Evaluating the Implementation of Ontario's Organ and Tissue Donation Physician Leadership Model: Mapping a Way Forward.
implementation evaluation
leadership
organ and tissue donation
social network mapping
Journal
Journal of healthcare leadership
ISSN: 1179-3201
Titre abrégé: J Healthc Leadersh
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101614314
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
11
2019
accepted:
27
02
2020
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
21
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The demand for solid organ transplantation has spurred countries around the world to search for innovative policies and practices to increase the supply of organs. Spain has become a global reference point for organ donation with the highest transplantation rates. In Ontario, Canada the Ontario Trillium Gift of Life (TGLN) has sought to replicate some of the successes in Spain. In particular, TGLN's implementation of the Physician Leadership Model has been viewed as a promising strategy to improve donation conversion rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of TGLNs (TGLN) Physician Leadership Model by examining critical implementation process variables (education/training, communication, satisfaction, participation and reach). This mixed-method implementation evaluation included data from all members of the Physician Leadership Model including the Chief Medical Officer, five Regional Medical Leads (RMLs), and the 52 Hospital Donation Physicians (HDPs). Social Network Analysis (SNA) surveys were sent to all 52 HDPs and yielded an 85% rate. Analysis included constructing sociograms and qualitatively analyzing interviews. TGLN's PLM was poised for success by utilizing the existing RMLs' network as a foundation. The social network analysis measures, particularly participation and reach, indicated the PLM was quite dense (ie, the degree to which members are connected) at baseline. HDPs reported communication to be facilitated by their connections to their RMLs. Early evaluative data indicated that lack of education and training was viewed by HDPs as a barrier, and thus more capacity would need to be directed to this issue. Overall, HDPs reported that various intended outcomes were being met. We have demonstrated that an implementation evaluation helps us to understand which elements of the PLM were successful and which elements required immediate attention. This evaluation helped to highlight the successes and challenges in implementing the TGLN Physician Leadership Model in Ontario. Social network analysis of publicly funded capacity building systems has been identified as a promising area for health program evaluation to answer questions at a system level, such as identifying service provisions among information exchange networks and ultimately better health care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The demand for solid organ transplantation has spurred countries around the world to search for innovative policies and practices to increase the supply of organs. Spain has become a global reference point for organ donation with the highest transplantation rates. In Ontario, Canada the Ontario Trillium Gift of Life (TGLN) has sought to replicate some of the successes in Spain. In particular, TGLN's implementation of the Physician Leadership Model has been viewed as a promising strategy to improve donation conversion rates.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of TGLNs (TGLN) Physician Leadership Model by examining critical implementation process variables (education/training, communication, satisfaction, participation and reach).
METHODS
METHODS
This mixed-method implementation evaluation included data from all members of the Physician Leadership Model including the Chief Medical Officer, five Regional Medical Leads (RMLs), and the 52 Hospital Donation Physicians (HDPs). Social Network Analysis (SNA) surveys were sent to all 52 HDPs and yielded an 85% rate. Analysis included constructing sociograms and qualitatively analyzing interviews.
RESULTS
RESULTS
TGLN's PLM was poised for success by utilizing the existing RMLs' network as a foundation. The social network analysis measures, particularly participation and reach, indicated the PLM was quite dense (ie, the degree to which members are connected) at baseline. HDPs reported communication to be facilitated by their connections to their RMLs. Early evaluative data indicated that lack of education and training was viewed by HDPs as a barrier, and thus more capacity would need to be directed to this issue. Overall, HDPs reported that various intended outcomes were being met.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that an implementation evaluation helps us to understand which elements of the PLM were successful and which elements required immediate attention. This evaluation helped to highlight the successes and challenges in implementing the TGLN Physician Leadership Model in Ontario. Social network analysis of publicly funded capacity building systems has been identified as a promising area for health program evaluation to answer questions at a system level, such as identifying service provisions among information exchange networks and ultimately better health care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32308517
doi: 10.2147/JHL.S240488
pii: 240488
pmc: PMC7135194
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
27-34Informations de copyright
© 2020 Sarti et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Ms Angele Landriault reports grants from Trillium Gift of Life Network, during the conduct of the study. Dr Sonny Dhanani reports personal fees from TGLN, during the conduct of the study. Dr Andrew Healey reports personal fees from Trillium Gift of Life Network, outside the submitted work; Dr Pierre Cardinal report grants from Trillium Gift of Life (TGLN), during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
BMC Public Health. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):1212
pubmed: 27905904
Transpl Int. 2011 Apr;24(4):333-43
pubmed: 21210863
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Nov 09;8:761-767
pubmed: 29184460
J Community Psychol. 2010 Jul 1;38(5):656-668
pubmed: 24049217
J Nephrol. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):22-8
pubmed: 11936422
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
pubmed: 14568747
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):4-11
pubmed: 18718981