Peer learning versus conventional teaching regarding antenatal assessment among nursing students in terms of knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: An interventional study.

Antenatal assessment conventional teaching peer learning

Journal

Journal of education and health promotion
ISSN: 2277-9531
Titre abrégé: J Educ Health Promot
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101593794

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 20 06 2019
accepted: 13 12 2019
entrez: 23 4 2020
pubmed: 23 4 2020
medline: 23 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Eaching methods are the stimulation, guidance, direction, and encouragement for learning and also the means to achieve the desired educational objectives. This study aimed to assess peer learning (PL) versus conventional teaching (CT) regarding antenatal assessment in terms of knowledge, skills, and satisfaction among nursing students. This was a quasi-experimental study conducted on 51 B.Sc.Nursing 3 The study results revealed that the mean posttest knowledge score (19.1 ± 0.75) in PL group was higher than that in CT group (17.0 ± 0.741) and the mean rank skill score of PL group (44.90) was higher than that in the CT group (20.30). There was no significant difference ( Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that both PL and CT groups were found to be equally effective in improving knowledge and skills of nursing students regarding antenatal assessment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32318617
doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_353_19
pii: JEHP-9-49
pmc: PMC7161656
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

49

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Nov;24(11):825-9
pubmed: 25404441

Auteurs

Shagun Parmar (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be) University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Adiba Siddiqui (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be) University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Simarjeet Kaur (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be) University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Jyoti Sarin (J)

Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing Department Faculty of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be) University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Classifications MeSH