Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
WaveOne file
scanning electron microscopic
self-adjusting file
smear layer
sodium hypochlorite
Journal
Contemporary clinical dentistry
ISSN: 0976-237X
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Dent
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101552967
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
21
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determined and roots were divided into two groups of 20 samples each: Group I - SAF and Group II - WO. All root canals were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The roots were sectioned longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopic examination. The amount of debris and smear layer was evaluated using five score index at coronal, middle and apical third levels. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and significance was set at a Statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in cleaning the apical third. Group I (SAF) showed better canal cleanliness compared to Group II (WO) in the apical third. Within the limitations of this study, SAF in combination with 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA irrigating solution had significantly better cleaning efficacy in the apical third of root canals when compared to WO rotary file system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32308334
doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19
pii: CCD-10-542
pmc: PMC7150549
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
542-547Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):697-702
pubmed: 20307746
J Endod. 2003 Mar;29(3):187-90
pubmed: 12669878
Int Endod J. 2000 May;33(3):186-93
pubmed: 11307434
Odontology. 2014 Jul;102(2):211-6
pubmed: 23568014
Int Endod J. 1997 Jul;30(4):279-82
pubmed: 9477814
J Endod. 2004 Aug;30(8):559-67
pubmed: 15273636
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):401-19
pubmed: 25298639
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):721-4
pubmed: 20307751
J Endod. 2013 Mar;39(3):398-401
pubmed: 23402515
Alpha Omegan. 2011 Spring;104(1-2):36-44
pubmed: 21905365
J Dent. 2003 May;31(4):275-81
pubmed: 12735922
Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):413-8
pubmed: 22188277
Int Endod J. 2009 Apr;42(4):288-302
pubmed: 19220510
J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1406-1409
pubmed: 18928858
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1572-5
pubmed: 24238449
J Endod. 2010 Dec;36(12):1983-7
pubmed: 21092817
J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):1067-70
pubmed: 23880279
J Endod. 1975 Jul;1(7):238-42
pubmed: 1061799
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):505-9
pubmed: 22414838
J Endod. 2013 Feb;39(2):163-72
pubmed: 23321225
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):701-5
pubmed: 21496675
J Endod. 1999 Feb;25(2):123-5
pubmed: 10204470
Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):363-9
pubmed: 20518928
Int Endod J. 1995 Jul;28(4):221-5
pubmed: 8595945
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):679-90
pubmed: 20307744
J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1140-4
pubmed: 22794223
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):200-4
pubmed: 26069404
Scanning. 2013 Mar-Apr;35(2):112-8
pubmed: 22833465
J Endod. 2014 Mar;40(3):446-50
pubmed: 24565669
J Endod. 1997 May;23(5):301-6
pubmed: 9545932
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;20(6):451-458
pubmed: 29430100