Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Follow-up Samples From Four Prospective Trials of the European MCL Network.
Journal
HemaSphere
ISSN: 2572-9241
Titre abrégé: Hemasphere
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101740619
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
16
10
2019
revised:
21
01
2020
accepted:
27
01
2020
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
21
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Minimal residual disease (MRD) has been increasingly investigated in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), including for individual therapeutic stratification and pre-emptive treatment in clinical trials. Although patient/allele specific real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of IGH or BCL1-IGH clonal markers is the gold-standard method, its reliance on a standard curve for relative quantification limits quantification of low-level positivity within the 1E-4 to 1E-5 range; over half of positive MRD samples after treatment fall below the quantitative range (BQR) of the standard curve. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), in contrast, allows absolute quantification, including for samples with no baseline determination of tumor infiltration by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC), avoiding the need for a reference standard curve. Using updated, optimized, ddPCR criteria we compared it with qPCR in 416 MRD samples (and with MFC in 63), with over-representation (61%) of BQR results by qPCR, from a total of 166 patients from four prospective MCL clinical trials. ddPCR, qPCR and MFC gave comparable results in MRD samples with at least 0.01% (1E-4) positivity. ddPCR was preferable to qPCR since it provided more robust quantification at positivity between 1E-4 and 1E-5. Amongst 240 BQR samples with duplicate or triplicate analysis, 39% were positive by ddPCR, 49% negative and only 12% remained positive below quantifiable ddPCR limits. The prognostic relevance of ddPCR is currently under assessment in the context of prospective trials within the European MCL Network.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32309784
doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000347
pii: HemaSphere-2019-0194
pmc: PMC7162081
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e347Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.
Références
Leukemia. 2019 Sep;33(9):2241-2253
pubmed: 31243313
Leukemia. 1997 Oct;11(10):1793-8
pubmed: 9324303
Leukemia. 2019 Sep;33(9):2227-2240
pubmed: 31197258
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Leukemia. 2003 Dec;17(12):2257-317
pubmed: 14671650
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1768:229-256
pubmed: 29717447
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W503-8
pubmed: 18503082
PLoS One. 2016 May 05;11(5):e0153317
pubmed: 27149415
Leukemia. 2000 Aug;14(8):1419-25
pubmed: 10942238
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):543
pubmed: 29323170
Clin Chem. 2015 Jan;61(1):79-88
pubmed: 25338683
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jul;52(7):962-968
pubmed: 28244980
Blood. 2010 Apr 22;115(16):3215-23
pubmed: 20032498
J Mol Diagn. 2015 Nov;17(6):652-60
pubmed: 26319783
Blood. 1994 Apr 1;83(7):1871-5
pubmed: 8142653
Leukemia. 2007 Apr;21(4):604-11
pubmed: 17287850
Haematologica. 2017 Feb;102(2):e57-e60
pubmed: 27846615
Anal Chem. 2011 Nov 15;83(22):8604-10
pubmed: 22035192
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Leukemia. 2019 Sep;33(9):2254-2265
pubmed: 31227779
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):307-10
pubmed: 12520009
Clin Chem. 2013 Nov;59(11):1670-2
pubmed: 24003063
Haematologica. 2019 Jan;104(1):138-146
pubmed: 30171024
Semin Hematol. 2011 Jul;48(3):172-84
pubmed: 21782059
Haematologica. 2016 Mar;101(3):336-45
pubmed: 26703963
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;971:175-200
pubmed: 23296964
Clin Chem. 2013 Jun;59(6):892-902
pubmed: 23570709
Leukemia. 1998 Dec;12(12):2006-14
pubmed: 9844931
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 10;27(26):4365-70
pubmed: 19652064
Br J Haematol. 2017 May;177(4):588-596
pubmed: 28419517