How urban densification shapes walking behaviours in older community dwellers: a cross-sectional analysis of potential pathways of influence.
Built environment
High-density environment
Mediation analysis
Older adults
Walkability
Walking for transport and recreation
Journal
International journal of health geographics
ISSN: 1476-072X
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Geogr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101152198
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 04 2020
16 04 2020
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
accepted:
09
04
2020
entrez:
18
4
2020
pubmed:
18
4
2020
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Population growth, population ageing, and urbanisation are major global demographic trends that call for an examination of the impact of urban densification on older adults' health-enhancing behaviours, such as walking. No studies have examined the pathways through which urban densification may affect older adults' walking. This information is key to evidence-based, health-oriented urban and transport planning. This study aimed to identify neighbourhood environment characteristics potentially responsible for the effects of neighbourhood densification on older adults' frequency and amount of transportation and recreation walking within and outside the neighbourhood. The Active Lifestyle and the Environment in Chinese Seniors (ALECS) project collected self-reported data from 909 older adults (≥ 65 years) living in 128 physically and socially diverse neighbourhoods in Hong Kong (71% response rate). Walking was measured using the Neighbourhood Walking Questionnaire for Chinese Seniors. Objective residential density and other neighbourhood environmental attributes were assessed using Geographic Information Systems. Generalised additive mixed models examined the total effects of neighbourhood residential density on walking and the mediating role of other environmental attributes and car ownership. A complex network of potential pathways of positive and negative influences of neighbourhood residential density on different aspects of walking was revealed. While residential density was positively related to within-neighbourhood transportation and outside-neighbourhood recreation walking only, it exhibited positive and/or negative nonlinear indirect effects on all examined aspects of walking via recreation, public transport, food/retail and street intersection densities, and/or car ownership. High-density environments appear to support within-neighbourhood walking by providing access to food and retail outlets via well-connected street networks and discouraging car ownership. However, extreme density may lead to reductions in walking. Public transport density accompanying high-density areas may facilitate outside-neighbourhood walking but deter within-neighbourhood walking. The development of activity-friendly communities for ageing populations need to consider these opposing influences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Population growth, population ageing, and urbanisation are major global demographic trends that call for an examination of the impact of urban densification on older adults' health-enhancing behaviours, such as walking. No studies have examined the pathways through which urban densification may affect older adults' walking. This information is key to evidence-based, health-oriented urban and transport planning. This study aimed to identify neighbourhood environment characteristics potentially responsible for the effects of neighbourhood densification on older adults' frequency and amount of transportation and recreation walking within and outside the neighbourhood.
METHODS
The Active Lifestyle and the Environment in Chinese Seniors (ALECS) project collected self-reported data from 909 older adults (≥ 65 years) living in 128 physically and socially diverse neighbourhoods in Hong Kong (71% response rate). Walking was measured using the Neighbourhood Walking Questionnaire for Chinese Seniors. Objective residential density and other neighbourhood environmental attributes were assessed using Geographic Information Systems. Generalised additive mixed models examined the total effects of neighbourhood residential density on walking and the mediating role of other environmental attributes and car ownership.
RESULTS
A complex network of potential pathways of positive and negative influences of neighbourhood residential density on different aspects of walking was revealed. While residential density was positively related to within-neighbourhood transportation and outside-neighbourhood recreation walking only, it exhibited positive and/or negative nonlinear indirect effects on all examined aspects of walking via recreation, public transport, food/retail and street intersection densities, and/or car ownership.
CONCLUSIONS
High-density environments appear to support within-neighbourhood walking by providing access to food and retail outlets via well-connected street networks and discouraging car ownership. However, extreme density may lead to reductions in walking. Public transport density accompanying high-density areas may facilitate outside-neighbourhood walking but deter within-neighbourhood walking. The development of activity-friendly communities for ageing populations need to consider these opposing influences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32299439
doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00210-8
pii: 10.1186/s12942-020-00210-8
pmc: PMC7164360
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14Références
J Urban Health. 2013 Feb;90(1):56-66
pubmed: 22678651
Health Place. 2016 Nov;42:1-10
pubmed: 27598435
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 29;16(1):116
pubmed: 31783867
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 7;14(1):103
pubmed: 28784183
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 21;13:53
pubmed: 27105954
Prev Med. 2006 Jun;42(6):455-9
pubmed: 16574208
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(Suppl 7):626
pubmed: 28185601
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 10;16(5):
pubmed: 30857372
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):76-88
pubmed: 22227735
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Feb 6;14(1):15
pubmed: 28166790
J Transp Health. 2019 Mar;12:336-348
pubmed: 31534907
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;47(4):505-14
pubmed: 21384121
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 26;16(1):
pubmed: 30587821
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 05;6(1):e010384
pubmed: 26733574
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2207-17
pubmed: 27045735
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Oct;61(10):1830-2
pubmed: 24117303
Sports Med. 2018 Jul;48(7):1635-1660
pubmed: 29721838
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112515
pubmed: 31473573
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 24;166(14):1498-504
pubmed: 16864760
J Transp Health. 2016 Dec;3(4):467-478
pubmed: 28111613
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e030075
pubmed: 31401609
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Oct 25;13:43
pubmed: 25343966
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Mar 27;27(4):553–564
pubmed: 30676201
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 09;16(22):
pubmed: 31717514
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(1):121-129
pubmed: 28575195
Int J Health Geogr. 2012 Oct 10;11:43
pubmed: 23046604
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Nov 25;7:84
pubmed: 21108800
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;25:1-9
pubmed: 29751887
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jun 20;10:78
pubmed: 23782627
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jul;27(1):67-76
pubmed: 15212778
Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:703-11
pubmed: 26397775
Health Psychol. 2008 Mar;27(2S):S99-S100
pubmed: 18377161
Health Place. 2019 Nov;60:102206
pubmed: 31797770
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:282-293
pubmed: 29966823
J Phys Act Health. 2013 May;10(4):581-601
pubmed: 22975776
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr;100(4):654-60
pubmed: 20167887
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):99-109
pubmed: 29554353
Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102137
pubmed: 31176106
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:304-12
pubmed: 25017579
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Dec;46(12):2253-64
pubmed: 24781892
Prev Med. 2013 Jan;56(1):86-9
pubmed: 23137445
J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Jan;23(1):144-52
pubmed: 24589509
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;44(13):924-33
pubmed: 19406732
BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 09;11:851
pubmed: 22070768