Delayed hospital admission of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical presentation, treatment strategies, and outcome.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Brain Infarction
/ etiology
Computed Tomography Angiography
Critical Care
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Nervous System Diseases
/ etiology
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ methods
Patient Admission
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Seizures
/ etiology
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
/ complications
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Vasospasm, Intracranial
/ etiology
Young Adult
cerebral infarction
clipping
coiling
delayed cerebral ischemia
modified Rankin Scale
propensity score
vascular disorders
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2020
17 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
14
01
2020
accepted:
19
02
2020
pubmed:
18
4
2020
medline:
31
7
2021
entrez:
18
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Timely aneurysm occlusion and neurointensive care treatment are key principles in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) to prevent secondary brain injury. Patients with early (EHA) and delayed hospital admission (DHA) were compared in terms of clinical presentation, treatment strategies, aSAH-related complications, and outcome. In this retrospective study, consecutive aSAH patients were treated at a single neurovascular center between 2009 and 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to account for divergent baseline characteristics. Among 509 included patients, 55 were admitted more than 48 hours after ictus (DHA group). DHA patients were significantly younger (52 ± 11 vs 56 ± 14 years, p = 0.03) and had lower World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scores (p < 0.01) than EHA patients. In 54.5% of the cases, DHA patients presented with neurological deterioration or aggravated symptoms. Propensity score matching revealed a higher vasospastic infarction rate in the DHA group (41.5%) than in the EHA group (22.6%) (p = 0.04). A similar portion of patients in both groups achieved favorable outcome at midterm follow-up (77.3% vs 73.6%, p = 0.87). DHA patients (62.3%) received conventional coiling more often than EHA patients (41.5%) (p = 0.03). DHA patients are at an increased risk of cerebral infarction. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art neurointensive care treatment can result in a good clinical outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32302985
doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS20148
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM