Global health research and education at medical faculties in Germany.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
03
2019
accepted:
20
03
2020
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
21
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Universities undertake the majority of publicly funded research in Germany and hence bear a responsibility to contribute to global health efforts. So far, involvement and impact of German medical faculties in global health are unknown. Our aim was to systematically asses and evaluate German medical faculties' contribution to global health related research and education, as well as their policies and practices concerning open access publishing and equitable licensing. We assessed the involvement in global health of all 36 publicly funded medical faculties in Germany during 2010-2014 in three areas: innovation, access and education, using the following indicators: research funding and publications focused on global health or poverty-related and neglected diseases; open access publishing and policies promoting access to medical innovations worldwide; provision of global health education. Data were gathered from public databases, university websites and questionnaires sent to individual universities for validation and triangulation. There was a high level of variability between institutions and indicators. The proportion of research funding for poverty-related and neglected diseases research ranged between 0.0-1.1%. The top five institutions received nearly 85% of the total poverty-related and neglected diseases research funding. 20 of 36 universities had an institutional open access publishing policy, 19 had an open access publishing fund, 16 had neither. Only one university reported having used an equitable licensing policy. 22 of 36 faculties provided some global health education, but only one of them included global health in their core undergraduate medical curriculum as a compulsory course with more than just single lectures. Obtained data indicate that global health and poverty-related and neglected diseases research at German medical faculties is highly concentrated in a few institutions, open-access publishing and equitable licensing policies are mostly absent, and only little global health education exists. Universities and government should address global health strategically in both research and education at medical faculties to reflect the country's economic and political weight and human resource potential.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Universities undertake the majority of publicly funded research in Germany and hence bear a responsibility to contribute to global health efforts. So far, involvement and impact of German medical faculties in global health are unknown. Our aim was to systematically asses and evaluate German medical faculties' contribution to global health related research and education, as well as their policies and practices concerning open access publishing and equitable licensing.
METHODS
We assessed the involvement in global health of all 36 publicly funded medical faculties in Germany during 2010-2014 in three areas: innovation, access and education, using the following indicators: research funding and publications focused on global health or poverty-related and neglected diseases; open access publishing and policies promoting access to medical innovations worldwide; provision of global health education. Data were gathered from public databases, university websites and questionnaires sent to individual universities for validation and triangulation.
RESULTS
There was a high level of variability between institutions and indicators. The proportion of research funding for poverty-related and neglected diseases research ranged between 0.0-1.1%. The top five institutions received nearly 85% of the total poverty-related and neglected diseases research funding. 20 of 36 universities had an institutional open access publishing policy, 19 had an open access publishing fund, 16 had neither. Only one university reported having used an equitable licensing policy. 22 of 36 faculties provided some global health education, but only one of them included global health in their core undergraduate medical curriculum as a compulsory course with more than just single lectures.
CONCLUSION
Obtained data indicate that global health and poverty-related and neglected diseases research at German medical faculties is highly concentrated in a few institutions, open-access publishing and equitable licensing policies are mostly absent, and only little global health education exists. Universities and government should address global health strategically in both research and education at medical faculties to reflect the country's economic and political weight and human resource potential.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32310987
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231302
pii: PONE-D-19-07156
pmc: PMC7170220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231302Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec 31;9(12):e0004182
pubmed: 26719978
Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):656-657
pubmed: 29617264
Lancet. 2013 Apr 13;381(9874):1248
pubmed: 23582382
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):304
pubmed: 27884194
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jan 22;8:25818
pubmed: 25623607
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct 29;6(260):260cm11
pubmed: 25355695
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Mar 30;4(3):e570
pubmed: 20361025
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1702-3
pubmed: 24267997
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Oct 08;10:66
pubmed: 20932277
Lancet. 2009 Jun 6;373(9679):1993-5
pubmed: 19493564
Lancet. 2017 Aug 26;390(10097):898-912
pubmed: 28684024
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Oct 10;14(1):76
pubmed: 27724907