OPADIA Study: Is a Patient Questionnaire Useful for Enhancing Physician-Patient Shared Decision Making on Physical Activity Micro-objectives in Diabetes?
Diabetes mellitus
Patient centredness
Patient questionnaire
Physical activity
Physician empathy
Shared decision making
Type 2
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
14
02
2020
pubmed:
17
4
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
17
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Regular physical activity (PA) is recommended by all type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management guidelines. The OPADIA study aimed to determine whether using a specific patient questionnaire (Optima-PA©) could help T2DM patients increase their PA by leading to better physician-patient communication and improved levels of shared decision making concerning Specific, Measurable, Acceptable, Realistic, Timely (SMART)-PA micro-objectives. Physicians participating in this multicentre, prospective, randomised, real-life study were allocated to a standard group (T2DM patients managed according to usual clinical practice, n = 24) or the OPTIMA-PA group (additional use of the questionnaire, n = 30). The main outcome was the percentage of inclusion visits ending with the setting up of at least one SMART-PA micro-objective. Other outcomes were the impact of the OPTIMA-PA questionnaire on patient perceptions of shared decision making (ENTRED questionnaire) and the impact of the OPTIMA-PA questionnaire and establishing SMART-PA micro-objectives as well as patient-perceived physician empathy (ENTRED questionnaire) and GP aptitude for patient-centredness (SEPCQ scores) on patient PA levels over a 3-month period (IPAQ-SF scores). One hundred twenty-two patients were included in the standard group and 134 in the OPTIMA-PA group. Unexpectedly, more inclusion visits ended with SMART-PA micro-objectives being set up in the standard group (p < 0.001): 81.1% (n = 99/122) versus 59.7% (n = 80/134). However, fewer patients in the OPTIMA-PA group felt that GPs made decisions alone (32% versus 60%; p < 0.0001). Positive correlations were also observed between GP patient-centredness and patient-perceived GP empathy or increased patient PA over the study period. Although the OPTIMA-PA questionnaire did not directly promote setting up of SMART-PA micro-objectives in T2DM patients, the OPADIA study demonstrated that this tool was effective at improving patient-physician relationships by increasing patient involvement in therapeutic decision making. Our study also highlighted the importance of GP aptitude for patient-centredness for improving PA in T2DM patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32297283
doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01336-8
pii: 10.1007/s12325-020-01336-8
pmc: PMC7467497
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
2317-2336Références
Patrice Darmon P, Bauduceau B, Lyse Bordier L, Bringer J, Chabrier G, Charbonnel B, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: position statement of the Francophone Diabetes Society. Médecine des maladies Métaboliques. 2017;11(6):577–93.
doi: 10.1016/S1957-2557(17)30139-6
WHO. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Duclos M, Oppert JM, Verges B, Coliche V, Gautier JF, Guezennec Y, et al. Physical activity and type 2 diabetes. Recommandations of the SFD (Francophone Diabetes Society) diabetes and physical activity working group. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39(3):205–16.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.03.005
Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2065–79.
doi: 10.2337/dc16-1728
Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3(5):448–57.
doi: 10.1007/BF02595921
Grimaldi A, Penfornis A, Consoli S, Falissard B, Eymard E, Williams P, et al. Breaking barriers to effective type 2 diabetes management: findings from the use of the OPTIMA(c) questionnaire in clinical practice. Adv Ther. 2016;33(6):1033–48.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6
Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115
Zachariae R, O'Connor M, Lassesen B, Olesen M, Kjaer LB, Thygesen M, et al. The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness questionnaire—a new measure of medical student and physician confidence in exhibiting patient-centered behaviors. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:150.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0427-x
Tiv M, Viel JF, Mauny F, Eschwege E, Weill A, Fournier C, et al. Medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: the ENTRED study 2007, a French Population-Based Study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32412.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032412
Girerd X, Hanon O, Anagnostopoulos K, Ciupek C, Mourad JJ, Consoli S. Assessment of antihypertensive compliance using a self-administered questionnaire: development and use in a hypertension clinic [Article in French]. Presse Med. 2001;30(21):1044–8.
pubmed: 11471275
Invs. Résultats épidémiologiques principaux d’Entred-métropole—Etude Entred 2007–2010. 2019. https://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/Dossiers-thematiques/Maladies-chroniques-et-traumatismes/Diabete/Etudes-Entred/Etude-Entred-2007-2010/Resultats-epidemiologiques-principaux-d-Entred-metropole . Accessed 26 Mar 2020.
Cloix L, Caille A, Helmer C, Bourdel-Marchasson I, Fagot-Campagna A, Fournier C, et al. Physical activity at home, at leisure, during transportation and at work in French adults with type 2 diabetes: the ENTRED physical activity study. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41(1):37–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.07.003
HAS. Recommandation de bonne pratique—Stratégie médicamenteuse du contrôle glycémique du diabète de type 2. 2013. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-02/10irp04_reco_diabete_type_2.pdf . Accessed 26 Mar 2020.
Oswald D, Sherrat F, Smith S. Handling the Hawthorne effect: The challenges surrounding a participant observer. Review of Social Studies. 2014;1(1).
Duclos M, Dejager S, Postel-Vinay N, di Nicola S, Quere S, Fiquet B. Physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension—insights into motivations and barriers from the MOBILE study. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:361–71.
pubmed: 26170686
pmcid: 4492639
Lanhers C, Duclos M, Guttmann A, Coudeyre E, Pereira B, Ouchchane L. General practitioners' barriers to prescribe physical activity: the dark side of the cluster effects on the physical activity of their type 2 diabetes patients. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140429.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140429
Freedson P, Miller K. Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71:S21–S30.
doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082782
Holmstrom I, Roing M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(2):167–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.008
Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018;61(12):2461–98.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5