Association of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in the Gut Microbiome With Clinical Response to Treatment With Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab in Patients With Solid Cancer Tumors.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
Fatty Acids, Volatile
/ analysis
Female
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
/ drug effects
Humans
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Nivolumab
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2020
01 04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
17
4
2020
pubmed:
17
4
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has been remarkably effective for treating multiple cancer types, and the gut microbiome is a possible factor affecting immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. However, the association between the gut microbiome and immune status of the tumor microenvironment remains unclear. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are major end product metabolites produced by the gut microbiota and have wide-ranging impacts on host physiology. To evaluate fecal and plasma SCFAs in patients with solid cancer tumors treated with programmed cell death-1 inhibitors (PD-1i). This was a prospective cohort biomarker study of patients with cancer who planned therapy with PD-1i at Kyoto University Hospital between July 2016 and February 2019. Data were analyzed from October 2019 to February 2020. Patients who were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab were classified into 2 groups based on their treatment response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1: responders who achieved an objective response and nonresponders. Dietary information in terms of intake frequency was obtained. Concentrations of SCFAs in fecal and plasma samples collected before PD-1i administration were measured using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. The concentration of SCFAs and progression-free survival. Among 52 patients enrolled, the median (range) patient age was 67 (27-84) years, and 23 (44%) were women. Median (range) duration of follow-up of the survivors after administration of PD-1i was 2.0 (0.4-4.1) years. The overall response rate was 28.8%. High concentrations of some SCFAs were associated with longer progression-free survival. These included fecal acetic acid (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15-0.54), propionic acid (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.20), butyric acid (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.60), valeric acid (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.98), and plasma isovaleric acid (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-0.99). Results of this study suggest that fecal SCFA concentrations may associated with PD-1i efficacy; thus, SCFAs may be the link between the gut microbiota and PD-1i efficacy. Because fecal examinations are completely noninvasive, they may be applicable for routine monitoring of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32297948
pii: 2764580
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2895
pmc: PMC7163404
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Fatty Acids, Volatile
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e202895Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 19;116(8):3118-3125
pubmed: 30718396
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 26;8(1):14430
pubmed: 30258117
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
Science. 2013 Aug 2;341(6145):569-73
pubmed: 23828891
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Nature. 2013 Dec 19;504(7480):451-5
pubmed: 24226773
Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):657-61
pubmed: 19523724
Science. 2011 Oct 7;334(6052):105-8
pubmed: 21885731
Science. 2018 Jan 5;359(6371):104-108
pubmed: 29302014
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jan;19(1):29-41
pubmed: 27928878
Gut. 1987 Oct;28(10):1221-7
pubmed: 3678950
Oncotarget. 2017 May 17;8(47):83155-83170
pubmed: 29137331
Clin Epigenetics. 2017 May 30;9:59
pubmed: 28572863
Oncogene. 2015 Dec 3;34(49):5960-70
pubmed: 25745993
Anal Sci. 2018 Sep 10;34(9):1031-1036
pubmed: 30078818
Epigenomics. 2016 Mar;8(3):415-28
pubmed: 26950532
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015 Nov;362(21):
pubmed: 26420851
Nutrients. 2019 Oct 07;11(10):
pubmed: 31591348
mBio. 2019 Jan 29;10(1):
pubmed: 30696735
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14691-6
pubmed: 20679230
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0201073
pubmed: 30052654
Science. 2018 Jan 5;359(6371):97-103
pubmed: 29097493
Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 28;6:6342
pubmed: 25919227
Science. 2018 Jan 5;359(6371):91-97
pubmed: 29097494
Microorganisms. 2019 Mar 13;7(3):
pubmed: 30871249
J Biosci. 2002 Dec;27(7):703-14
pubmed: 12571376
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Dec;3(12):1375-85
pubmed: 26297712
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 9;9(1):105
pubmed: 29317660
Nature. 2013 Dec 19;504(7480):446-50
pubmed: 24226770