Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease (TAPS-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Anemia, Sickle Cell
/ therapy
Blood Transfusion
/ economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
England
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ therapy
Prenatal Care
/ methods
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Young Adult
Sickle cell disease, Pregnancy, Blood transfusion, Feasibility, Randomised controlled trial, Economic evaluation, Qualitative
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Apr 2020
20 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
01
02
2020
accepted:
27
02
2020
entrez:
22
4
2020
pubmed:
22
4
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are associated with a higher risk of sickle and pregnancy complications. Limited options exist for treating SCD during pregnancy. Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) has been shown to be effective in treating SCD outside pregnancy, but evidence is lacking regarding its use during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of SPEBT in pregnant women with SCD. The study is an individually randomised, two-arm, feasibility trial with embedded qualitative and health economic studies. Fifty women, 18 years of age and older, with SCD and a singleton pregnancy at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation will be recruited from six hospitals in England. Randomisation will be conducted using a secure online database and minimised by centre, SCD genotype and maternal age. Women allocated to the intervention arm will receive SPEBT commencing at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation, performed using automated erythrocytapheresis every 6-10 weeks until the end of pregnancy, aiming to maintain HbS% or combined HbS/HbC% below 30%. Women in the standard care arm will only receive transfusion when clinically indicated. The primary outcome will be the recruitment rate. Additional endpoints include reasons for refusal to participate, attrition rate, protocol adherence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women will be monitored throughout pregnancy to assess maternal, sickle, and foetal complications. Detailed information about adverse events (including hospital admission) and birth outcomes will be extracted from medical records and via interview at 6 weeks postpartum. An embedded qualitative study will consist of interviews with (a) 15-25 trial participants to assess experiences and acceptability, (b) 5-15 women who decline to participate to identify barriers to recruitment and (c) 15-20 clinical staff to explore fidelity and acceptability. A health economic study will inform a future cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. This feasibility study aims to rigorously evaluate SPEBT as a treatment for SCD in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes. NIH registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03975894 (registered 05/06/19); ISRCTN (www.isrctn.com), registration number ISRCTN52684446 (retrospectively registered 02/08/19).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are associated with a higher risk of sickle and pregnancy complications. Limited options exist for treating SCD during pregnancy. Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) has been shown to be effective in treating SCD outside pregnancy, but evidence is lacking regarding its use during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of SPEBT in pregnant women with SCD.
METHODS
METHODS
The study is an individually randomised, two-arm, feasibility trial with embedded qualitative and health economic studies. Fifty women, 18 years of age and older, with SCD and a singleton pregnancy at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation will be recruited from six hospitals in England. Randomisation will be conducted using a secure online database and minimised by centre, SCD genotype and maternal age. Women allocated to the intervention arm will receive SPEBT commencing at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation, performed using automated erythrocytapheresis every 6-10 weeks until the end of pregnancy, aiming to maintain HbS% or combined HbS/HbC% below 30%. Women in the standard care arm will only receive transfusion when clinically indicated. The primary outcome will be the recruitment rate. Additional endpoints include reasons for refusal to participate, attrition rate, protocol adherence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women will be monitored throughout pregnancy to assess maternal, sickle, and foetal complications. Detailed information about adverse events (including hospital admission) and birth outcomes will be extracted from medical records and via interview at 6 weeks postpartum. An embedded qualitative study will consist of interviews with (a) 15-25 trial participants to assess experiences and acceptability, (b) 5-15 women who decline to participate to identify barriers to recruitment and (c) 15-20 clinical staff to explore fidelity and acceptability. A health economic study will inform a future cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This feasibility study aims to rigorously evaluate SPEBT as a treatment for SCD in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NIH registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03975894 (registered 05/06/19); ISRCTN (www.isrctn.com), registration number ISRCTN52684446 (retrospectively registered 02/08/19).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32312326
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4212-8
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-4212-8
pmc: PMC7171865
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03975894']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
347Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0317-20024
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Research for Patient Benefit Programme
ID : PB-PG-0317-20024
Références
Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC. Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1561–73.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510865
pubmed: 28423290
Ware RE, de Montalembert M, Tshilolo L, Abboud MR. Sickle cell disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):311–23.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30193-9
pubmed: 28159390
Oteng-Ntim E, Ayensah B, Knight M, Howard J. Pregnancy outcome in patients with sickle cell disease in the UK–a national cohort study comparing sickle cell anaemia (H b SS) with H b SC disease. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(1):129–37.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.13270
pubmed: 25522142
Oteng-Ntim E, Meeks D, Seed PT, Webster L, Howard J, Doyle P, Chappell LC. Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;125(21):3316–25.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-607317
pubmed: 25800049
Piel FB, Patil AP, Howes RE, Nyangiri OA, Gething PW, Dewi M, Temperley WH, Williams TN, Weatherall DJ, Hay SI. Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):142–51.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61229-X
pubmed: 23103089
pmcid: 3547249
Public Health England. NHS sickle cell and thalassaemia screening programme, data report 2016 to 2017: trends and performance analysis. London: Public Health England; 2018.
Oteng-Ntim E, Howard J. Management of sickle cell disease in pregnancy (RCOG Green-top Guideline). London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.
Willits I, Cole H, Jones R, Carter K, Arber M, Jenks M, Craig J, Sims A. Spectra Optia® for automated red blood cell exchange in patients with sickle cell disease: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(4):455–68.
doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0302-x
pubmed: 28110486
pmcid: 5506506
Okusanya BO, Oladapo OT. Prophylactic versus selective blood transfusion for sickle cell disease in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD010378.
pubmed: 28005272
Koshy M, Burd L, Wallace D, Moawad A, Baron J. Prophylactic red-cell transfusions in pregnant patients with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(22):1447–52.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812013192204
pubmed: 3054555
Malinowski AK, Shehata N, D'Souza R, Kuo KH, Ward R, Shah PS, Murphy K. Prophylactic transfusion for pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;126(21):2424–35.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-649319
pubmed: 26302758
Benites BD, Benevides TCL, Valente IS, Marques JF Jr, Gilli SCO, Saad STO. The effects of exchange transfusion for prevention of complications during pregnancy of sickle hemoglobin C disease patients. Transfusion. 2016;56(1):119–24.
doi: 10.1111/trf.13280
pubmed: 26337929
Malinowski AK, Parrish J, Shehata N, Ward R, Kuo KH. Approach to transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a survey of physicians. Br J Haematol. 2017;183(3):516–9.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.14993
pubmed: 29076147
Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. Working Papers 138chedp. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 1995.
O’Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J, Jansen YJ, Mills N, Moore G, Donovan JL. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):32.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y
pubmed: 27965810
pmcid: 5154038
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8
pubmed: 27965879
pmcid: 5154046
Howard J, Malfroy M, Llewelyn C, Choo L, Hodge R, Johnson T, Purohit S, Rees DC, Tillyer L, Walker I, et al. The transfusion alternatives preoperatively in sickle cell disease (TAPS) study: a randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9870):930–8.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61726-7
pubmed: 23352054
Lee MT, Piomelli S, Granger S, Miller ST, Harkness S, Brambilla DJ, Adams RJ. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia (STOP): extended follow-up and final results. Blood. 2006;108(3):847–52.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-009506
pubmed: 16861341
pmcid: 1895848