Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease (TAPS-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 01 02 2020
accepted: 27 02 2020
entrez: 22 4 2020
pubmed: 22 4 2020
medline: 20 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are associated with a higher risk of sickle and pregnancy complications. Limited options exist for treating SCD during pregnancy. Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) has been shown to be effective in treating SCD outside pregnancy, but evidence is lacking regarding its use during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of SPEBT in pregnant women with SCD. The study is an individually randomised, two-arm, feasibility trial with embedded qualitative and health economic studies. Fifty women, 18 years of age and older, with SCD and a singleton pregnancy at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation will be recruited from six hospitals in England. Randomisation will be conducted using a secure online database and minimised by centre, SCD genotype and maternal age. Women allocated to the intervention arm will receive SPEBT commencing at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation, performed using automated erythrocytapheresis every 6-10 weeks until the end of pregnancy, aiming to maintain HbS% or combined HbS/HbC% below 30%. Women in the standard care arm will only receive transfusion when clinically indicated. The primary outcome will be the recruitment rate. Additional endpoints include reasons for refusal to participate, attrition rate, protocol adherence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women will be monitored throughout pregnancy to assess maternal, sickle, and foetal complications. Detailed information about adverse events (including hospital admission) and birth outcomes will be extracted from medical records and via interview at 6 weeks postpartum. An embedded qualitative study will consist of interviews with (a) 15-25 trial participants to assess experiences and acceptability, (b) 5-15 women who decline to participate to identify barriers to recruitment and (c) 15-20 clinical staff to explore fidelity and acceptability. A health economic study will inform a future cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. This feasibility study aims to rigorously evaluate SPEBT as a treatment for SCD in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes. NIH registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03975894 (registered 05/06/19); ISRCTN (www.isrctn.com), registration number ISRCTN52684446 (retrospectively registered 02/08/19).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are associated with a higher risk of sickle and pregnancy complications. Limited options exist for treating SCD during pregnancy. Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) has been shown to be effective in treating SCD outside pregnancy, but evidence is lacking regarding its use during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of SPEBT in pregnant women with SCD.
METHODS METHODS
The study is an individually randomised, two-arm, feasibility trial with embedded qualitative and health economic studies. Fifty women, 18 years of age and older, with SCD and a singleton pregnancy at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation will be recruited from six hospitals in England. Randomisation will be conducted using a secure online database and minimised by centre, SCD genotype and maternal age. Women allocated to the intervention arm will receive SPEBT commencing at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation, performed using automated erythrocytapheresis every 6-10 weeks until the end of pregnancy, aiming to maintain HbS% or combined HbS/HbC% below 30%. Women in the standard care arm will only receive transfusion when clinically indicated. The primary outcome will be the recruitment rate. Additional endpoints include reasons for refusal to participate, attrition rate, protocol adherence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women will be monitored throughout pregnancy to assess maternal, sickle, and foetal complications. Detailed information about adverse events (including hospital admission) and birth outcomes will be extracted from medical records and via interview at 6 weeks postpartum. An embedded qualitative study will consist of interviews with (a) 15-25 trial participants to assess experiences and acceptability, (b) 5-15 women who decline to participate to identify barriers to recruitment and (c) 15-20 clinical staff to explore fidelity and acceptability. A health economic study will inform a future cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This feasibility study aims to rigorously evaluate SPEBT as a treatment for SCD in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NIH registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03975894 (registered 05/06/19); ISRCTN (www.isrctn.com), registration number ISRCTN52684446 (retrospectively registered 02/08/19).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32312326
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4212-8
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-4212-8
pmc: PMC7171865
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03975894']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

347

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0317-20024
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Research for Patient Benefit Programme
ID : PB-PG-0317-20024

Références

Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC. Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1561–73.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510865 pubmed: 28423290
Ware RE, de Montalembert M, Tshilolo L, Abboud MR. Sickle cell disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):311–23.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30193-9 pubmed: 28159390
Oteng-Ntim E, Ayensah B, Knight M, Howard J. Pregnancy outcome in patients with sickle cell disease in the UK–a national cohort study comparing sickle cell anaemia (H b SS) with H b SC disease. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(1):129–37.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.13270 pubmed: 25522142
Oteng-Ntim E, Meeks D, Seed PT, Webster L, Howard J, Doyle P, Chappell LC. Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;125(21):3316–25.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-607317 pubmed: 25800049
Piel FB, Patil AP, Howes RE, Nyangiri OA, Gething PW, Dewi M, Temperley WH, Williams TN, Weatherall DJ, Hay SI. Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):142–51.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61229-X pubmed: 23103089 pmcid: 3547249
Public Health England. NHS sickle cell and thalassaemia screening programme, data report 2016 to 2017: trends and performance analysis. London: Public Health England; 2018.
Oteng-Ntim E, Howard J. Management of sickle cell disease in pregnancy (RCOG Green-top Guideline). London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.
Willits I, Cole H, Jones R, Carter K, Arber M, Jenks M, Craig J, Sims A. Spectra Optia® for automated red blood cell exchange in patients with sickle cell disease: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(4):455–68.
doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0302-x pubmed: 28110486 pmcid: 5506506
Okusanya BO, Oladapo OT. Prophylactic versus selective blood transfusion for sickle cell disease in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD010378.
pubmed: 28005272
Koshy M, Burd L, Wallace D, Moawad A, Baron J. Prophylactic red-cell transfusions in pregnant patients with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(22):1447–52.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812013192204 pubmed: 3054555
Malinowski AK, Shehata N, D'Souza R, Kuo KH, Ward R, Shah PS, Murphy K. Prophylactic transfusion for pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;126(21):2424–35.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-649319 pubmed: 26302758
Benites BD, Benevides TCL, Valente IS, Marques JF Jr, Gilli SCO, Saad STO. The effects of exchange transfusion for prevention of complications during pregnancy of sickle hemoglobin C disease patients. Transfusion. 2016;56(1):119–24.
doi: 10.1111/trf.13280 pubmed: 26337929
Malinowski AK, Parrish J, Shehata N, Ward R, Kuo KH. Approach to transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a survey of physicians. Br J Haematol. 2017;183(3):516–9.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.14993 pubmed: 29076147
Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. Working Papers 138chedp. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 1995.
O’Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J, Jansen YJ, Mills N, Moore G, Donovan JL. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):32.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y pubmed: 27965810 pmcid: 5154038
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8 pubmed: 27965879 pmcid: 5154046
Howard J, Malfroy M, Llewelyn C, Choo L, Hodge R, Johnson T, Purohit S, Rees DC, Tillyer L, Walker I, et al. The transfusion alternatives preoperatively in sickle cell disease (TAPS) study: a randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9870):930–8.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61726-7 pubmed: 23352054
Lee MT, Piomelli S, Granger S, Miller ST, Harkness S, Brambilla DJ, Adams RJ. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia (STOP): extended follow-up and final results. Blood. 2006;108(3):847–52.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-009506 pubmed: 16861341 pmcid: 1895848

Auteurs

Laura L Oakley (LL)

Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. laura.oakley@lshtm.ac.uk.
Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, N-0213, Oslo, Norway. laura.oakley@lshtm.ac.uk.

Moji Awogbade (M)

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Sarah Brien (S)

Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Annette Briley (A)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5001, South Australia, Australia.

Maria Chorozoglou (M)

Southampton Health Technology Assessment Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, The University of Southampton Science Park, Alpha House, Enterprise Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Emma Drasar (E)

Whittington Health NHS Trust, Magdala Avenue, London, N19 5NF, UK.

Jemma Johns (J)

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Elizabeth Rhodes (E)

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK.

Vicky Robinson (V)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Paul Seed (P)

Division of Women's Health, Kings College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 10th floor North Wing, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Joseph Sharif (J)

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.

Claire Singh (C)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Paul Telfer (P)

Barts Health NHS Trust, 80 Newark Street, London, E1 2ES, UK.

Hilary Thompson (H)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Ingrid Watt-Coote (I)

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0QT, UK.

Jo Howard (J)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College London, Rayne Institute, London, SE5 9NU, UK.

Eugene Oteng-Ntim (E)

Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Division of Women's Health, Kings College London, St Thomas' Hospital, 10th floor North Wing, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH