Isolated Penile Edema After Diagnostic Paracentesis.
complications
emergency medicine
genital edema
liver disease
paracentesis
penile edema
urology
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Mar 2020
19 Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
22
4
2020
pubmed:
22
4
2020
medline:
22
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diagnostic paracentesis is a routinely practiced, typically safe procedure performed in the emergency department. Genital swelling post-paracentesis is a rare complication with few documented case reports. We report a case of isolated penile edema after a diagnostic paracentesis performed in the emergency department. The patient is a 63-year-old male who came to the emergency department with a two-day history of isolated penile swelling after undergoing a diagnostic paracentesis in the emergency department as part of his workup during a recent hospital admission. On exam, the paracentesis site was noticeably low, beneath the inguinal ligament on the right side. His genital exam showed a circumcised penis with significant soft tissue swelling that involved the entire penile shaft sparing the glans and scrotum. There was no penile tenderness on palpation or urethral discharge. The testicles and scrotum revealed no signs of edema or tenderness, hernias, or abnormal lie. Of note, the patient reported that he had a less severe episode of penile swelling approximately one year ago after a paracentesis in a similarly low site, which resolved spontaneously. The features and timing of this presentation, added to the patient's previous episode over a year ago, pointed to this being a sequela of the paracentesis he had undergone during his last hospital stay. After evaluation and consultation with the urology service, he was discharged home with expectant management and outpatient follow-up. His symptoms resolved spontaneously after one week. To our knowledge, there have been no published reports of isolated penile edema after a diagnostic paracentesis. This case could be used when teaching the proper technique for performing a paracentesis and its potential complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32313770
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7329
pmc: PMC7164694
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e7329Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Ojalvo et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;52(3):268-73
pubmed: 18433932
Liver Int. 2005 Oct;25(5):984-6
pubmed: 16162157
Arch Intern Med. 1986 Nov;146(11):2259-61
pubmed: 2946271
Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Dec;52(12):3307-15
pubmed: 17393312
Am J Med. 2016 Jul;129(7):e65-6
pubmed: 26968473
Ann Intern Med. 1971 Jun;74(6):943-5
pubmed: 4253007
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):767-77
pubmed: 27557303
JAMA. 1978 Feb 13;239(7):628-30
pubmed: 146097
Dig Liver Dis. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):41-8
pubmed: 11303974
Ann Intern Med. 1971 Oct;75(4):647
pubmed: 5106574
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Aug;7(8):906-9
pubmed: 19447197
Ann Intern Med. 1971 Nov;75(5):810
pubmed: 5122179