Health and well-being literacy initiatives focusing on immigrant communities: an environmental scan protocol to identify "what works and what does not".
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2020
20 04 2020
Historique:
received:
29
10
2019
accepted:
20
03
2020
entrez:
22
4
2020
pubmed:
22
4
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Most of the major cities in the developed western countries are characterized by an increasing multiculturalism brought by the immigrant population. The immigrant communities face challenges in the new environment with their health and wellness related unmet needs. It is imperative to find sustainable ways to empower these diverse communities to champion their health and wellness. Community-based health and wellness literacy initiatives (CBHWLI) focusing on immigrant communities can be an important step towards citizen empowerment in this regard. The aim of the present environmental scan is to identify the key factors that might impact a CBHWLI in immigrant communities in Canada in order to facilitate the process in practice and identify the competencies and training required for its implementation. This study will gather information from existing literature and online sources as well as will capture expert and lay perspectives on the factors that can impact the effectiveness and sustainability of CBHWLIs through conducting a comprehensive environmental scan: (i) a systematic scoping review of published literature and grey literature, (ii) a comprehensive Internet search, (iii) key informant interviews, and (iv) community consultation. Specific methodological and analytical frameworks will guide each step. This study is the first step in establishing a practical base for developing CBHWLI implementation research. Once the initial findings have been generated, the second step will involve inviting experts to provide their input. We first plan to disseminate the results of our scoping review and Internet scan through meetings with key stakeholders, to be followed by journal publications and conference or workshop presentations. Ethical approval is not required for the scoping review or Internet scan; however, approval to conduct interviews with key informants and community consultations in the second stage of the study will be sought from the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32312314
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01340-7
pii: 10.1186/s13643-020-01340-7
pmc: PMC7168966
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
84Références
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):1038-45
pubmed: 26794667
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):25-36
pubmed: 16557511
Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Mar;45(3):214-22
pubmed: 2031523
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Dec;32(4):878-884
pubmed: 27130549
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jan;12(1):101-11
pubmed: 17592762
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24
pubmed: 16557505
Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):897-903
pubmed: 20646073
Fam Pract. 1996 Dec;13(6):522-5
pubmed: 9023528
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):806-12
pubmed: 16881938
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):E19
pubmed: 11720961
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 14;5(7):e007966
pubmed: 26173718
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Oct;27(10):635-641
pubmed: 29056126
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1118-24
pubmed: 25715993
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0191612
pubmed: 29538383
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):760-767
pubmed: 27856066