Faster might not be better: Pictures may not elicit a stronger unconscious priming effect than words when modulated by semantic similarity.
Consciousness
Priming
Semantic priming
Semantic processing
Semantic similarity
Unconscious
Visual masking
Journal
Consciousness and cognition
ISSN: 1090-2376
Titre abrégé: Conscious Cogn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9303140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2019
revised:
05
04
2020
accepted:
06
04
2020
pubmed:
17
4
2020
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
17
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It has been suggested that unconscious semantic processing is stimulus-dependent, and that pictures might have privileged access to semantic content. Those findings led to the hypothesis that unconscious semantic priming effect for pictorial stimuli would be stronger as compared to verbal stimuli. This effect was tested on pictures and words by manipulating the semantic similarity between the prime and target stimuli. Participants performed a masked priming categorization task for either words or pictures with three semantic similarity conditions: strongly similar, weakly similar, and non-similar. Significant differences in reaction times were only found between strongly similar and non-similar and between weakly similar and non-similar, for both pictures and words, with faster overall responses for pictures as compared to words. Nevertheless, pictures showed no superior priming effect over words. This could suggest the hypothesis that even though semantic processing is faster for pictures, this does not imply a stronger unconscious priming effect.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32298956
pii: S1053-8100(19)30319-8
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102932
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102932Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.