CT-guided discitis-osteomyelitis biopsies: needle gauge and microbiology results.


Journal

Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 18 12 2019
accepted: 02 04 2020
revised: 25 03 2020
pubmed: 20 4 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 20 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the microbiology results and needle gauge for CT-guided biopsies of suspected discitis-osteomyelitis. All CT-guided biopsies performed for suspected discitis-osteomyelitis at our institution between 2002 and 2019 were reviewed. Biopsy location, needle type and gauge, microbiology, pathology, and clinical and imaging follow-up were obtained through chart review. Yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. A pairwise analysis of different needle gauges was also performed with calculations of odds ratios. Naïve Bayes predictive modeling was performed. 241 (age: 59 ± 18 years; 88 [35%] F, 162 [65%] M) biopsies were performed. There were 3 (1%) 11 gauge (G), and 13 (5%) 12-G biopsies; 23 (10%) 13-G biopsies; 75 (31%) 14-G biopsies; and 90 (37%) 16-G, 33 (14%) 18-G, and 4 (2%) 20 G biopsies. True disease status (presence of infection) was determined via either pathology findings (205, 86%) or clinical and imaging follow-up (36, 14%). The most common true positive pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (31, 33%). Overall biopsy yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 39%, 56%, 89%, and 66%, respectively. Pooled biopsy yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was 56%, 69%, 71%, and 69% for 11-13-G needles and 36%, 53%, 91%, and 65% for 14-20-G needles, respectively, with an odds ratio between the two groups of 2.29 (P = 0.021). Pooled biopsy yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was 48%, 63%, 85%, and 68% for 11-14-G needles and 32%, 49%, 91%, and 64% for 16-20-G needles, respectively, with an odds ratio between the two groups of 2.02 (P = 0.0086). The use of a larger inner bore diameter/lower gauge biopsy needle may increase the likelihood of culturing the causative microorganism for CT-guided biopsies of discitis-osteomyelitis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32306072
doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03439-3
pii: 10.1007/s00256-020-03439-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1431-1439

Références

Sobottke R, Seifert H, Fätkenheuer G, Schmidt M, Gossmann A, Eysel P. Current diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105(10):181–7.
pubmed: 19629222 pmcid: 2696793
Carragee EJ, Kim D, van der Vlugt T, Vittum D. The clinical use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine. 1997;22(18):2089–93.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199709150-00005
Khan MH, Smith PN, Rao N, Donaldson WF. Serum C-reactive protein levels correlate with clinical response in patients treated with antibiotics for wound infections after spinal surgery. Spine J. 2006;6(3):311–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.006
Conrad DA. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. Pediatr Rev. 2010;31(11):464–71.
doi: 10.1542/pir.31-11-464
Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA. MR imaging findings in spinal infections: rules or myths? Radiology. 2003;228(2):506–14.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2282020752
Zimmerli W. Clinical practice. Vertebral osteomyelitis N Engl J Med. 2010;362(11):1022–9.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0910753
Corrah TW, Enoch DA, Aliyu SH, Lever AM. Bacteraemia and subsequent vertebral osteomyelitis: a retrospective review of 125 patients. QJM. 2011;104(3):201–7.
doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq178
Mylona E, Samarkos M, Kakalou E, Fanourgiakis P, Skoutelis A. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: a systematic review of clinical characteristics. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009;39(1):10–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.03.002
Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ, Darouiche RO, Widmer AF, Schmitt SK, et al. 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(6):e26–46.
doi: 10.1093/cid/civ482
McNamara AL, Dickerson EC, Gomez-Hassan DM, Cinti SK, Srinivasan A. Yield of image-guided needle biopsy for infectious discitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(10):2021–7.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5337
Michel SCA, Pfirrmann CWA, Boos N, Hodler J. CT-guided core biopsy of subchondral bone and intervertebral space in suspected spondylodiskitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):977–80.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0109
Marschall J, Bhavan KP, Olsen MA, Fraser VJ, Wright NM, Warren DK. The impact of prebiopsy antibiotics on pathogen recovery in hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(7):867–72.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cir062
Enoch DA, Cargill JS, Laing R, Herbert S, Corrah TW, Brown NM. Value of CT-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of septic discitis. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61(6):750–3.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.054296
Chew FS, Kline MJ. Diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous aspiration procedures in suspected spontaneous infectious diskitis. Radiology. 2001;218(1):211–4.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja06211
Rankine JJ, Barron DA, Robinson P, Millner PA, Dickson RA. Therapeutic impact of percutaneous spinal biopsy in spinal infection. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(948):607–9.
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.017863
D’Agostino C, Scorzolini L, Massetti AP, Carnevalini M, d’Ettorre G, Venditti M, et al. A seven-year prospective study on spondylodiscitis: epidemiological and microbiological features. Infection. 2010;38(2):102–7.
doi: 10.1007/s15010-009-9340-8
Joo E-J, Yeom J-S, Ha YE, Park SY, Lee C-S, Kim E-S, et al. Diagnostic yield of computed tomography-guided bone biopsy and clinical outcomes of tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis. Korean J Intern Med. 2016;31(4):762–71.
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2013.019
Garg V, Kosmas C, Young PC, Togaru UK, Robbin MR. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy for vertebral osteomyelitis: a department’s experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(2):E10.
doi: 10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14134
Czuczman GJ, Marrero DE, Huang AJ, Mandell JC, Ghazikhanian V, Simeone FJ. Diagnostic yield of repeat CT-guided biopsy for suspected infectious spondylodiscitis. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47(10):1403–10.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2972-y
Terreaux W, Geoffroy M, Ohl X, Job L, Cart P, Eschard J-P, et al. Diagnostic contribution of a second percutaneous needle biopsy in patients with spontaneous diskitis and negative blood cultures and first biopsy. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83(6):715–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.02.006
McHenry MC, Easley KA, Locker GA. Vertebral osteomyelitis: long-term outcome for 253 patients from 7 Cleveland-area hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(10):1342–50.
doi: 10.1086/340102
Pigrau C, Almirante B, Flores X, Falco V, Rodríguez D, Gasser I, et al. Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and endocarditis: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Am J Med. 2005;118(11):1287.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.02.027
Huang AJ, Kattapuram SV. Musculoskeletal neoplasms: biopsy and intervention. Radiol Clin N Am. 2011;49(6):1287–305 vii.
doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2011.07.010
Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(5):644–9.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00002
Wu JS, Gorbachova T, Morrison WB, Haims AH, Js W, Gorbachova T, et al. Imaging-guided bone biopsy for osteomyelitis: are there factors associated with positive or negative cultures? AJR. 2007;188:1529–34.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.1286
Chang CY, Simeone FJ, Nelson SB, Taneja AK, Huang AJ. Is Biopsying the paravertebral soft tissue as effective as biopsying the disk or vertebral endplate? 10-year retrospective review of CT-guided biopsy of diskitis-osteomyelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(1):123–9.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13545
Wu JS, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ, Shetty SK, Hochman MG. Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? Radiology. 2008;248(3):962–70.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071742

Auteurs

Jad S Husseini (JS)

Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. jad.husseini@mgh.harvard.edu.

F Joseph Simeone (FJ)

Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Sandra B Nelson (SB)

Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 20114, USA.

Connie Y Chang (CY)

Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH