An Analysis of Anesthesia Induction Dosing in Female Older Adults.
Journal
Drugs & aging
ISSN: 1179-1969
Titre abrégé: Drugs Aging
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9102074
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
4
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
entrez:
18
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the context of an aging surgical population, appropriate anesthetic induction dose adjustments for the older adult remain poorly defined. In the present study, we describe the prevalence of excess induction agent dose in reference to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and seek to investigate the possible association of such excess dose with postinduction hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). A retrospective observational study was conducted in a large tertiary teaching hospital in accordance with our a priori analytic protocol as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03699696). For inclusion, patients had to be 65 years or older and to have received general anesthesia with propofol induction for gynecologic oncology surgery between December 1, 2014 and July 8, 2018. Descriptive variables of the patients, machine-captured perioperative vital signs, induction anesthetic, and vasopressor/inotrope administrations were recorded. A total of 541 female patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (standard deviation) age of the cohort was 72.20 (5.93) years. Regarding the primary outcome, 65.43% (354 patients, 95% confidence interval 61.2-69.4) of the cohort received more than the FDA recommended 1-1.5 mg/kg induction dose for patients of advanced age undergoing general anesthesia. The percentage of patients receiving doses in excess of the FDA guidance remained substantial across all age groups, but decreased progressively with increasing 5-year age intervals (from 74% among those aged 65-69 years to 44% among those aged > 80 years). Excess propofol dose in the present cohort was not associated with our a priori definition of postinduction hypotension. Regarding AKI, among the 30 patients suffering this outcome, it occurred less often in patients who received higher propofol doses (4.1% [9/217] vs. 15.3% [21/138], p < 0.001), a result that may have been confounded by differential rates of missingness. Older adults commonly receive propofol induction doses in excess of the FDA guidance. The immediate hemodynamic effects of these doses on postinduction hypotension were not seen in the present cohort, suggesting that propofol dose adjustments may serve as a marker of physicians' judgments as to the frailty of patients. The relevance of the AKI association is difficult to interpret due to the non-differential missingness of AKI data between the two groups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
In the context of an aging surgical population, appropriate anesthetic induction dose adjustments for the older adult remain poorly defined. In the present study, we describe the prevalence of excess induction agent dose in reference to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and seek to investigate the possible association of such excess dose with postinduction hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI).
STUDY DESIGN
A retrospective observational study was conducted in a large tertiary teaching hospital in accordance with our a priori analytic protocol as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03699696). For inclusion, patients had to be 65 years or older and to have received general anesthesia with propofol induction for gynecologic oncology surgery between December 1, 2014 and July 8, 2018. Descriptive variables of the patients, machine-captured perioperative vital signs, induction anesthetic, and vasopressor/inotrope administrations were recorded.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
A total of 541 female patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (standard deviation) age of the cohort was 72.20 (5.93) years. Regarding the primary outcome, 65.43% (354 patients, 95% confidence interval 61.2-69.4) of the cohort received more than the FDA recommended 1-1.5 mg/kg induction dose for patients of advanced age undergoing general anesthesia.
RESULTS
The percentage of patients receiving doses in excess of the FDA guidance remained substantial across all age groups, but decreased progressively with increasing 5-year age intervals (from 74% among those aged 65-69 years to 44% among those aged > 80 years). Excess propofol dose in the present cohort was not associated with our a priori definition of postinduction hypotension. Regarding AKI, among the 30 patients suffering this outcome, it occurred less often in patients who received higher propofol doses (4.1% [9/217] vs. 15.3% [21/138], p < 0.001), a result that may have been confounded by differential rates of missingness.
CONCLUSIONS
Older adults commonly receive propofol induction doses in excess of the FDA guidance. The immediate hemodynamic effects of these doses on postinduction hypotension were not seen in the present cohort, suggesting that propofol dose adjustments may serve as a marker of physicians' judgments as to the frailty of patients. The relevance of the AKI association is difficult to interpret due to the non-differential missingness of AKI data between the two groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32300966
doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00760-3
pii: 10.1007/s40266-020-00760-3
pmc: PMC7359723
mid: NIHMS1585601
doi:
Substances chimiques
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03699696']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
435-446Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG059607
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : UL1 RR024139
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Références
JAMA. 2019 Feb 26;321(8):762-772
pubmed: 30806696
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010 Feb;12(1):39-45
pubmed: 20425309
JAMA. 1961 Oct 21;178:261-6
pubmed: 13887881
Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):307-19
pubmed: 26083768
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R31
pubmed: 17331245
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Aug;33(8):1987-2002
pubmed: 21915942
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Sep;29(3):377-88
pubmed: 21871400
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27
pubmed: 9431328
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):243-50
pubmed: 26360960
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:208-15
pubmed: 27555166
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1080-1089
pubmed: 29661385
Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:35-44
pubmed: 24303859
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):47-65
pubmed: 27792044
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):626-33
pubmed: 19433995
Anesthesiology. 2007 Dec;107(6):892-902
pubmed: 18043057
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Apr;28(2):247-54
pubmed: 23962461
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1346-1357
pubmed: 28973220
Drugs Aging. 2016 Oct;33(10):737-746
pubmed: 27581549
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jun;126(6):1053-1063
pubmed: 28383323
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jul;113(1):57-62
pubmed: 20861415
Anaesthesia. 2010 Aug;65(8):778-80
pubmed: 20649919
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1176-81
pubmed: 19352149
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2005 May-Jun;39(3):237-41
pubmed: 15915608
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;121(4):706-721
pubmed: 30236233
Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1360-9
pubmed: 24071617
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1749-57
pubmed: 20863334
Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):515-23
pubmed: 26181335
Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R79
pubmed: 19463152
Gerontology. 2011;57(6):559-64
pubmed: 21311170
Anaesthesia. 2001 Feb;56(2):108-13
pubmed: 11167469
Anesthesiology. 2016 Oct;125(4):656-66
pubmed: 27483124
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(6):477-500
pubmed: 18540688
Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1502-16
pubmed: 10360845
Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1231-9
pubmed: 26332856
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jan;57(1):6-14
pubmed: 14678335
Clin Ther. 2015 Dec 1;37(12):2676-85
pubmed: 26548320
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):2079-90
pubmed: 19384211
Anesthesiology. 2016 Nov;125(5):904-913
pubmed: 27606930
Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1517-27
pubmed: 10360846
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Dec;43:77-83
pubmed: 29055803
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R204-12
pubmed: 15312219
Anesth Analg. 2017 Oct;125(4):1203-1211
pubmed: 28759483
Anesth Analg. 2013 Jun;116(6):1380-5
pubmed: 22504213
Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):507-15
pubmed: 23835589
Anesthesiology. 2009 Mar;110(3):505-15
pubmed: 19212261
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):666-671
pubmed: 29277298