An Examination of an Interviewer-Respondent Matching Protocol in a Longitudinal CATI Study.
Computer-assisted telephone interviewing
Interviewer effects
Interviewer-respondent interaction
Survey nonresponse
Journal
Journal of survey statistics and methodology
ISSN: 2325-0984
Titre abrégé: J Surv Stat Methodol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101630209
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
21
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article presents results from an experimental study in Germany designed to test the effectiveness of a novel protocol for matching participants in a national panel survey with interviewers employing computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) on selected sociodemographic features, including sex, age, and education. We specifically focus on the ability of the protocol to engender close matches between respondents and interviewers in terms of these features, using both theory and empirical evidence to suggest that this type of matching will improve cooperation rates in surveys employing CATI. We also focus on indicators of "success" at first contact (defined as a successful interview or establishment of an appointment for an interview) as a function of whether the matching protocol was in use on a given day and whether specific types of matches generated higher rates of success overall. We find strong evidence of the protocol effectively establishing close matches, and we also observe that matches based on education proved especially effective for rates of "success" in a panel survey that focused primarily on labor market topics. We conclude with thoughts on practical implementation of this approach in other settings and suggested directions for future work in this area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32309459
doi: 10.1093/jssam/smy028
pii: smy028
pmc: PMC7147819
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
304-324Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Ann Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;9(3):188-95
pubmed: 10192651
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Sep;67:229-238
pubmed: 28888288