Cobalt ion interaction with TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel: Inhibition and potentiation.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
04
02
2020
accepted:
01
04
2020
entrez:
18
4
2020
pubmed:
18
4
2020
medline:
16
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
TMEM16A, a Ca2+-sensitive Cl- channel, plays key roles in many physiological functions related to Cl- transport across lipid membranes. Activation of this channel is mediated via binding intracellular Ca2+ to the channel with a relatively high apparent affinity, roughly in the sub-μM to low μM concentration range. Recently available high-resolution structures of TMEM16 molecules reveal that the high-affinity Ca2+ activation sites are formed by several acidic amino acids, using their negatively charged sidechain carboxylates to coordinate the bound Ca2+. In this study, we examine the interaction of TMEM16A with a divalent cation, Co2+, which by itself cannot activate current in TMEM16A. This divalent cation, however, has two effects when applied intracellularly. It inhibits the Ca2+-induced TMEM16A current by competing with Ca2+ for the aforementioned high-affinity activation sites. In addition, Co2+ also potentiates the Ca2+-induced current with a low affinity. This potentiation effect requires high concentration (mM) of Co2+, similar to our previous findings that high concentrations (mM) of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) can induce more TMEM16A current after the Ca2+-activation sites are saturated by tens of μM [Ca2+]i. The degrees of potentiation by Co2+ and Ca2+ also roughly correlate with each other. Interestingly, mutating a pore residue of TMEM16A, Y589, alters the degree of potentiation in that the smaller the sidechain of the replaced residue, the larger the potentiation induced by divalent cations. We suggest that the Co2+ potentiation and the Ca2+ potentiation share a similar mechanism by increasing Cl- flux through the channel pore, perhaps due to an increase of positive pore potential after the binding of divalent cations to phospholipids in the pore. A smaller sidechain of a pore residue may allow the pore to accommodate more phospholipids, thus enhancing the current potentiation caused by high concentrations of divalent cations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32302365
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231812
pii: PONE-D-20-03301
pmc: PMC7164836
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anoctamins
0
Chloride Channel Agonists
0
Ions
0
Mutant Proteins
0
Cobalt
3G0H8C9362
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231812Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM065447
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):14049-14054
pubmed: 27872308
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 24;108(21):8891-6
pubmed: 21555582
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2010 Oct;299(4):L585-94
pubmed: 20675434
Pflugers Arch. 2016 Mar;468(3):455-73
pubmed: 26739711
J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105-32
pubmed: 7108955
Elife. 2015 Jun 09;4:e06901
pubmed: 26057829
Cell. 2008 Sep 19;134(6):1019-29
pubmed: 18805094
Elife. 2019 Feb 20;8:
pubmed: 30785399
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1972;24:107-23
pubmed: 4566650
J Gen Physiol. 2018 Jul 2;150(7):933-947
pubmed: 29915161
Annu Rev Physiol. 2017 Feb 10;79:119-143
pubmed: 27860832
Elife. 2014 Jun 30;3:
pubmed: 24980701
J Gen Physiol. 1981 Apr;77(4):445-73
pubmed: 7241089
Cell Rep. 2019 Jul 9;28(2):567-579.e4
pubmed: 31291589
J Biol Chem. 2013 May 10;288(19):13305-16
pubmed: 23532839
Elife. 2017 Sep 16;6:
pubmed: 28917060
Elife. 2017 May 31;6:
pubmed: 28561733
J Gen Physiol. 2016 Nov;148(5):393-404
pubmed: 27799319
Nature. 2010 Dec 9;468(7325):834-8
pubmed: 21107324
J Gen Physiol. 2014 Jul;144(1):115-24
pubmed: 24981232
J Gen Physiol. 2009 Jan;133(1):43-58
pubmed: 19088381
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 2;109(40):16354-9
pubmed: 22988107
Elife. 2018 Oct 12;7:
pubmed: 30311910
Science. 2008 Oct 24;322(5901):590-4
pubmed: 18772398
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Jul 20;645(2):279-92
pubmed: 7272290
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):E1667-E1674
pubmed: 29382763
J Neurosci. 2009 May 27;29(21):6809-18
pubmed: 19474308
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Feb;10(2):M110.004697
pubmed: 20974900
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Jul 20;645(2):170-6
pubmed: 7272287
J Gen Physiol. 2009 Jan;133(1):59-68
pubmed: 19088382
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21413-8
pubmed: 19965375
Nature. 2008 Oct 30;455(7217):1210-5
pubmed: 18724360
J Gen Physiol. 2016 Nov;148(5):375-392
pubmed: 27799318
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):11776-81
pubmed: 19561302
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2018 Mar;1863(3):299-312
pubmed: 29277655
J Physiol. 2009 Oct 15;587(Pt 20):4887-904
pubmed: 19687122
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86734
pubmed: 24489780
Nature. 2017 Dec 21;552(7685):426-429
pubmed: 29236684
Blood. 2011 Apr 21;117(16):4399-400
pubmed: 21511967
J Biol Chem. 2009 Nov 27;284(48):33360-8
pubmed: 19819874
Nature. 2017 Dec 21;552(7685):421-425
pubmed: 29236691
J Biol Chem. 2016 Sep 23;291(39):20345-52
pubmed: 27510033
Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:719-58
pubmed: 15709976
Circ Res. 2012 Mar 30;110(7):990-9
pubmed: 22394518
J Gen Physiol. 2019 Apr 1;151(4):518-531
pubmed: 30670476
Nature. 2014 Dec 11;516(7530):207-12
pubmed: 25383531
Elife. 2019 Jan 16;8:
pubmed: 30648972
Prog Lipid Res. 2016 Oct;64:69-84
pubmed: 27528189