Cytogenetically-based biodosimetry after high doses of radiation.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
18
07
2019
accepted:
13
01
2020
entrez:
23
4
2020
pubmed:
23
4
2020
medline:
2
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dosimetry is an important tool for triage and treatment planning following any radiation exposure accident, and biological dosimetry, which estimates exposure dose using a biological parameter, is a practical means of determining the specific dose an individual receives. The cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay (CBMN) is an established biodosimetric tool to measure chromosomal damage in mitogen-stimulated human lymphocytes. The CBMN method is especially valuable for biodosimetry in triage situations thanks to simplicity in scoring and adaptability to high-throughput automated sample processing systems. While this technique produces dose-response data which fit very well to a linear-quadratic model for exposures to low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation and for doses up for 5 Gy, limitations to the accuracy of this method arise at larger doses. Accuracy at higher doses is limited by the number of cells reaching mitosis. Whereas it would be expected that the yield of micronuclei increases with the dose, in many experiments it has been shown to actually decrease when normalized over the total number of cells. This variation from a monotonically increasing dose response poses a limitation for retrospective dose reconstruction. In this study we modified the standard CBMN assay to increase its accuracy following exposures to higher doses of photons or a mixed neutron-photon beam. The assay is modified either through inhibitions of the G2/M and spindle checkpoints with the addition of caffeine and/or ZM447439 (an Aurora kinase inhibitor), respectively to the blood cultures at select times during the assay. Our results showed that caffeine addition improved assay performance for photon up to 10 Gy. This was achieved by extending the assay time from the typical 70 h to just 74 h. Compared to micronuclei yields without inhibitors, addition of caffeine and ZM447439 resulted in improved accuracy in the detection of micronuclei yields up to 10 Gy from photons and 4 Gy of mixed neutrons-photons. When the dose-effect curves were fitted to take into account the turnover phenomenon observed at higher doses, best fitting was achieved when the combination of both inhibitors was used. These techniques permit reliable dose reconstruction after high doses of radiation with a method that can be adapted to high-throughput automated sample processing systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32320391
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228350
pii: PONE-D-19-20090
pmc: PMC7176141
doi:
Substances chimiques
4-(4-(N-benzoylamino)anilino)-6-methoxy-7-(3-(1-morpholino)propoxy)quinazoline
0
Benzamides
0
Protons
0
Quinazolines
0
Caffeine
3G6A5W338E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0228350Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI067773
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2015 Sep 11;794:234-239
pubmed: 26273118
Mutat Res. 2002 May 22;502(1-2):47-51
pubmed: 11996971
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Apr;154(2):186-97
pubmed: 22923248
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 06;11(8):
pubmed: 31390832
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 May;79(9):2942-6
pubmed: 6953438
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2005 Dec;44(3):211-8
pubmed: 16273382
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2011 Aug;50(3):371-81
pubmed: 21479955
Radiat Res. 2015 Aug;184(2):134-42
pubmed: 26230078
Mutagenesis. 1986 Jan;1(1):41-4
pubmed: 3325735
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Dec;172(1-3):230-237
pubmed: 27344061
Nature. 2012 Jan 18;482(7383):53-8
pubmed: 22258507
Mutat Res. 2010 Aug 14;701(1):80-5
pubmed: 20472094
J Radiat Res. 2002 Dec;43 Suppl:S175-9
pubmed: 12793754
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 02;9(12):e114137
pubmed: 25461738
Int J Radiat Biol. 2001 Feb;77(2):175-83
pubmed: 11236924
Mutat Res. 2013 Aug 30;756(1-2):196-200
pubmed: 23665190
Radiat Res. 2016 Feb;185(2):151-62
pubmed: 26771173
Radiat Res. 2017 Apr;187(4):492-498
pubmed: 28231025
Mutat Res. 1985 Feb-Apr;147(1-2):29-36
pubmed: 3974610
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 May;149(4):392-8
pubmed: 21835842
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014 Jun;159(1-4):87-94
pubmed: 24743767
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Dec;172(1-3):201-206
pubmed: 27412510
Int J Radiat Biol. 1998 Oct;74(4):457-62
pubmed: 9798956
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1983 Feb;43(2):123-32
pubmed: 6600726
Int J Radiat Biol. 2003 Feb;79(2):83-97
pubmed: 12569012
Microsc Res Tech. 2015 Jul;78(7):587-98
pubmed: 25939519
Radiat Res. 2014 Feb;181(2):146-61
pubmed: 24502354