Control of cell colony growth by contact inhibition.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 04 2020
Historique:
received: 23 08 2019
accepted: 20 03 2020
entrez: 23 4 2020
pubmed: 23 4 2020
medline: 27 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Contact inhibition is a cell property that limits the migration and proliferation of cells in crowded environments. Here we investigate the growth dynamics of a cell colony composed of migrating and proliferating cells on a substrate using a minimal model that incorporates the mechanisms of contact inhibition of locomotion and proliferation. We find two distinct regimes. At early times, when contact inhibition is weak, the colony grows exponentially in time, fully characterised by the proliferation rate. At long times, the colony boundary moves at a constant speed, determined only by the migration speed of a single cell and independent of the proliferation rate. Further, the model demonstrates how cell-cell alignment speeds up colony growth. Our model illuminates how simple local mechanical interactions give rise to contact inhibition, and from this, how cell colony growth is self-organised and controlled on a local level.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32317692
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62913-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-62913-z
pmc: PMC7174381
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6713

Références

Friedl, P. & Gilmour, D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 445–457, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2720 (2009).
doi: 10.1038/nrm2720 pubmed: 19546857
Rørth, P. Collective cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 407–29, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113231 (2009).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113231 pubmed: 19575657
Angelini, T. E. et al. Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4714–4719, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010059108 (2011).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010059108 pubmed: 21321233
Méhes, E. & Vicsek, T. Collective motion of cells: from experiments to models. Integr. Biol. 6, 831–854, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ib00115j , 1403.1127 (2014).
Mayor, R. & Etienne-Manneville, S. The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 97–109, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2015.14 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.14 pubmed: 26726037
Hakim, V. & Silberzan, P. Collective cell migration: a physics perspective. Reports Prog. Phys 80, 076601, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa65ef (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa65ef
Lecuit, T. & Le Goff, L. Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis. Nature 450, 189–192, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06304 , 36048998478 (2007).
Poujade, M. et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15988–15993, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705062104 (2007).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705062104 pubmed: 17905871
Trepat, X. et al. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat. Phys 5, 426–430, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1269 (2009).
doi: 10.1038/nphys1269
Petitjean, L. et al. Velocity Fields in a Collectively Migrating Epithelium. Biophys. J. 98, 1790–1800, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.030 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.030 pubmed: 20441742 pmcid: 2862185
Gauquelin, E. et al. Influence of proliferation on the motions of epithelial monolayers invading adherent strips. Soft Matter, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00105K (2019).
Abercrombie, M. & Heaysman, J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. Exp. Cell Res. 5, 111–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(53)90098-6 (1953).
doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(53)90098-6 pubmed: 13083622
Abercrombie, M. Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature 281, 259–262, https://doi.org/10.1038/281259a0 (1979).
doi: 10.1038/281259a0 pubmed: 551275
Carmona-Fontaine, C. et al. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 456, 957–61, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07441 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nature07441 pubmed: 19078960 pmcid: 2635562
Scarpa, E. et al. Cadherin Switch during EMT in Neural Crest Cells Leads to Contact Inhibition of Locomotion via Repolarization of Forces. Dev. Cell 34, 421–434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.012 , arXiv:1503.07116v1 (2015).
Stramer, B. & Mayor, R. Mechanisms and in vivo functions of contact inhibition of locomotion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.118 (2016).
Theveneau, E. et al. Collective Chemotaxis Requires Contact-Dependent Cell Polarity. Dev. Cell 19, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.012 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.012 pubmed: 20643349 pmcid: 2913244
Carmona-Fontaine, C. et al. Complement Fragment C3a Controls Mutual Cell Attraction during Collective Cell Migration. Dev. Cell 21, 1026–1037, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.012 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.012 pubmed: 22118769 pmcid: 3272547
Coburn, L., Cerone, L., Torney, C., Couzin, I. D. & Neufeld, Z. Tactile interactions lead to coherent motion and enhanced chemotaxis of migrating cells. Phys. Biol. 10, 046002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/046002 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/046002 pubmed: 23752100
Smeets, B. et al. Emergent structures and dynamics of cell colonies by contact inhibition of locomotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 201521151, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521151113 (2016).
Puliafito, A. et al. Collective and single cell behavior in epithelial contact inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 739–744, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007809109 (2012).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007809109 pubmed: 22228306
Zimmermann, J., Camley, B. A., Rappel, W.-J. & Levine, H. Contact inhibition of locomotion determines cell-cell and cell-substrate forces in tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522330113 (2016).
Li, J. F. & Lowengrub, J. The effects of cell compressibility, motility and contact inhibition on the growth of tumor cell clusters using the Cellular Potts Model. J. Theor. Biol. 343, 79–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.10.008 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.10.008 pubmed: 24211749
Fisher, H. W. & Yeh, J. Contact Inhibition in Colony Formation. Science 155, 581–582, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3762.581 (1967).
doi: 10.1126/science.155.3762.581 pubmed: 6066687
Fujito, T. et al. Inhibition of cell movement and proliferation by cell-cell contact-induced interaction of Necl-5 with nectin-3. J. Cell Biol 171, 165–173, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200501090 (2005).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200501090 pubmed: 16216929 pmcid: 2171219
Takai, Y., Miyoshi, J., Ikeda, W. & Ogita, H. Nectins and nectin-like molecules: Roles in contact inhibition of cell movement and proliferation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 603–615, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2457 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nrm2457 pubmed: 18648374
Stoker, M. G. Role of diffusion boundary layer in contact inhibition of growth. Nature 246, 200–203, https://doi.org/10.1038/246200a0 (1973).
doi: 10.1038/246200a0 pubmed: 4586793
Stoker, M. & Piggott, D. Shaking 3T3 cells: Further studies on diffusion boundary effects. Cell 3, 207–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(74)90133-0 (1974).
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90133-0 pubmed: 4611644
Dunn, G. A. & Ireland, G. W. New evidence that growth in 3T3 cell cultures is a diffusion-limited process. Nature 312, 63–65, https://doi.org/10.1038/312063a0 (1984).
doi: 10.1038/312063a0 pubmed: 6493341
Martz, E. & Steinberg Ms. The role of cell-cell contact in “contact” inhibition of cell division: a review and new evidence. J. Cell. Physiol. 79, 189–210 (1972).
doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040790205
Stoker, M. G. P. & Rubin, H. Density dependent inhibition of cell growth in culture. Nature 215, 171–172, https://doi.org/10.1038/215171a0 (1967).
doi: 10.1038/215171a0 pubmed: 6049107
Camley, B. A. & Rappel, W. J. Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 50, 113002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa56fe (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa56fe pubmed: 28989187 pmcid: 5625300
Tarama, M. & Yamamoto, R. Mechanics of cell crawling by means of force-free cyclic motion. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 87, 044803, https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.87.044803 , 1712.05097 (2018).
Goychuk, A. et al. Morphology and Motility of Cells on Soft Substrates. arXiv, 1808.00314 (2018).
Molina, J. J. & Yamamoto, R. Modeling the mechanosensitivity of fast-crawling cells on cyclically stretched substrates. Soft Matter 15, 683–698, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM01903G , 1807.02295 (2019).
Bi, D., Yang, X., Marchetti, M. C. & Manning, M. L. Motility-Driven Glass and Jamming Transitions in Biological Tissues. Phys. Rev. X 6, 021011, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021011 , 1509.06578 (2016).
Blanch-Mercader, C., Casademunt, J. & Joanny, J. F. Morphology and growth of polarized tissues. Eur. Phys. J. E 37, https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2014-14041-2 (2014).
Yabunaka, S. & Marcq, P. Cell growth, division, and death in cohesive tissues: A thermodynamic approach. Phys. Rev. E 96, 022406, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.022406 , 1707.05557 (2017).
Yabunaka, S. & Marcq, P. Emergence of epithelial cell density waves. Soft Matter 13, 7046–7052, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7sm01172e , 1708.06687 (2017).
Drasdo, D., Kree, R. & McCaskill, J. S. Monte Carlo approach to tissue-cell populations. Phys. Rev. E 52, 6635–6657, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.52.6635 , 0001177693 (1995).
Radszuweit, M., Block, M., Hengstler, J. G., Schöll, E. & Drasdo, D. Comparing the growth kinetics of cell populations in two and three dimensions. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys 79, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051907 (2009).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051907
Drasdo, D., Hoehme, S. & Block, M. On the role of physics in the growth and pattern formation of multi-cellular systems: What can we learn from individual-cell based models? J. Stat. Phys. 128, 287–345, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-007-9289-x , 34249873259 (2007).
Basan, M., Prost, J., Joanny, J.-F. & Elgeti, J. Dissipative particle dynamics simulations for biological tissues: rheology and competition. Phys. Biol. 8, 026014, https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/8/2/026014 , 79954495392 (2011).
Basan, M., Elgeti, J., Hannezo, E., Rappel, W.-J. & Levine, H. Alignment of cellular motility forces with tissue flow as a mechanism for efficient wound healing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2452–9, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219937110 , 84873721320 (2013).
Farrell, F. D. C., Hallatschek, O., Marenduzzo, D. & Waclaw, B. Mechanically Driven Growth of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Microbial Colonies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 168101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.168101 (2013).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.168101 pubmed: 24182305
Farrell, F. D. C. Modelling Collective Behaviour and Pattern Formation in Bacterial Colonies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh (2014).
Esipov, S. E. & Shapiro, J. A. Kinetic model of proteus mirabilis swarm colony development. Journal of Mathematical Biology 36, 249–268, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850050100 (1998).
doi: 10.1007/s002850050100
Frénod, E. & Sire, O. An explanatory model to validate the way water activity rules periodic terrace generation in proteus mirabilis swarm. Journal of Mathematical Biology 59, 439–466, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0235-6 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s00285-008-0235-6 pubmed: 19009295
Gaush, C. R., Hard, W. L. & Smith, T. F. Characterization of an established line of canine kidney cells (MDCK). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.) 122, 931–935, https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-122-31293 (1966).
doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31293
Freyer, J. P. & Sutherland, R. M. Regulation of growth saturation and development of necrosis in EMT6/Ro multicellular spheroids by the glucose and oxygen supply. Cancer Res. 46, 3504–12 (1986).
pubmed: 3708582
Brú, A. et al. Super-rough dynamics on tumor growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4008–4011, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4008 (1998).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4008
Schnyder, S. K., Molina, J. J., Tanaka, Y. & Yamamoto, R. Collective motion of cells crawling on a substrate: Roles of cell shape and contact inhibition. Sci. Rep 7, 5163, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05321-0 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05321-0 pubmed: 28701766 pmcid: 5507894
Xi, W., Saw, T. B., Delacour, D., Lim, C. T. & Ladoux, B. Material approaches to active tissue mechanics. Nat. Rev. Mater., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0066-z (2018).
Roca-Cusachs, P., Conte, V. & Trepat, X. Quantifying forces in cell biology. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 742–751, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3564 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncb3564 pubmed: 28628082
Yang, X. et al. Correlating cell shape and cellular stress in motile confluent tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 12663–12668, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705921114 , 1704.05951 (2017).
Shraiman, B. I. Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3318–23, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404782102 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404782102 pubmed: 15728365
Serra-Picamal, X. et al. Mechanical waves during tissue expansion. Nat. Phys 8, 628–634, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2355 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nphys2355
Tambe, D. T. et al. Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat. Mater. 10, 469–475, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3025 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nmat3025 pubmed: 21602808 pmcid: 3135682
Ananthakrishnan, R. & Ehrlicher, A. The forces behind cell movement. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 3, 303–317, https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3.303 (2007).
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.3.303 pubmed: 17589565 pmcid: 1893118
Zimmermann, J. et al. Intercellular Stress Reconstitution from Traction Force Data. Biophys. J. 107, 548–554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.036 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.036 pubmed: 25099794 pmcid: 4129476
Maeda, Y. T., Inose, J., Matsuo, M. Y., Iwaya, S. & Sano, M. Ordered patterns of cell shape and orientational correlation during spontaneous cell migration. PLoS One 3, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003734 (2008).
Keren, K. et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453, 475–480, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06952 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nature06952 pubmed: 18497816 pmcid: 2877812
Ziebert, F., Swaminathan, S. & Aranson, I. S. Model for self-polarization and motility of keratocyte fragments. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 1084–1092, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0433 (2012).
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0433 pubmed: 22012972
Ohta, T., Tarama, M. & Sano, M. Simple model of cell crawling. Phys. D 318–319, 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2015.10.007 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2015.10.007
Tjhung, E. & Berthier, L. Discontinuous fluidization transition in time-correlated assemblies of actively deforming particles. Phys. Rev. E 96, 050601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.050601 , 1607.01734 (2017).
Campo, M., Schnyder, S. K., Molina, J. J., Speck, T. & Yamamoto, R. Spontaneous spatiotemporal ordering of shape oscillations enhances cell migration. Soft Matter 15, 4939–4946, https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00526A , 1901.06707 (2019).
Jin, S. & Collins, L. R. Dynamics of dissolved polymer chains in isotropic turbulence. New J. Phys. 9, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/10/360 (2007).
Tzur, A., Kafri, R., LeBleu, V. S. & Lahav, G. & Kirschner, M. W. Cell Growth and Size Homeostasis in Proliferating Animal Cells. Science (80-.) 325, 167–171, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174294 (2009).
doi: 10.1126/science.1174294
Drescher, K., Dunkel, J., Cisneros, L. H., Ganguly, S. & Goldstein, R. E. Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cell – cell and cell – surface scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 10940–10945, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019079108 (2011).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019079108 pubmed: 21690349
Wensink, H. H. et al. Meso-scale turbulence in living fluids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 14308–14313, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202032109 , 1208.4239v1 (2012).
Nelson, W. J. Remodelling Epithelial Cell Organization: Transitions Between Front-Rear and Apical Basal Polarity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 1, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000513 (2009).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000513
Tanimoto, H. & Sano, M. Dynamics of traction stress field during cell division. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.248110 (2012).
Gibson, M. C., Patel, A. B., Nagpal, R. & Perrimon, N. The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia. Nature 442, 1038–1041, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05014 , 33748313224 (2006).
D’Alessandro, J. et al. Contact enhancement of locomotion in spreading cell colonies. Nat. Phys. 13, 999–1005, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4180 , 1701.01225 (2017).
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 (2007).
doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

Auteurs

Simon K Schnyder (SK)

Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8103, Japan. skschnyder@gmail.com.

John J Molina (JJ)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 615-8510, Japan.

Ryoichi Yamamoto (R)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 615-8510, Japan.
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH