667
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH033881
Pays : United States
Références
Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):80-99
pubmed: 8346330
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):248-65
pubmed: 6886630
Learn Behav. 2019 Nov 12;:
pubmed: 31721098
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):58-70
pubmed: 20822294
Learn Behav. 2012 Mar;40(1):24-33
pubmed: 21786176
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1959 Aug;52:415-9
pubmed: 14418647
Learn Mem. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):501-9
pubmed: 15466300
Behav Processes. 2017 Apr;137:64-72
pubmed: 27720958
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 May;86(5):837-45
pubmed: 4833588
Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):46-56
pubmed: 21264561