Evaluation of the measurement properties of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) in Hispanic caregivers to patients with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease
Caregivers
/ psychology
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Hispanic or Latino
/ psychology
Humans
Language
Male
Middle Aged
Psychometrics
/ methods
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Stress, Psychological
/ ethnology
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Translations
Latinx caregivers
dementia
differential item functioning
stress measurement
Journal
International psychogeriatrics
ISSN: 1741-203X
Titre abrégé: Int Psychogeriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007918
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
22
4
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
22
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is the most widely used measure of perceived stress; however, minimal psychometric evaluation has been performed among Hispanic respondents, and even less among Hispanic caregivers to persons with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRDs). Secondary data analysis. New York City, NY, USA. A sample of 453 community dwelling Hispanic caregivers to patients with ADRD. Latent variable models were used to evaluate the PSS. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine unidimensionality. Differential item functioning (DIF) was examined for age, education, and language using the graded item response model. The factor and bifactor analyses results supported essential unidimensionality of the item set; however, positively worded items were observed using response item theory to be less informative than the negatively worded items. Reliability estimates were high. Salient DIF was not observed for age, education, or language of interview using the primary DIF detection method. Sensitivity analyses using a second DIF detection method identified uniform language-DIF for the item, "In the last month, how often have you felt that you were on top of things?" However, the non-compensatory DIF value was below the threshold considered salient. In summary, the 10-item PSS performed well in a sample of English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanic caregivers to patients with ADRD. Very little DIF, and none of high magnitude and impact, was observed. However, the negatively worded items, perhaps because they are more directly reflective of stress, were more informative. In the context of a short-form measure or computerized adaptive test, more informative items are those that would be selected for inclusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32312342
pii: S1041610220000502
doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000502
pmc: PMC8259452
mid: NIHMS1673032
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1073-1084Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG022845
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG028741
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG059303
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR014430
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1708-1715
pubmed: 30084133
Fam Med. 1993 Jun;25(6):391-5
pubmed: 8349060
Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):250-67
pubmed: 12825775
Appl Res Qual Life. 2017 Jun;12(2):251-288
pubmed: 30220935
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
J Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(5):628-639
pubmed: 28810432
JAMA. 1999 Dec 15;282(23):2215-9
pubmed: 10605972
Psychol Assess. 2017 Mar;29(3):320-328
pubmed: 27280744
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2018 Apr;49:146-169
pubmed: 29551356
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:1-12
pubmed: 29653200
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jan;30(1):39-47
pubmed: 28737120
Science. 2015 Dec 4;350(6265):1193-8
pubmed: 26785477
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 May;53(5):319-20
pubmed: 10396541
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Sep;30(6):584-90
pubmed: 25635108
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77
pubmed: 17060838
Stress Health. 2013 Aug;29(3):253-60
pubmed: 23027679
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Dec;31(6):576-85
pubmed: 18449942
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):79-98
pubmed: 28706769
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46
pubmed: 2320703
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 25;6(11):e014082
pubmed: 27888180
Assessment. 2004 Sep;11(3):216-23
pubmed: 15358877
Span J Psychol. 2007 May;10(1):199-206
pubmed: 17549893
Psychol Methods. 2006 Dec;11(4):344-62
pubmed: 17154751
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(3):987-996
pubmed: 28671128
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59
pubmed: 20954056
Span J Psychol. 2006 May;9(1):86-93
pubmed: 16673626
J Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):107-14
pubmed: 20064889
Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):90-101
pubmed: 25346996
J Stat Softw. 2011 Mar 1;39(8):1-30
pubmed: 21572908
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:19-31
pubmed: 17479357
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;29(6):645-52
pubmed: 24302253
J Asthma. 2007 May;44(4):311-6
pubmed: 17530531
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep 1;47(5):667-696
pubmed: 24049214